The network autocorrelation model using two-mode data: Affiliation exposure and potential bias in the autocorrelation parameter

Social Networks

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 231-243

  Fujimoto, Kayo ^a   Chou, Chih Ping ^a   Valente, Thomas W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Affiliation exposure; Autocorrelation parameter; Biasness; Network autocorrelation model; Network exposure model; Simulation; Two mode network data

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960991316     PISSN: 03788733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2011.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Agneessens F., Roose H., Waege H. Choices of theatre events: p* model for affiliation networks with attributes. Metodoloski zvezki 2004, 1(2):419-439.
2. Alexander C., Piazza M., Mekos D., Valente T.W. Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health 2001, 29(1):22-30.
3. Anselin L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models 1988, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht.
4. Anselin L. Some robust approaches to testing and estimation in spatial econometrics. Regional Science and Urban Economics 1990, 20:141-163.
5. Bonacich P. Technique for analyzing overlapping memberships. Sociological Methodology 1972, 4:176-185.
6. Bonacich P. Using boolean algebra to analyze overlapping memberships. Sociological Methodology 1978, 9:101-115.
7. Bonacich P. Simultaneous group and individual centralities. Social Networks 1991, 13(2):155-168.
8. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G. Regular blockmodels of multiway, multimode matrices. Social Networks 1992, 14:91-120.
9. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G. Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks 1997, 19:243-269.
10. Breiger R.L. The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces 1974, 53(2):181-190.
11. Burt R.S. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 1987, 92:1287-1335.
12. Butts C.T. Social Network Analysis with sna. Journal of Statistical Software 2008, 24(6):1-51.
13. Cleveland H.H., Wiebe R.P. The moderation of adolescent-to-peer similarity in tobacco and alcohol use by school levels of substance use. Child Development 2003, 74(1):279-291.
14. Cleveland H.H., Wiebe R.P., Rowe D.C. Sources of exposure to smoking and drinking friends among adolescents: a behavioral-genetic evaluation. The Jounial of Genetic Psychology 2005, 166(2):153-169.
15. Conyon, M.J., Muldoom, M.R., 2004. The small world network structure of boards of directors. from SSRN preprint. http://ssrn.com/abstract=546963.
16. Crosnoe R. Academic and health-related trajectories in adolescence: the intersection of gender and athletics. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 2002, 43:317-335.
17. Crosnoe R. The connection between academic failure and adolescent drinking in secondary school. Sociology of Education 2006, 79(1):44-60.
18. Crosnoe R., Muller C., Frank K. Peer context and the consequences of adolescent drinking. Social Problems 2004, 51(2):288-304.
19. Davis A., Gardner B.B., Gardner M.R. Deep South: A Social Anthropological Study of Caste and Class 1941, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
20. Davis G.F., Mizruchi M.S. The money centre cannot hold: commercial banks in the U.S. system of corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly 1999, 44:215-239.
21. Doreian P. Linear models with spatially distributed data. Sociological Methods and Research 1980, 9:29-60.
22. Doreian P. On the evolution of group and network structure. Social Networks 1980, 2:235-252.
23. Doreian P. Estimating linear models with spatially distributed data. Sociological Methodology 1981, 359-388. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. S. Leinhardt (Ed.).
24. Doreian P. Network autocorrelation models: problems and prospects. Spatial Statistics: Past, Present, and Future, Monograph 1990, vol. 12:369-389. Institute of Mathematical Geography, Ann Arbor.
25. Doreian P., Batagelj V., Ferligoj A. Generalized blockmodeling of twomode network data. Social Networks 2004, 26:29-53.
26. Doreian P., Teuter K., Wang C.-S. Network autocorrelation models: some Monte Carlo results. Sociological Methods and Research 1984, 13:155-200.
27. Dow M.M. A bi-parametric approach to network autocorrelation: Galton's problem. Sociological Methods and Research 1984, 13:201-217.
28. Dow M.M. Galton's problem as multiple network autocorrelation effects: cultural trait transmission and ecological constraint. Cross-Cultural Research 2007, 41(4):336-363.
29. Dow M.M. Network autocorrelation regression with binary and ordinal depedent variables. Cross-Cultural Research 2008, 42(4):394-419.
30. Dow M.M., Burton M., White D., Reitz K. Galton's problem as network autocorrelation. American Ethnologist 1984, 11:754-770.
31. Dow M.M., Burton M.L., White D.R. Network autocorrelation: a simulation study of a foundational problem in regression and survey research. Social Networks 1982, 4:169-200.
32. Faust K. Centrality in affiliation networks. Social Networks 1997, 19:157-191.
33. Faust K. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York.
34. Faust K., Willert K.E., Rowlee D.D., Skovretz J. Scaling and statistical models for affiliation networks: patterns of participation among Soviet politicians during the Brezhne era. Social Networks 2002, 24:231-259.
35. Ferrer R., Sole R.V. The small-world of human language. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2001, 268:261-2265.
36. Field S., Frank K.A.S.K., Riegle-Crumba C., Mullera C. Identifying positions from affiliation networks: preserving the duality of people and events. Social Networks 2006, 28:97-123.
37. Freeman L.C. Q-Analysis and the structure of friendship networks. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 1980, (12):367-378.
38. Freeman L.C., White D.R. Using Galois lattices to represent network data. Sociological Methodology 1993, 23:127-146.
39. Fujimoto, K., Unger, J., Valente, T.W. forthcoming. Network method of measuring affiliation-based peer influence: assessing the influences on teammates smokers on adolescent smoking. Child Development.
40. Getis A., Ord J.K. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis 1992, 24:189-206.
41. Guillaume J.-L., Le Blond S., Latapy M. Bipartite structure of all complex networks. Informaiton Processing Letters (IPL) 2004, 90(5):215-221.
42. Hall J.A., Valente T.W. Adolescent smoking networks: the effects of influence and selection on future smoking. Addictive Behaviors 2007, 32(12):3054-3059.
43. Haynie D.L. Delinquent peers revisited: does network structure matter?. American Journal of Sociology 2001, 106(4):1013-1057.
44. Johnston J. Econometric Methods 1984, McGraw-Hill, New York. 2nd ed., International Student Edition ed.
45. Kelejian H., Prucha I. A generalized two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 1998, 17:99-121.
46. Land K., Deane G. On the large-sample estimation of regression models with spatialor network-effects terms: a two-stage least squares approach. Sociological Methodology 1992, 221-248. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. P. Marsden (Ed.).
47. Latapy M., Magnien C., Vecchio N.D. Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks. Social Networks 2008, 30:31-48.
48. Leenders R.A.J. Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks 2002, 24:21-47.
49. LeSage J.P. Bayesian estimation of spatial autoregressive models. International Regional Science Review 1997, 20:113-129.
50. Marsden P., Friedkin N.E. Network studies of social influence. Sociological Method & Research 1993, 22(1):127-151.
51. McPherson J.M. Hypernetwork sampling: duality and differentiation among voluntary organizations. Social Networks 1982, 3:225-249.
52. Mizruchi M.S. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology 1996, 22:271-298.
53. Mizruchi M.S., Neuman E.J. The effect of density on the level of bias in the network autocorrelation model. Social Networks 2008, 30:190-200.
54. Neuman E.J., Mizruchi M.S. Structure and bias in the network autocorrelation model. Social Networks 2010, 32:290-300.
55. Newman M.E.J. Clustering an preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E 2001, 64. 025102-025101-025104.
56. Newman M.E.J. Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E 2001, 64:016131.
57. Newman M.E.J. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E 2001, 64:016132.
58. Newman M.E.J., Strogatz S.H., Watts D.J. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Physical Review E 2001, 64. 026118-026111-026117.
59. Newman M.E.J., Watts D.J., Strogatz S.H. Random graph models of social networks. PNAS 2002, 99(Suppl. 1):2566-2572.
60. Ord K. Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1975, 70:120-126.
61. Paez A., Darren S.M., Volz E. Weight matrices for social influence analysis: an investigation of measurement errors and their effect on model identification and estimation quality. Social Networks 2008, 30:309-317.
62. Roberts J.M. Correspondence analysis of two-mode network data. Social Networks 2000, 22:65-72.
63. Robins G., Alexander M. Small worlds among interlocking directors: network structure and distance in bipartite graphs. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 2004, 10:69-94.
64. Roth C., Bourgine P. Epistemic communities: description and hierarchic categorization. Mathematical Population Studies 2005, 12(2):107-130.
65. Skovretz J., Faust K. Logit models for affiliation networks. Sociological Methodology 1999, 29:253-280.
66. Smith T.E. Aggregation bias in maximum likelihood estimation of spatial autoregressive processes. Spatial Econometrics and Spatial Statistics 2004, 53-88. Macmillan, New York. A. Getis, J. Mur, H. Zoller (Eds.).
67. Smith T.E. Estimation bias in spatial models with strongly connected weight matrices. Geographical Analysis 2009, 41(3):307-332.
68. Tiefelsdorf M., Griffith D.A., Boots B. A variance-stabilizing coding scheme for spatial link matrices. Environment and Planning A 1999, 31:165-180.
69. Valente T.W. Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations 1995, Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.
70. Valente T.W. Network models and methods for studying the diffusion of innovations. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis: Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences 2005, 98-116. Cambridge University Press, New York. P.J. Carrington, J. Scott, S. Wasserman (Eds.).
71. Wang P., Sharpe K., Robins G., Pattison P. Exponential random graph (p Wang P., Sharpe K., Rob) models for affiliation networks. Social Networks 2009, 31(1):12-25.
72. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications 1994, Cambridge University Press, New York.
73. Watts D.J., Strogatz S.H. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 1998, 393:440-442.