Integrative studies on rural landscapes: Policy expectations and research practice

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 70, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 177-191

  Tress, Bärbel ^a   Tress, Gunther ^a   Fry, Gary ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinarity; Landscape; Research funding; Research policy; Transdisciplinarity

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

FUNDING AGENCIES; PROJECT LEADERS; RESEARCHERS; RURAL LANDSCAPES;

RURAL AREAS;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; POLICY ANALYSIS; RURAL LANDSCAPE;

EID: 6344256466     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.013     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (76)

1. Antrop, M., 2003. Expectations of scientists towards interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape research. In: Tress, B. Tress, G., van der Valk, A., Fry, G. (Eds.), Potential and Limitations of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies. Delta Series 2, Wageningen, pp. 44-54.
2. van Asselt M.B.A., Rijkens-Klomp N. A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in Integrated Assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environ. Change. 12:2002;167-184
3. Benson J.F. On research, scholarship and design in landscape architecture. Landscape Res. 23(2):1998;198-204
4. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie), 1996. Förderschwerpunkt Ökologische Konzeptionen für Agrarlandschaften, Rahmenkonzept. Bonn.
5. BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung), 2000. Rahmenkonzept Sozial-ökologische Forschung. Bonn.
6. BMWV (Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr), 1998a. Research initiative on cultural (man-made) landscapes. Status report 1998. Wien.
7. BMWV (Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr), 1998b. Umweltwissenschaft im öffentlichen Auftrag. Vom Konzept zur Forschungspraxis. Wien.
8. BMWV (Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr), 1999. Österreichische Forschungsstrategie. Wien. Available: http://www.bmbwk.gv. at/media/4162_fober99.pdf.
9. BMWV-KK (Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft und Verkehr, Koordinationsbüro "Kulturlandschaftsforschung"), 1999. Kulturlandschaftsforschung Bulletin 3, April 1999.
10. Brewer G. Mistra in context. Policy Sci. 32:1999;319-321
11. Buchecker M., Hunziker M., Kienast F. Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Lands. Urban Plan. 64:2003;29-46
12. Burley J., Seppälä R., El-Lakany H., Krott M. Voicing interests and concerns: challenges for forest research. Forest Policy Econ. 2:2001;79-88
13. Cortner H.J. Making science relevant to environmental policy. Environ. Sci. Policy. 3:2000;21-30
14. Daily G.C., Ehrlich P.R. Managing earth's ecosystems: an interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems. 2:1999;277-280
15. Daschkeit, A., Dombrowsky, W.R., Hollaender, K., Reusswig, F., Toussaint, V., Wächter, M., 2001. Interdisziplinarität in den Umweltwissenschaften - Konzeptionen, Organisation, Erfahrungen. In: Fränzle, O., Müller F., Schröder, W. (Eds.), Handbuch der Umweltwissenschaften. 7. Erg.Lfg. Entwicklung und Interdisziplinarität. Ecomed, Landsberg/Lech, pp. 3-24.
16. Décamps H. Demanding more from landscape research (and researchers). Lands. Urban Plan. 57:2000;169-175
17. Engel H. Management of interdisciplinary teams. Water Sci. Tech. 31:1995;41-46
18. European Commission, 2000a. Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a European Research Area. Brussels, 18 January 2000, COM (2000) 6. Available: http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/policies.htm.
19. European Commission, 2000b. Commission Working Document: Science, Society and the Citizen in Europe. Brussels, 14 November 2000, SEC (2000) 1973. Available: http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/policies.htm.
20. European Commission, 2001a. Environment 2010: Our Future, Our Choice. Sixth EU Environment Action Programme 2001-2010, Luxembourg.
21. European Commission, 2001b. Report of the working group: Democratising expertise and establishing scientific reference systems (Group 1b), White Paper on Governance, Work are 1, Broadening and Enriching the Public Debate on European Matters. Brussels, May 2001. Available: http://www.cordis.lu/rtd2002/ science-society/governance.htm.
22. European Commission, 2002a. Science and Society Action Plan. Bruxelles. Available: http://www.cordis.lu/science-society.
23. European Commission, 2002b. Framework Programme 6. Available: http://europe.eu.int/comm/research/fp6.
24. European Commission, 2002c. Provisions for implementing integrated projects. Working document, 3rd edition, 7 May 2002. Available: http://europe.eu.int/comm/research/fp6/networks-ip.html.
25. European Commission, 2002d. Preparing for FP6: Report on the Analysis of Expressions of Interest 2002. Call identifier EOI.FP6.2002, 1.1.7 Citizens and Governance in a knowledge based society, September 2002. Available: ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/fp6/docs/eoi_analysis_117.pdf.
26. European Commission, 2002e. Preparing for FP6: Report on the Analysis of Expressions of Interest 2002. Call identifier EOI.FP6.2002, 1.1.6.3 Global change and Ecosystems, September 2002. Available: ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/fp6/ docs/eoi_analysis_1163.pdf.
27. Ewel K.C. Natural resource management: the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. Ecosystems. 4:2001;716-722
28. Fischhoff B. Scientific management of science? Policy Sci. 33:2000;73-87
29. Forskningsstyrelsen, 2002. Menneske, Landskab og Biodiversitet (1995-2001). August 2002. Available: http//www.forsk.dk/forskpro/menneske/index. htm.
30. Fry G. Multifunctional landscapes: towards transdisciplinary research. Lands. Urban Plan. 57:2001;159-168
31. Fry, G., Sarlöv-Herlin, I., 1995. Landscape design: how do we incorporate ecological, cultural and aesthetic values in landscape assessment and design principles? In: Griffiths, G.H. (Ed.), Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference of IALE (UK), The University of Reading, 19-20th September 1995. Colin Cross Printers Ltd, Garstang, pp. 51-60.
32. Funtowicz S., Shepherd I., Wilkinson D., Ravetz J. Science and governance in the European Union: a contribution to the debate. Sci. Public Policy. 27(5):2000;327-336
33. Geertz, C., 1983. Towards an ethnography of modern thought. In: Geertz, C. (Eds.), Local Knowledge. BASIC Books, New York, pp. 5-15.
34. Giri A.K. Transcending disciplinary boundaries. Creative experiments and the critique of modernity. Critique Anthropol. 18(4):2002;379-404
35. Haaren C.V. Landscape planning facing the challenge of the development of cultural landscapes. Lands. Urban Plan. 60:2002;73-80
36. Höll A., Nilsson K. Cultural landscape as subject to national research programmes in Denmark. Lands. Urban Plan. 46:1999;15-27
37. Hollaender, K., Loibl, M.C., Wilts, A., 2002. Management of trandisciplinary research. In: Hadorn Hirsch, G. (Ed.), Unity of knowledge in transdisciplinary research for sustainability. Encyclopedia of Life Support, http://www.colss.net.
38. Jahn, T., 2002. Konzept und Genese des Förderschwerpunktes "Sozial-ökologische Forschung". In: GSF-Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit GmbH (Ed.), Zukunft gewinnen-Der Beitrag der sozial-ökologischen Forschung. Dokumentation der BMBF-Auftaktkonferenz, Berlin, Mai 2002. München, pp. 17-22.
39. Kinzig A.P. Bridging disciplinary divides to address environmental and intellectual challenges. Ecosystems. 4:2001;709-715
40. Klein, J.T., 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory & Practice. Wayne State University Press, Detroit.
41. Klijn, J., Vos, W., 2000. A new identity for landscape ecology in Europe: a research strategy for the next decade. In: Klijn, J., Vos, W. (Eds.), From Landscape Ecology to Landscape Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 149-161.
42. Michael, D.N., 1995. Barriers and bridges to learning in a turbulent human ecology. In: Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., Light, S.S. (Eds.), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems in Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 461-485.
43. MISTRA, 2002. 2001-annual report. Available: http://www.mistra.org.
44. Moss M. Interdisciplinarity, landscape ecology and the 'transformation of agricultural landscapes'. Lands. Ecol. 15:2000;303-311
45. MRIT (The Ministry of Research and information Technology), 1995. Research in Perspective. White Paper on a National Research Strategy. Copenhagen.
46. Nassauer J.I. Culture and changing landscape structure. Lands. Ecol. 10(4):1995;229-237
47. Naveh Z. Interactions of landscapes and cultures. Lands. Urban Plan. 32:1995;43-54
48. Norges Forskningsråd, 2002: Fler- og tverrfaglighet i miljø og utviklingsforskning. Handlingsplan 2002-2004. Oslo.
49. Norse D., Tschirley J.B. Links between science and policy making. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 82:2000;15-26
50. Opdam P., Foppen R., Vos C. Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Lands. Ecol. 16:2002;767-779
51. Patton, M.Q., 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
52. Peacock M. Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System. 30:2002;479-497
53. Persson G. Mistra's role and some lessons learned in the first five years. Policy Sci. 32:1999;323-326
54. Policansky D. Interdisciplinary problem solving: The National Research Council. Policy Sci. 32:1999;385-391
55. Rinia E.J., Leeuwen Th.N., van Vuren H.G., Raan A.F.J. Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research. Res. Policy. 30:2001;357-361
56. RMNO (Raad voor ruimtelijk milieu- en natuuronderzoek), 2001. Kennis als passie en fascinatie. Meerjarenvisie RMNO. Den Haag.
57. Sabatier P. Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change. Knowledge: Creat. Dif. Util. 8:1987;649-692
58. Scott D.K. General education for an integrative age. Higher Educ. Policy. 15:2002;7-18
59. Shepherd, I., 2000. Science and governance in the European Union: A Contribution to the Debate. 09 March 2000. Available: http://Governance.jrc.it/ scandg-eur.pdf.
60. Siebenhüner B. How do scientific assessments learn? Part 1. Conceptual framework and case study of the IPCC. Envir. Sci. Policy. 5:2002;411-420
61. Slaymaker O. Natural hazards in British Columbia: an interdisciplinary and inter-institutional challenge. Int. J. Earth Sci. 88:1999;317-324
62. Spanner D. Border crossings: understanding the cultural and informational dilemmas of interdisciplinary scholars. J. Am. Librarianship. 27(5):2001;352-360
63. Tait, J., Lyall, C., 2001. Final Report Short Term Investigation into ESRC Funded Interdisciplinary Research. May 2001. Available: http://www.rcss.ed.ac.uk/supra/escrid.pdf.
64. Thwaites K. Landscape design is research: an exploration. Lands. Res. 23(2):1998;196-198
65. Tress B., Tress G. Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Lands. Urban Plan. 57:2001;143-157
66. Tress B., Tress G., Décamps H., d'Hauteserre A.-M. Bridging human and natural sciences in landscape research. Lands. Urban Plan. 57:2001;137-141
67. Tress, B., Tress, G., 2002. Disciplinary and meta-disciplinary approaches in landscape ecology. In: Bastian, O., Steinhardt, U. (Eds.), Development and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 362-373.
68. Tress, B., Tress, G., van der Valk, A., Fry, G. (Eds.), 2003. Potential and Limitations of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies. Delta Series 2, Wageningen.
69. Turner M.G., Carpenter S.R. Tips and traps in interdisciplinary research. Ecosystems. 2:1999;275-276
70. Turner R.K. Integrating natural and socio-economic science in coastal management. J. Marine Syst. 25:2000;447-460
71. Uhrwing, M., 2003. MISTRA and interdisciplinarity-experiences and expectations. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., van der Valk, A., Fry, G. (Eds.), Potential and Limitations of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies. Delta Series 2, Wageningen, pp. 28-32.
72. Wächter, M., 2003. The program "Social-Ecological Research" of the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF), Germany. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., van der Valk, A., Fry, G. (Eds.), Potential and Limitations of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies. Delta Series 2, Wageningen, pp. 19-27.
73. Weingart, P., Stehr, N. (Eds.), 2000. Practicing Interdisciplinarity. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
74. Wijkman A. Sustainable development requires integrated approaches. Policy Sci. 32:1999;345-350
75. Winder, N., 2003. Successes and problems when conducting interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary (=integrative) research. In: Tress, B., Tress, G., van der Valk, A., Fry, G. (Eds.), Potential and Limitations of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies. Delta Series 2, Wageningen, pp. 74-90.
76. Wu J., Hobbs R. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Lands. Ecol. 17:2002;355-365