Comparison of virtual reality versus physical reality on movement characteristics of persons with Parkinson's disease: Effects of moving targets

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 92, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1238-1245

  Wang, Ching Yi ^a,c   Hwang, Wen Juh ^b   Fang, Jing Jing ^b   Sheu, Ching Fan ^b   Leong, Iat Fai ^b   Ma, Hui Ing ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c KAOHSIUNG MUNICIPAL UNITED HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Parkinson disease; Rehabilitation; Task performance and analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINEMATICS; LABORATORY; MALE; PARKINSON DISEASE; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; PHYSICAL REALITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNIVERSITY; VELOCITY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; PARKINSON DISEASE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79961030209     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alves G, Forsaa EB, Pedersen KF, Dreetz Gjerstad M, Larsen JP. Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 2008;255(Suppl 5):18-32.
2. Muslimovic D, Post B, Speelman JD, Schmand B, de Haan RJ, Group CS. Determinants of disability and quality of life in mild to moderate Parkinson disease. Neurology 2008;70:2241-7.
3. Behrman AL, Cauraugh JH, Light KE. Practice as an intervention to improve speeded motor performance and motor learning in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci 2000;174:127-36. (Pubitemid 30155902)
4. Morris ME, Iansek R. Characteristics of motor disturbance in Parkinson's disease and strategies for movement rehabilitation. Hum Mov Sci 1996;15:649-69. (Pubitemid 126166549)
5. Nieuwboer A, Kwakkel G, Rochester L, et al. Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson's disease: the RESCUE trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:134-40. (Pubitemid 46220208)
6. del Olmo MF, Arias P, Furio MC, Pozo MA, Cudeiro J. Evaluation of the effect of training using auditory stimulation on rhythmic movement in Parkinsonian patients-a combined motor and [18F]-FDG PET study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2006;12:155-64.
7. Chuma T, Faruque Reza M, Ikoma K, Mano Y. Motor learning of hands with auditory cue in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm 2006;113:175-85. (Pubitemid 43121753)
8. Rochester L, Burn DJ, Woods G, Godwin J, Nieuwboer A. Does auditory rhythmical cueing improve gait in people with Parkinson's disease and cognitive impairment? A feasibility study. Mov Disord 2009;24:839-45.
9. Ma HI, Trombly CA, Tickle-Degnen L, Wagenaar RC. Effect of one single auditory cue on movement kinematics in patients with Parkinson's disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83:530-6. (Pubitemid 38802323)
10. Nowak DA, Tisch S, Hariz M, Limousin P, Topka H, Rothwell JC. Sensory timing cues improve akinesia of grasping movements in Parkinson's disease: a comparison to the effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation. Mov Disord 2006;21:166-72.
11. Kelly VE, Hyngstrom AS, Rundle MM, Bastian AJ. Interaction of levodopa and cues on voluntary reaching in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2002;17:38-44. (Pubitemid 36041258)
12. Schenk T, Baur B, Steude U, Botzel K. Effects of deep brain stimulation on prehensile movements in PD patients are less pronounced when external timing cues are provided. Neuropsychologia 2003;41:783-94. (Pubitemid 36287322)
13. Majsak MJ, Kaminski T, Gentile AM, Gordon AM. Effects of a moving target versus a temporal constraint on reach and grasp in patients with Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol 2008;210:479-88.
14. Majsak MJ, Kaminski T, Gentile AM, Flanagan JR. The reaching movements of patients with Parkinson's disease under self-determined maximal speed and visually cued conditions. Brain 1998;121:755-66. (Pubitemid 28162134)
15. Weiss PL, Rand D, Katz N, Kizony R. Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004;1:12-23.
16. Keshner EA. Virtual reality and physical rehabilitation: a new toy or a new research and rehabilitation tool? J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004;1:8-9.
17. Martin O, Julian B, Boissieux L, Gascuel JD, Prablanc C. Evaluating online control of goal-directed arm movement while standing in virtual visual environment. J Visual Comp Anim 2003;14:253-60. (Pubitemid 40930250)
18. Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, Levin MF. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004;1:11-7.
19. Kuhlen T, Kraiss KF, Steffan R. How VR-based reach-to-grasp experiments can help to understand movement organization within the human brain. Presence 2000;9:350-9.
20. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
21. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967;17:427-42.
22. Nelson WL. Physical principles for economies of skilled movements. Biol Cybern 1983;46:135-47. (Pubitemid 13125561)
23. Ma HI, Hwang WJ, Chen-Sea MJ, Sheu CF. Handle size as a task constraint in spoon-use movement in patients with Parkinson's disease. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:520-8.
24. Flowers K. Ballistic and corrective movements on an aiming task: Intention tremor and parkinsonian movement disorders compared. Neurology 1975;25:413-21.
25. Ma HI, Hwang WJ, Lin KC. The effects of two different auditory stimuli on functional arm movement in persons with Parkinson's disease: a dual-task paradigm. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:229-37.
26. Arbib MA. Schemas for the temporal organization of behaviour. Hum Neurobiol 1985;4:63-72. (Pubitemid 15031148)
27. Ma HI, Hwang WJ, Tsai PL, Hsu YW. The effect of eating utensil weight on functional arm movement in people with Parkinson's disease: a controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:1086-92.
28. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 6th ed. Belmont: Thomson; 2006.
29. Bartels A, Zeki S, Logothetis NK. Natural vision reveals regional specialization to local motion and to contrast-invariant, global flow in the human brain. Cereb Cortex 2008;18:705-17. (Pubitemid 351264241)
30. Moutoussis K, Zeki S. Motion processing, directional selectivity, and conscious visual perception in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:16362-7.
31. Newell KM. Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade MC, Whiting HTA, editors. Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff; 1986. p 341-60.
32. Magill RA. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. 9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.
33. Nieuwboer A, Rochester L, Muncks L, Swinnen SP. Motor learning in Parkinson's disease: limitations and potential for rehabilitation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2009;15(Suppl 3):S53-8.
34. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005;8:187-211. (Pubitemid 40847797)