Institutional, professional, and lifeworld frames in interview talk

Analyzing Race Talk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Research Interview

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 64-84

  Sarangi, Srikant ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926989825     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511489792.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Baker, C. 1997. Membership categorization and interview accounts. In Qualitative research: theory, method, and practice, edited by D. Silverman. London: Sage. 130–143.
2. Brenner, M. 1978. Interviewing: the social phenomenology of a research instrument. In The social contexts of method, edited by M. Brenner, P. Marsh, and M. Brenner. London: Croom Helm. 122–139.
3. Boden, D. 1994. The business of talk: organization`ns in action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4. Briggs, C. L. 1986. Learning how to ask: a sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cicourel, A. V. 1964. Method and measurement in sociology. New York: Free Press.
6. Clayman, S. 1992. Footing in the achievement of neutrality: the case of news interview discourse. In Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings, edited by P. Drew and J. Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 235– 267.
7. Denzin, N. 1970. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Hawthorne, New York: Aldine.
8. Denzin, N. 1991. Representing lived experiences in ethnographic texts. Studies in Symbolic Interaction 12: 59–70.
9. Dillon, G. L., Doyle, A., Eastman, C., Schiffman, H., Silberstein, S., Toolan, M., Kline, S., and Phillipsen, G. 1989. Analysing a speech event: the Bush– Rather exchange. A (not very) dramatic dialogue. Cultural Anthropology 4, 1: 73–94.
10. Drew, P. and Heritage, J., editors. 1992. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Erickson, F. and Shultz, J. 1982. The counsellor as gatekeeper: social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press.
12. Essed, P. 1991. Understanding everyday racism: an interdisciplinary theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.
14. Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman.
15. Gaik, F. 1992. Radio talk-show therapy and the pragmatics of possible worlds. In Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon, edited by A. Duranti and C. Goodwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 271–290.
16. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
18. Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. 1995. Life course malleability: biographical work and deprivatisation. Sociological Inquiry 65: 207–223.
19. Gumperz, J. 1968. The speech community. In International encyclopaedia of the social sciences. London: Macmillan. 381–386.
20. Heath, C. 1992. The delivery and reception of diagnosis in the general practice consultation. In Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings, edited by P. Drew and J. Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 235–267.
21. Heritage, J. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Heritage, J. and Greatbatch, D. 1991. On the institutional character of institutional talk: the case of news interviews. In Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, edited by D. Boden and D. Zimmerman. Cambridge: Polity Press. 93–137.
23. Hester, S. and Francis, D. 1994. Doing data: the local organization of a sociological interview. British Journal of Sociology 45, 4: 675–695.
24. Holstein, J. A. and Gubrium, J. F. (1997) Active interviewing. In Qualitative research: theory, method, and practice, edited by D. Silverman. London: Sage. 113–129.
25. Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. 2000. Interaction and the standardized survey interview: the living questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Hutchby, I. and Wooffitt, R. 1998. Conversation analysis: principles, practices, and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
27. Labov, W. 1972. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1, 1: 97–120.
28. Hymes, D. 1964. Introduction: towards ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist 66, 2: 12–25.
29. Jefferson, G. and Lee, J. R. E. 1981. The rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a “troubles teller” and a “service encounter.” Journal of Pragmatics 5: 399–422.
30. Levinson, S. 1979. Activity types and language. Language 17: 5–6, 365–399.
31. Linguistic Minorities Project (LMP) 1985. The other languages of England. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
32. McHugh, P. 1968. Defining the situation: the organisation of meaning in social interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
33. Miller, J. and Glassner, B. 1997. The “inside” and the “outside”: finding realities in interviews. In Qualitative research: theory, method and practice, edited by D. Silverman. London: Sage. 99–112.
34. Mishler, E. G. 1984. The discourse of medicine: dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35. Mishler, E. G. 1986. Research interviewing: context and narrative. London: Harvard University Press.
36. Myers, G. 1998. Displaying opinions: topics and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society 27: 85–111.
37. Pawson, R. 1989. Theorizing the interview. British Journal of Sociology 47, 2: 295–314.
38. Potter, J. and Mulkay, M. 1985. Scientists’ interview talk: interviews as a technique for revealing participants’ interpretative practices. In The research interview: uses and approaches, edited by M. Brenner, J. Brown, and D. Canter. London: Academic Press.
39. Prior, L. 1997. Following Foucault’s footsteps. In Qualitative research: theory, method, and practice, edited by D. Silverman. London: Sage. 63–79.
40. Rapley, M. and Antaki, C. 1998. ‘What do you think about… ?’: generating views in an interview. Text 20: 3, 307–345.
41. Rose, E. (1960) The English record of a natural sociology. American Sociological Review 25 (April): 193–208.
42. Roberts, C. and Sarangi, S. 1999. Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: issues of practical relevance for the researcher. In Talk, work, and institutional order: discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings, edited by S. Sarangi and C. Roberts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 473–503.
43. Sacks, H. 1985. The inference-making machine: notes on observability. In Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 3, edited by T. van Dijk. London: Academic Press.
44. Sarangi, S. 1996. Conflation of institutional and cultural stereotyping in Asian migrants’ discourse. Discourse and Society 7, 3: 359–387.
45. Sarangi, S. 2000. Activity types, talk types, and interactional hybridity. In Language and social life, edited by S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard. London: Pearson. 1–27.
46. Sarangi, S. 2002. Discourse practitioners as a community of interprofessional practice: some insights from health communication research. In Research and practice in professional discourse, edited by C.N. Candlin. Hong Kong: City University Press 95–135.
47. Sarangi, S. and Candlin, C. N. 2001. Motivational relevancies: some methodological reflections on social theoretical and sociolinguistic practice. In Sociolinguistics and social theory, edited by N. Coupland, S. Sarangi, and C.N. Candlin. London: Pearson. 350–388.
48. Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. 1999. The dynamics of interactional and institutional orders in work-related settings. In Talk, work, and institutional order: discourse in medical, mediation, and management settings, edited by S. Sarangi and C. Roberts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–57.
49. Silverman, D. 1973. Interview talk: bringing off a research instrument. Sociology 7, 1: 32–48.
50. Silverman, D. 1993. Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for interpreting talk, text, and interaction. London: Sage.
51. Suchman, L. and Jordan, B. 1990. Interactional troubles in face-to-face survey interviews. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 232–253.
52. van Dijk, T. A. 1984. Prejudice in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
53. Widdicombe, S. and Wooffitt, R. 1995. The language of youth subcultures. Hemel Hampstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
54. Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
55. Wolfson, N. 1976. Speech events and natural speech: some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society 5: 189–209.
56. Zimmerman, D. 1998. Identity, context, and interaction. In Identities in talk, edited by C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe. London: Sage. 87–106.
57. Zimmerman, D. and Pollner, M. 1971. The everyday world as a phenomenon. In Understanding everyday life: toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge, edited by J. D. Douglas. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 80–103.