Detoxification of a lignocellulosic biomass slurry by soluble polyelectrolyte adsorption for improved fermentation efficiency

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 108, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2053-2060

  Carter, Brian ^a   Squillace, Phillip ^a   Gilcrease, Patrick C ^a   Menkhaus, Todd J ^a  

^a South Dakota School of Mines and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Biomass; Fermentation; Inhibitory compounds; Polyelectrolyte; Separations

Indexed keywords

5 HYDROXYMETHYL FURFURALS; DILUTE ACIDS; ETHANOL YIELD; FERMENTABILITY; FERMENTATION EFFICIENCY; GLUCOSE LEVEL; INHIBITORY COMPOUNDS; LIGNOCELLULOSIC BIOMASS; OPTIMAL PROCESS; POLYELECTROLYTE ADSORPTION; POLYETHYLENEIMINE; PONDEROSA PINES; SOLID PARTICLES;

ACETIC ACID; ADSORPTION; ALDEHYDES; CATALYSTS; DETOXIFICATION; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FURFURAL; GLUCOSE; INVESTMENTS; PH; POLYELECTROLYTES; YEAST;

ENZYMATIC HYDROLYSIS;

5 HYDROXYMETHYLFURFURAL; ACETIC ACID; ACID; ALCOHOL; CELLULASE; FURFURAL; GLUCOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; POLYELECTROLYTE; POLYETHYLENEIMINE; POLYMER; XYLOSE;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOMASS FERMENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DETOXIFICATION; HYDROLYSIS; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PINE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SOLID; WOOD;

BIOFUELS; BIOMASS; FERMENTATION; FLOCCULATION; HYDROLYSIS; LIGNIN; PINUS; POLYETHYLENEIMINE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 79960455457     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.23152     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alriksson B, Sjöde A, Nilvebrant N, Jönsson L. 2006. Optimal conditions for alkaline detoxification of dilute-acid lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 130(1): 599-611.
2. Bothast R, Nichols N, Dien B. 1999. Fermentations with new recombinant organisms. Biotechnol Prog 15(5): 867-875.
3. Burke D, Anderson J, Gilcrease P, Menkhaus T. 2011. Enhanced solid-liquid clarification of biomass slurries using polyelectrolyte flocculating agents. Biomass Bioenergy 35(1): 391-401.
4. Carter B, Gilcrease PC, Menkhaus TJ. 2010. Removal and recovery of furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and acetic acid from aqueous solutions using a soluble polyelectrolyte. Biotechnol Bioeng (in press), DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.053.
5. Helfferich F. 1962. Ion exchange. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. Horváth I, Sjöde A, Alriksson B, Jönsson L, Nilvebrant N. 2005. Critical conditions for improved fermentability during overliming of acid hydrolysates from spruce. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121-124: 1031-1044.
7. Jerabek K, Hankova L, Prokop Z. 1994. Post-crosslinked polymer adsorbents and their properties for separation of furfural from aqueous solutions. Reactive Polymers 23(2-3): 107-112.
8. Klinke H, Thomsen A, Ahring B. 2004. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66(1): 10-26.
9. Larsson S, Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Tengborg C, Stenberg K, Zacchi G, Nilvebrant N. 1999a. The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microb Technol 24(3-4): 151-159.
10. Larsson S, Reimann A, Nilvebrant N, Jönsson L. 1999b. Comparison of different methods for the detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolyzates of spruce. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 77(1): 91-103.
11. Liu Z, Slininger P, Dien B, Berhow M, Kurtzman C, Gorsich S. 2004. Adaptive response of yeasts to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and new chemical evidence for HMF conversion to 2, 5-bis-hydroxymethylfuran. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 31(8): 345-352.
12. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee Y, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M. 2005. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96(6): 673-686.
13. Mussatto S, Roberto I. 2004. Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes: A review. Bioresour Technol 93(1): 1-10.
14. Nakagame S, Chandra R, Saddler J. 2010. The effect of isolated lignins, obtained from a range of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates, on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 105(5): 871-879.
15. Narkis N, Rebhun M. 1977. Stoichiometric relationship between humic and fulvic acids and flocculants. J Am Water Works Assoc 69(6): 325-328.
16. Nilvebrant N, Reimann A, Larsson S, Jönsson L. 2001. Detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates with ion-exchange resins. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 91(1): 35-49.
17. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. 2000. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: Inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol 74(1): 25-33.
18. Rozman H, Tay G, Kumar R, Abubakar A, Ismail H, Ishak Z. 1999. Polypropylene hybrid composites: A preliminary study on the use of glass and coconut fiber as reinforcements in polypropylene composites. Polym Plast Technol Eng 38(5): 997-1011.
19. Talens-Alesson F, Anthony S, Bryce M. 2006. Removal of phenol by adsorptive micellar flocculation: Multi-stage separation and integration of wastes for pollution minimisation. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 276(1-3): 8-14.
20. Tengborg C, Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2001. Reduced inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Enzyme Microb Technol 28(9-10): 835-844.
21. Villa G, Bartroli R, Lopez R, Guerra M, Enrique M, Penas M, Rodriquez E, Redondo D, Jglesias I, Diaz M. 1992. Microbial transformation of furfural to furfuryl alcohol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Acta Biotechnologica 12(6): 509-512.
22. Zhu J-J, Yong Q, Xu Y, Yu S-Y. 2009. Comparative detoxification of vacuum evaporation/steam stripping combined with overliming on corn stover prehydrolysate. International Conference on Energy and Environment Technology: Guilin, China, p. 240-243.