Overcompensation and adaptive plasticity of apical dominance in Erysimum strictum (Brassicaceae) in response to simulated browsing and resource availability

Oikos

Volumn 111, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 179-191

  Rautio, P ^a   Huhta, A P ^b   Piippo, S ^b   Tuomi, J ^b   Juenger, T ^c   Saari, M ^b   Aspi, J ^b  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APICAL DOMINANCE; BROWSING; COMPENSATION; PLASTICITY; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY;

BRASSICA; BRASSICACEAE; ERYSIMUM; ERYSIMUM CHEIRANTHOIDES; ERYSIMUM STRICTUM;

EID: 26444462094     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.14045.x     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aarssen, L. W. 1995. Hypothesis for the evolution of apical dominance in plants: implications for the interpretation of overcompensation. - Oikos 74: 149-156.
2. Aarssen, L. W. and Irwin, D. L. 1991. What selection: herbivory or competition? - Oikos 60: 261-262.
3. Ahti, T. 1965. Erysimum hieraciifolium L. - In: Jalas, J. (ed.), Suuri kasvikirja II. Otava, Helsinki, pp. 567-569. (In Finnish)
4. Belsky, A. J. 1986. Does herbivory benefit plants? A review of evidence. - Am. Nat. 127: 870-892.
5. Benner, B. L. 1988. Effects of apex removal and nutrient supplementation on branching and seed production in Thlaspi arvense (Brassicaceae). - Am. J. Bot. 75: 645-651.
6. Bergelson, J. and Crawley, M. J. 1992a. Herbivory and Ipomopsis aggregata: the disadvantages of being eaten. - Am. Nat. 139: 870-882.
7. Bergelson, J. and Crawley, M. J. 1992b. The effects of grazers on the performance of individuals and populations of scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. - Oecologia 90: 435-444.
8. Bonser, S. P. and Aarssen, L. W. 1996. Meristem allocation: a new classification theory for adaptive strategies in herbaceous plants. - Oikos 77: 347-352.
9. Brodie, E. D. III, Moore, A. J. and Janzen, F. J. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 10: 313-318.
10. Crawley, M. J. 1987. Benevolent herbivores? - Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 167-168.
11. Duffy, N. M., Bonser, S. P. and Aarssen, L. W. 1999. Patterns of variation in meristem allocation across genotypes and species in monocarpic Brassicacea. - Oikos 84: 284-292.
12. Geber, M. A. 1990. The cost of meristem limitation in Polygonum arestnastru- negative genetic correlations between fecundity and growth. - Evolution 44: 799-819.
13. Gómez, J. M. 2003. Herbivory reduces the strength of pollinator-mediated selection in the Mediterranean Herb Erysimum mediohispanicum: consequences for plant specialization. - Am. Nat. 162: 242-256.
14. Harris, P. 1974. A possible explanation of plant yield increases following insect damage. - Agro-Ecosystems 1: 219-225.
15. Hawkes, C. V. and Sullivan, J. J. 2001. The impact of herbovory on plants in different resource conditions: a meta-analysis. - Ecology 82: 2045-2058.
16. Huhta, A-P., Hellström, K., Rautio, P. et al. 2000a. A test of the compensatory continuum: fertilization increases and below-ground competition decreases tolerance of tall wormseed mustard (Erysimum strictum). - Evol. Ecol. 14: 353-372.
17. Huhta, A-P., Lennartson, T., Tuomi, J. et al. 2000b. Tolerance of Gentianella campestris in relation to damage intensity: an interplay between apical dominance and herbivory. - Evol. Ecol. 14: 373-392.
18. Huhta, A-P., Tuomi, J. and Rautio, P. 2000c. Costs of apical dominance in two monocarbic herbs, Erysimum strictum and Rhinanthus minor. - Can. J. Bot. 78: 591-599.
19. Irwin, D. L. and Aarssen, L. W. 1996. Effects of nutrient level on cost and benefit of apical dominance in Epilobium ciliatum. - Am. Midl. Nat. 136: 14-28.
20. Järemo, J., Nilsson, P. and Tuomi, J. 1996. Plant compensatory growth: herbivory or competition? - Oikos 77: 238-247.
21. Juenger, T. and Bergelson, J. 1997. Pollen and resource limitation of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata. - Ecology 78: 1684-1695.
22. Juenger, T. and Bergelson, J. 2000. The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. - Evolution 54: 764-777.
23. Juenger, T., Lennartsson, T. and Tuomi, J. 2000. The evolution of tolerance to damage in Gentianella campestris: natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. - Evol. Ecol. 14: 393-419.
24. Lande, R. and Arnold, S. J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. - Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
25. Lehtilä, K. 1999. Impact of herbivore tolerance and resistance on plant life histories. - In: Vuorisalo, T. and Mutikainen, P. (eds), Life history evolution in plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 303-328.
26. Lehtilä, K. 2000. Modelling compensatory regrowth with bud dormancy and gradual activation of buds. - Evol. Ecol. 14: 315-330.
27. Lennartsson, T., Tuomi, J. and Nilsson, P. 1997. Evidence for the evolutionary history of overcompensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). - Am. Nat. 149: 1147-1155.
28. Lennartsson, T., Nilsson, P. and Tuomi, J. 1998. Induction of overcompensation in the field gentian, Gentianella campestris. - Ecology 79: 1061-1072.
29. Levine, M. T. and Paige, K. N. 2004. Direct and indirect effects of drought on compensation following herbivory in scarlet gilia. - Ecology 85: 3185-3191.
30. Maschinski, J. and Whitham, T. G. 1989. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability and timing. - Am. Nat. 134: 1-19.
31. van der Meijden, E. 1990. Herbivory as a trigger for growth. - Funct. Ecol. 4: 597-598.
32. van der Meijden, E., Wijn, M. and Verkaar, H. J. 1988. Defence and regrowth, alternative plant strategies in the struggle against herbivores. - Oikos 51: 355-363.
33. Montgomery, D. C. 1984. Design and analysis or experiments, 2nd ed. - John Wiley & Sons.
34. Mopper, S., Maschinski, J., Cobb, N. et al. 1991. A new look at habitat structure: consequences of herbivore-modified plant architecture. - In: Bell, S. S., McCoy, E. D. and Muschinsky, H. R. (eds), Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapham and Hall, pp. 260-280.
35. Nilsson, P., Tuomi, J. and Åström, M. 1996a. Bud dormancy as a bet-hedging strategy. - Am. Nat. 147: 269-281.
36. Nilsson, P., Tuomi, J. and Åström, M. 1996b. Even repeated grazing may select for overcompesation. - Ecology 77: 1942-1946.
37. Paige, K. N. and Whitham, T. G. 1987. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantage of being eaten. - Am. Nat. 129: 407-416.
38. Phillips, P. C. and Arnold, S. J. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. - Evolution 43: 1209-1222.
39. Reader, R. J. 1993. Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some old-field species. - J. Ecology 81: 169-175.
40. Seger, J. and Brockman, J. 1987. What is bet-hedging? - Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 4: 182-211.
41. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. - Freeman.
42. Stowe, K., Marquis, R. J., Hochwender, C. G. et al. 2000. The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 565-595.
43. Thomson, K. and Grime, J. P. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. - J. Ecology 67: 893-921.
44. van Tienderen, P. 1997. Generalists, specialists, and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity in sympatric populations of distinct species. - Evolution 51: 1372-1380.
45. Tuomi, J., Nilsson, P. and Åström, M. 1994. Plant compensatory responses: bud dormancy as an adaptation to herbivory. - Ecology 75: 1429-1436.
46. Vail, S. P. 1992. Selection for overcompensatory plant responses to herbivory: a mechanism for the evolution of plant-herbivore mutualism. - Am. Nat. 139: 1-8.
47. Via, S. 1987. Genetic constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. - In: Loeschcke, V. (ed.), Genetic constraints on adaptive evolution. Springer-Verlag, pp. 47-71.
48. Via, S. and Lande, R. 1985. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. - Evolution 39: 505-523.
49. Watson, M. A. 1986. Integrated physiological units in plants. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 1: 119-123.
50. Whitham, T. G., Maschinski, J., Larson, K. C. et al. 1991. Plant responses to herbivory: the continuum from negative to positive and the underlying physiological mechanisms. - In: Price, P. W., Lewinsohn, G. T. W., Fernandes, W. et al. (eds), Plant-animal interactions: evolutionary ecology in tropical and temperate regions. John Wiley and Sons, pp. 227-256.