A comparison between Articaine HCl and Lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 307-311

  Malamed, Stanley F ^a   Gagnon, Suzanne ^a   Leblanc, Dominique ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICAINE; LIDOCAINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ANESTHESIA; DENTAL CARE; DOSE RESPONSE; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAFETY; TIME;

ANESTHESIA, DENTAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; CARTICAINE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DENTAL CARE FOR CHILDREN; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIDOCAINE; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SAFETY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034218746     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ferger P, Marxkors R: Ein neues Anasthetikum in der zahnarztlichen Prosthetik. Dtsch. Zahnarztl. Z. 28:87-89, 1973.
2. Vree TB, Baars AM, van Oss GE, Booij LH: High performance liquid chromatography and preliminary pharmacokinetics of articaine and its 2-carboxy metabolite in human serum and urine. J Chromatogr 424(2):440-44, 1988.
3. th Ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1997, pp 63-64.
4. Winther JE, Nathalang B: Effectivity of a new local analgesic Hoe 40 045. Scand J Dent Res 80:272-78, 1972.
5. Winther JE, Patirupanusara B: Evaluation of carticaine - a new local analgesic. Int J Oral Surg 3:422-27, 1974.
6. Raab WHM, Muller R, Muller HF: Comparative studies on the anesthetic efficiency of 2% and 4% articaine. Quintessence 41(7):1208-16, 1990.
7. Ruprecht S, Knoll-Kohler E: Comparative study of equimolar solutions of lidocaine and articaine for anesthesia. A randomized, double-blind cross-over study. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 101(10):1286-90, 1991.
8. Raab WHM, Reithmayer K, Muller HF: A process for testing anesthetics. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 45(10):629-32, 1990.
9. Haas DA, Harper DG, Saso MA, Young ER: Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches. Anesth Prog 37:230-37, 1990.
10. Lemay H, Albert G, HJlie P, Dufour L, Gagnon P, Payant L, LalibertJ R: L'articaine en dentisterie operatoire conventionnelle. Le Chirugien Dentiste de Frsnce 281(92):39-43, 1985.
11. Cowan A: Clinical assessment of a new local anesthetic agent-carticaine. Oral Surg 43(2):174-80, 1977.
12. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Liu SY, Lippman H, Zeig S, Leblanc D: A Phase II study to evaluate safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a single dose and multiple doses of 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine in healthy subjects. In preparation.
13. Dudkiewicz A, Schwartz S, LalibertJ R: Effectiveness of mandibular infiltration anesthesia in children using the local anesthetic Ultracaine® (articaine hydrochloride). J Canad Dent Assoc 1:29-31, 1987.
14. Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Marti R, Plotzke O: The effectiveness of infiltration anesthesia in the mandibular primary molar region. Ped Dentistry 13(5):278-83, 1991.
15. Donaldson D, James-Perdok L, Craig BJ, Derkson GD, Richardson AS: A comparison of Ultracaine DS (articaine HCl) and Citanest Forte (prilocaine HCl) in maxillary infiltration and mandibular nerve block. J Can Dent Assoc 53(1):38-42, 1987.
16. Wright GZ, Weinberger SJ, Friedman CS, Plotske OB: The use of articaine local anesthesia in children under 4 years of age. - a retrospective report. Anesth. Prog. 36:268-71, 1989.Table 1. Stratification by Procedure.