Pupil mobility and school disruption

Journal of Public Economics

Volumn 95, Issue 9-10, 2011, Pages 1156-1167

  Gibbons, Stephen ^a   Telhaj, Shqiponja ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Externalities; Mobility; Student achievement

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961026687     PISSN: 00472727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abowd John, Creecy Robert, Kramarz Francis Computing person and firm effects using linked longitudinal employer-employee data. Cornell University Working Paper 2002.
2. ALG Breaking point: examining the disruption caused by pupil mobility 2005, Association of London Government, http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/London%20Councils/ALGmobilityreportfinal.pdf.
3. Alston Colin Pupil mobility in hackney schools - facts, implications and strategic responses. Paper presented to the Education Committee of the London Borough of Hackney, 19 June 2000.
4. Angrist Joshua, Lang Kevin Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco program. The American Economic Review 2004, 94(5):1613-1634.
5. Carrel Scott, Hoekstra Mark Externalities in the classroom: how children exposed to domestic violence affect everyone's kids. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2010, 2(1):211-228.
6. Demie Feysia Pupil mobility and educational achievement in schools: an empirical analysis. Educational Research 2001, 44(2):197-215.
7. Demie Feysia, Lewis Kirstin, Taplin Anne Pupil mobility in schools and implications for raising achievement. Educational Research 2005, 31(2).
8. Department for Education and Skills Managing Pupil Mobility: Guidance 2003, DfES, Nottingham.
9. Dobson Janet, Pooley Claire Mobility, Equality, Diversity: A Study of Pupil Mobility in the Secondary School System 2004, UCL, Migration Research Unit, London.
10. Dobson Janet M., Henthorne Kirsty, Lynas Zoë Pupil Mobility in Schools Final Report 2000, University College London Migration Research Unit, London.
11. Douglas James The Home and the School 1964, MacGibbon and Kee, London.
12. Gibbons S., Telhaj S. Peers and Achievement in England's Secondary Schools 2008, Spatial Economics Research Centre SERC DP 0001, June.
13. Gould Eric, Lavy Victor, Paserman M.Daniele Does immigration affect the long-term educational outcomes of natives? Quasi-experimental evidence. NBER Working Papers 10844 2004, National Bureau of Economic Research.
14. Greater London Authority Moving home and changing school - 1: widening the analysis of pupil mobility. Data Management and Analysis Briefing 2005/32 2005.
15. Hanushek Eric A., Kain John F., Rivkin Steven G. Disruption versus Tiebout improvement: the costs and benefits of switching schools. Journal of Public Economics 2004, 88(9-10):1721-1746.
16. Hoxby, Caroline, and Gretchen Weingarth (2005). Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects, Harvard University manuscript.
17. Kane Thomas J., Staiger Douglas Improving school accountability measures. NBER working paper W8156 2001.
18. Lavy Victor, Schlosser Analia Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 13292 2007.
19. Lavy Victor, Paserman M.Daniele, Schlosser Analia Inside the black box of ability. Peer effects: evidence from variation in high and low achievers in the classroom. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 14415 2008.
20. Machin Stephen, Telhaj Shqiponja, Wilson Joan The mobility of English school children. Fiscal Studies 2006, 27(3):253-280.
21. Manski, Charles (1993).
22. Manski, Charles (2000).
23. Office for Standards in Education Managing Pupil Mobility 2002, Ofsted, London.
24. Perlstein, Linda (2001) Schools struggle with high student turnover, Washington Post, April 5th, T.03.
25. Pribesh Shana, Downey Douglas B. Why are residential and school moves associated with poor school performance. Demography 1999, 36(4):521-534.
26. Strand Steve Pupil mobility, attainment and progress during key stage 1: a study in cautious interpretation. British Educational Research Journal 2002, 28(1):63-78.
27. Strand Steve, Demie Feysia Pupil mobility, attainment and progress in primary school. British Educational Research Journal 2006, 32(4):551-568.
28. Todd Petra E., Wolpin Kenneth I. On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. Economic Journal 2003, 113(485):F3-F33.