Challenges of interviewers' institutional positionings: Taking account of interview content and the interaction

Communication Methods and Measures

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 177-200

  Tracy, Karen ^a   Robles, Jessica S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960905863     PISSN: 19312458     EISSN: 19312466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2010.505501     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (Eds.). (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage.
2. Bloom, L. R. (1998). Under the sign of hope: Feminist methodology and narrative interpretation. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
3. Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S., & Associates. (1979). Improving interview method and questionnaire design: Response effects to threatening questions in survey interviews. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
4. Briggs, C. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Buttny, R., & Jensen, A. D. (1995). Telling problems in an initial family therapy session: The hierarchical organization of problem-talk. In G. H. Morris & R. J. Chenail (Eds.), The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse (pp. 19-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Carbaugh, D. (2008). Ethnography of communication. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), International encyclopedia of communication (Vol. IV, pp. 1592-1598). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
8. Clayman, S. E. (2007). Answers and evasions. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies (Vol. I, pp. 20-61). London: Sage.
9. Douglas, J. D. (1985). Creative interviewing. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 1-65). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Ehrlich, S., & Sidnell, J. (2006). "I think that's not an assumption you ought to make": Challenging presuppositions in inquiry testimony. Language in Society, 35, 655-676.
12. Ensink, T. (2003). The frame analysis of research interviews: Social categorization and footing in interview discourse. In H. van den Berg, M. Wetherell, & H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview (pp. 156-177). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Fontana, A. (2002). Postmodern trends in interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 161-173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
15. Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (Eds.). (2002). Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Gubruim, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2002). From the individual interview to the interview society. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 3-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Ho, E. Y., Calhoun, S. P., Kofsky, R., & Wilson, C. (2007). Effects of acupuncture and massage therapy treatment for HIV-related neuropathy in low-income community health care clients. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association, November 3-7, Washington, DC.
18. Ho, E. Y., Wilson, C., & Kofsky, R. (2006). Targeting HIV-related neuropathy with acupuncture and massage therapy. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association, November 4-8, Boston, MA.
19. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1997). Active interviewing. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: theory, method and practice (pp. 113-129). London: Sage.
20. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the standardized survey interview. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., & Antaki, C. (1997). Creating happy people by asking yes-no questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 285-313.
23. Keith, W. M. (2007). Democracy as discussion: Civic education and the American Forum movement. Lanaham, MD: Lexington Books.
24. Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions: Assertive questions in everyday interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
25. Kruger, R. A. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Maynard, D. W. (1991). Interaction and asymmetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 488-495.
28. Mead, N., & Bower, P. (2000). Patient-centeredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 1087-1110.
29. Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904-913.
30. Mishler, E. G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Greenwood Publishing Group.
31. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Mishler, E. G., & Troff, A. (1956). Status and interaction in a psychiatric hospital. Human Relations, 9, 187-205.
33. Morgan, D. L. (1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Morgan, D. L. (1998). The focus group guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Pomerantz, A. (2005). Using participants' video stimulated comments to complement analyses of interactional practices. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 93-113). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Pomerantz, A., & Zemel, A. (2003). Perspectives and frameworks in interviewers' queries. In H. van den Berg, M. Wetherell, & H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview (pp. 215-231). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37. Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (1999). Asking elaborate questions: Focus groups and the management of spontaneity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3, 314-335.
38. Puchta, C., & Potter, J. (2004). Focus group practice. London: Sage.
39. Robles, J. S., & Ho, E. Y. (2008a). Symbolic interaction in small-group interviews: Topic, context, and emergent "interactions in the moment. " Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association, February 16-18, Broomfield, CO.
40. Robles, J. S., & Ho, E. Y. (2008b). Intersecting practices in focus groups: Conditions for social interaction. Paper presented to the National Communication Association, November 21-24, San Diego, CA.
41. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (2 volumes). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
42. Sarangi, S. (2003). Institutional, professional, and lifeworld frames in interview talk. In H. van den Berg, M. Wetherell, & H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview (pp. 64-84). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
44. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
45. Steensig, J., & Larsen, T. (2008). Affiliative and disaffiliative uses of you-say-x questions. Discourse Studies, 10, 113-132.
46. Street, R. L., Gold, W. R., & McDowell, T. (1995). Discussing health-related quality of life in prenatal consultations. In G. H. Morris & R. J. Chenail (Eds.), The talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse (pp. 209-232). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47. Tracy, K. (2002). Everyday talk: Building and reflecting identities. New York: Guilford Press.
48. Tracy, K. (2008). "Reasonable hostility": Situation-appropriate face attack. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, and Culture, 4, 169-191.
49. Tracy, K. (2010). Challenges of ordinary democracy: A case study in deliberation and dissent. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
50. Tracy, K., & Ashcraft, C. (2001). Crafting policies about controversial values: How wording disputes manage a group dilemma. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29, 297-316.
51. Tracy, K., & Durfy, M. (2007). Speaking out in public: Citizen participation in contentious school board meetings. Discourse and Communication, 1, 223-249.
52. Tracy, K., & Mirivel, J. (2009). Discourse analysis: The practice and practical value of taping, transcribing, and analyzing. In L. Frey & K. Cissna (Eds.), Handbook of applied communication (pp. 153-177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Tracy, K., & Muller, H. (2001). Diagnosing a school board's interactional trouble: Theorizing problem formulating. Communication Theory, 11, 84-104.
54. Tracy, K., & Standerfer, C. (2003). Selecting a school superintendent: Sensitivities in group deliberation. In L. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 109-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. van den Berg, H., Wetherell, M., & Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2003). Introduction. In H. van den Berg, M. Wetherell, & H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview (pp. 1-11). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic, narrative, and semi-structured methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
57. Wetherell, M. (2003). Racism and the analysis of cultural resources in interviews. In H. van den Berg, M. Wetherell, & H. Houtkoop-Steenstra (Eds.), Analyzing race talk: Multidisciplinary approaches to the interview (pp. 11-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism. Hemel Hemspstead: Harvester.
59. Wilkerson, S. (2006). Analyzing interaction in focus groups. In P. Drew, G. Raymond, & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Talk and interaction in social research methods (pp. 50-62). London: Sage.
60. Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: Accounts of the paranormal. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
61. Wooffitt, R., & Widdicombe, S. (2006). Interaction in interviews. In P. Drew, G. Raymond, & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Talk and interaction in social research methods (pp. 28-49). London: Sage.
62. Zimmerman, D. (1998). Identity, context and interaction. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 87-106). London: Sage.