Event-based and emergent timing: Dichotomy or continuum? a reply to repp and steinman (2010)

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 311-318

  Delignieres, Didier ^a   Torre, Kjerstin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

emergent timing; event based timing; windowed autocorrelation

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOTE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME PERCEPTION;

ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 79960794063     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: 19401027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222895.2011.588274     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Balasubramaniam, R., Wing, A. M., & Daffertshofer, A. (2004). Keepingwith the beat:Movement trajectories contribute tomovement timing. Experimental Brain Research, 159, 129-134. (Pubitemid 39517820)
2. Delignières, D., Lemoine, L., & Torre, K. (2004) Time intervals production in tapping and oscillatory motion. Human Movement Science, 23, 87-103. (Pubitemid 39341868)
3. Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & Smith, A. (1992). Evidence of common timing processes in the control ofmanual, orofacial, and speech movements. Journal of Motor behavior, 24, 281-287.
4. Gilden, D. L., Thornton, T., & Mallon, M. W. (1995). 1/f noise in human cognition. Science, 267, 1837-1839.
5. Huys, R., Studenka, B. E., Rheaume, N. R., Zelaznik, H. N., & Jirsa, V. K. (2008). Distinct timing mechanisms produce discrete and continuous movements. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(4), e1000061.
6. Ivry, R. B., & Hazeltine, R. E. (1995). Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: Evidence for a common timing mechanism. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 3-18.
7. Keele, S. W., & Ivry, R. B. (1987). Modular analysis of timing in motor skill. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 128-228). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Keele, S. W., Pokorny, R. A., Corcos, D. M., & Ivry, R. (1985). Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms: A correlational analysis. Acta Psychologica, 60, 173-191.
9. Lemoine, L. (2007). Implication of event-based and emergent processes in the timing control of movements. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University Montpellier I, France.
10. Lemoine, L., & Delignières, D. (2009). Detrended windowed (lag one) auto-correlation: A new method for distinguishing between event-based and emergent timing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 585-604.
11. Lemoine, L., Torre, K., & Delignières, D. (2006). Testing for the presence of 1/f noise in continuation tapping data. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 247-257.
12. Madison, G., & Delignières, D. (2009). Auditory feedback affects the long-range correlation of isochronous serial interval production: Support for a closed-loop or memory model of timing. Experimental Brain Research, 193, 519-527.
13. Repp, B. H. (2008). Perfect phase correction in synchronization with slow auditory sequences. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40, 363-367.
14. Repp, B. H., & Steinman, S. R. (2010). Simultaneous event-based and emergent timing: Synchronization, continuation, and phase correction. Journal of Motor Behavior, 42, 111-126.
15. Robertson, S. D., Zelaznik, H. N., Lantero, D. A., Bojczyk, G., Spencer, R.M., Doffin, J. G., & Schneidt, T. (1999). Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: Evidence against a single timing process for motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1316-1330.
16. Schöner, G. (2002). Timing, clocks, and dynamical systems. Brain and Cognition, 48, 31-51. (Pubitemid 34095191)
17. Spencer, R. M. C., & Ivry, R. B. (2005). Comparison of patients with Parkinson's disease or cerebellar lesions in the production of periodic movements involving event-based or emergent timing. Brain and Cognition, 58, 84-93. (Pubitemid 40692881)
18. Spencer, R. M. C., Ivry, R. B., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2003). Role of the cerebellum in movement: control of timing or movement transitions? Experimental Brain Research, 161, 383-396.
19. Spencer, R. M. C., Zelaznik, H. N., Diedrichsen, J., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science, 300, 1437-1439. (Pubitemid 36638164)
20. Studenka, B. E., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2008). The influence of dominant versus non-dominant hand on event and emergent motor timing. Human Movement Science, 27, 29-52.
21. Torre, K., & Balasubramaniam, R. (2009). Two different processes for sensorimotor synchronization in continuous and discontinuous rhythmic movements. Experimental Brain Research, 1999, 157-166.
22. Torre, K., Balasubramaniam, R., & Delignières, D. (2010). Oscillating in synchrony with a metronome: Analysis of serial dependence and limit cycle dynamics. Motor Control, 14, 323-343.
23. Torre,K.,&Delignières,D. 2008a). Distinctways for timingmovements in bimanual coordination tasks: The contribution of serial correlation analysis and implications for modelling. Acta Psychologica, 129, 284-296.
24. β noise in self-paced and synchronized tapping: A unifying mechanistic model. Biological Cybernetics, 99, 159-170.
25. Wing, A. L., & Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). The timing of interresponse intervals. Perception and Psychophysics, 13, 455-460.
26. Zelaznik, H. N., Spencer, R. M., & Doffin, J. G. (2000). Temporal precision in tapping and circle drawing movements at preferred rates is not correlated: Further evidence against timing as a general-purpose ability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 193-199. (Pubitemid 30366494)
27. Zelaznik, H. N., Spencer, R. M., & Ivry, R. B. (2002). Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 575-588.