Articaine and lignocaine efficiency in infiltration anaesthesia: A pilot study

British Dental Journal

Volumn 197, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 45-46

  Oliveira, P C ^a   Volpato, M C ^a   Ramacciato, J C ^a   Ranali, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; ARTICAINE; LIDOCAINE;

ADULT; ANALYTICAL EQUIPMENT; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CANINE TOOTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DATA ANALYSIS; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG ACTIVITY; DRUG RESPONSE; DRUG SCREENING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INJECTION; MALE; MOUTH; NORMAL HUMAN; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PALATE; PILOT STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANK SUM TEST; SOFT TISSUE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH PULP; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, DENTAL; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; CARTICAINE; CHEEK; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DENTAL PULP TEST; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FACIAL PAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INJECTIONS; LIDOCAINE; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PALATE, HARD; PILOT PROJECTS;

EID: 3242735512     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811422     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Malamed S F. Handbook of local anesthesia. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby - Year Book, 1997, pp 63-64.
2. Malamed S F, et al. A comparision between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients. Ped Dent 2000; 22: 307-311.
3. Lipp M, Daublander M. The German experience of articaine. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on local analgesia in dentistry. London: Faculty of General Dental Practitioners, 1999, 21-22.
4. Sloss D R. Articaine in dental practice. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on local analgesia in dentistry. London: Faculty of General Dental Practitioners, 1999, 23-24.
5. Hass D A, et al. Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches. Anesth Prog 1990; 37: 230-237.
6. Goolkasian P. Cyclic changes in pain perception: an ROC analysis. Percept Psychophys 1980; 27: 499-504.
7. Vahatalo K, Antila H, Lehtinen R. Articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltration anaesthesia. Anesth Prog 1993; 40: 114-116.
8. Joyce C R B, et al. Comparasion of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1975; 8: 415-420.
9. Kremer E, Hampton Atkinson J, Ignelzi R J. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain 1981; 10: 241-248.
10. Jensen M P, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparasion of six methods. Pain 1986; 27: 117-126.
11. Newton J T, Buck D J. Anxiety and pain measures in dentistry: a guide to their quality and application. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 1449-1457.
12. Malamed S F, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Efficacy of articaine: a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131: 635-642.
13. Meechan J G, Blair G S. The effect of two different local anesthetic solutions on pain experience following apicectomy. Br Dent J 1993; 175: 410-413.
14. Primosch R E, Brooks R. Influence of anesthetic flow rate delivered by the Wand Local Anesthetic System on pain response to palatal injections. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 15-20.
15. Meechan J G. A comparision of ropivacaine end lidocaine with epinephrine for intraligamentary anesthesia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 469-473.