Comparison of the efficacy of articaine and prilocaine local anaesthesia for pulpotomy of maxillary and mandibular primary molars

European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 117-122

  Yilmaz, Y ^a   Eyuboglu, O ^b   Keles, S ^a  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Department of Pediatric Dentistry   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Dental local anaesthesia; Mandibular nerve block; Maxillary infiltration; Pulpotomy

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; ARTICAINE; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM DERIVATIVE; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; FERRIC ION; FERRIC SULFATE; FORMOCRESOL; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; MINERAL TRIOXIDE AGGREGATE; OXIDE; PRILOCAINE; SILICATE; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG COMBINATION; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NERVE BLOCK; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALUMINUM COMPOUNDS; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; CALCIUM HYDROXIDE; CARTICAINE; CHILD; DENTAL CEMENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; DRUG COMBINATIONS; FEMALE; FERRIC COMPOUNDS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORMOCRESOLS; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MAXILLA; MOLAR; NERVE BLOCK; OXIDES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRILOCAINE; PULP CAPPING AND PULPECTOMY AGENTS; PULPOTOMY; RUBBER DAMS; SILICATES; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79960946503     PISSN: 1591996X     EISSN: 2035648X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andlow RJ, Rock WP. Local anaesthesia. In: Andlow RJ, Rock WP, editors. A Manual of Paedodontics. Churchill Livingstone.pp.63-75.
2. Buriç N, Tijaniç M. Review and analysis of vasoconstrictors in local anesthetics applied in orofacial surgery. Acta Stomatol Nais 2003;19:43.
3. Donaldson D, James-Perdok L, Craig BJ, Derkson GD, Richardson AS. A comparison Ultracaine DS (articaine HCl) and Citanest forte (prilocaine HCl) in maxillary infiltration and mandibular nerve block. J Can Dent Assoc 1987; 53:38-42.
4. Finder RL, Moore PA. Adverse drug reactions to local anesthetic. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46:747-57.
5. Gurbuz T. Pain related to mechanical and chemomechanical removal of caries in children. The Pain Clinic 2004;16:275-80.
6. Haas DA, Harper DG, Saso MA, Young ER. Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches. Anesth Prog 1990;37:230-7.
7. Hargreaves KM, Keiser K. Local anesthetic failure in endodontics. Endodontic Topics 2002;1:26-39.
8. Kayaalp O. Lokal anestezikler. In: Kayaalp O, editor. Tibbi Farmakoloji. Hacettepe-Tafl Co.2002.pp. 792-806.
9. Kidd EAM, Smith BGN. Treatment techniques. In: Kidd EAM, Smith BGN, eds. Pickard's Manual of Operative Dentistry. Oxford University Press.1990 pp. 86-98.
10. MacKenzie TA, Young ER. Local anaesthetic update. Anesth Prog 1993; 40:29-34.
11. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Efficiacy of articaine: A new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc 2000a;131:635-42.
12. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients. Paediatr Dent 2000b;22:307-11
13. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dental Assoc 2001;132:177-85.
14. McDonald RE, Avery DR. Local anesthesia for the child and adolescent. In: McDonald RE, Aver DR, editors. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. Mosby Co. 2000; pp. 283-96.
15. Meechan JG. Local anesthesia for children. In:Welbury RR, editor. Paediatric Dentistry. Oxford University Press.2001. pp. 77-92.
16. Nakanishi O, Haas D, Ishikawa T, Kameyama S, Nishi M. Efficacy of mandibular topical anesthesia varies with the site of administration. Anesth Prog 1996; 43:14-19.
17. Nusstein JM, Beck M. Effectiveness of 20% benzocaine as a topical anesthetic for intraoral injections. Anesth Prog 2003; 50: 159-16.
18. Oliveira PC, Volpato MC, Ramacciato JC, Ranali J. Articaine and lignocaine efficiency in infiltration anaesthesia: a pilot study. Br Dent J 2004;197:45-6.
19. Oulis CJ, Vadiakas GP, Vasilopoulou A. The effectiveness of mandibular infiltration compared to mandibular block anesthesia in treating primary molars in children. Paediatr Dent 1996;18:301-5.
20. Ram D, Peretz B. Reactions of children to maxillary infiltration and mandibular block injections. Paediatr Dent 2001;23:343-6.
21. Ram D, Hermida L, Peretz B. A comparison of warmed and room-temperature anesthetic for local anesthesia in children. Paediatr Dent 2002;24:333-6.
22. Rogers KB,Fielding AF,Markiewicks SW. The effect of warming local anesthetic solutions prior to injections.Gen Dent 1989;37:496-499.
23. Sharaf AA. Evaluation of mandibular infiltration versus block anesthesia in pediatric dentistry. J Dent Child 1997;64:276-81.
24. Speca SJ. ,Boynes SG. ,Cuddy MA. Allergic Reactions to Local Anesthetic Formulations.Dent Clin N Am 2010;54:655-664.
25. Ulukapi I, Ilhan B, Bakirgil J, Iflsever H. Ilkokul çocuklari{dotless}nda diflhekimi korkusunun incelenmesi. Akademik Dental Diflhek Derg 2001;3:48-52.
26. Wahl MJ, Schmitt MM, Overton DA, Gordon MK. Injection pain of bupivacaine with epinephrine vs. prilocaine plain. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:1652-56.
27. Wright GZ,Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O. The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Pediatr Dent 1991;13:278-83.
28. Wright GZ. Psychologic management of children's behaviours. In: McDonald RE, Avery DR, editors. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. Philadelphia: Mosby Co: 2000; p. 34-51.
29. Yassen GH. Evaluation of mandibular infiltration versus mandibular block anaesthesia in treating primary canines in children. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 2010;20:43-49.