Detrended windowed (lag one) autocorrelation: A new method for distinguishing between event-based and emergent timing

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 585-604

  Lemoine, Loïc ^a   Delignières, Didier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

Autocorrelation; Emergent; Event based; Spectral analysis; Timers

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SPECTROSCOPY; STATISTICS; TIME; TIME PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS; TIME PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65349100537     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210802131896     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cannon, M. J., Percival, D. B., Caccia, D, C., Raymond, G. M., & Bassingthwaighte, J. B. (1997). Evaluated scaled windowed variance methods for estimating the Hurst coefficient of time series. Physica A, 241, 606-626.
2. Collier, G. L., & Ogden, R. T. (2004). Adding drift to the decomposition of simple isochronous tapping: An extension of the Wing - Kristofferson model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 853-872.
3. Davies, R. B., & Harte, D. S. (1987). Tests for Hurst effect. Biometrika, 74, 95-101.
4. Delignières, D., Lemoine, L., &Torre, K. (2004). Time intervals production in tapping and oscillatory motion. Human Movement Science, 23, 87-103.
5. Delignières, D., Ramdani, S., Lemoine, L., Torre, K, Fortes, M., & Ninot, G. (2006). Fractal analyses for "short" time series: A re-assessment of classical methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50, 525-544.
6. Delignières, D., Torre, K., & Lemoine, L. (2005). Methodological issues in the application of monofractal analyses in psychological and behavioral research. Nonlinear Dynamics in Psychology and Life Science, 9, 435-461.
7. Delignières, D., Torre, K., & Lemoine, L. (2008). Fractal models for event-based and dynamical timers. Acta Psychohgica, 127, 382-397.
8. Deriche, M., &Tewfik, A. H. (1993). Maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of discrete fractionally differenced Gaussian noise process. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 41, 2977-2989.
9. Eke, A., Herman, P., Bassingthwaighte, J. B, Raymond, G. M., Percival, D. B, Cannon, M., et al. (2000). Physiological time series: Distinguishing fractal noises from motions. Pflugers Archiv, 439, 403-415.
10. Fougère, P. F. (1985). On the accuracy of spectrum analysis of red noise processes using maximum entropy and periodogram methods: Simulation studies and application to geographical data. Journal of Geographical Research, 90, 4355-4366.
11. Gilden, D. L., Thornton, T., &Malion, M. W. (1995). 1/f noise in human cognition. Science, 267, 1837-1839.
12. Ivry, R. B., & Corcos, D. M. (1993). Slicing the variability pie: Component analysis of coordination and motor dysfunction. In K. M. Newell & D. M. Corcos (Eds.), Variability and motor control (pp. 415-447). Urbana, IL: Human Kinetics.
13. Ivry, R. B., & Hazeltine, R. E. (1995). Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: Evidence for a common timing mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 3-18.
14. Keele, S. W., Ivry, R. I., & Pokorny, R. (1987). Force control and its relation to timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 96-114.
15. Keele, S. W., Pokorny, R. A., Corcos, D. M., & Ivry, R. (1985). Do perception and motor production share common timing mechanisms; A correctional analysis. Acta Psychologica (Atnst), 60, 173-191.
16. Lemoine, L., Torre, K., & Delignières, D. (2006). Testing for the presence of 1/f noise in continuation tapping data. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 247-257.
17. Madison, G. (2004). Fractal modeling of human isochronous serial interval production. Biological Cybernetics, 90, 105-112.
18. McAuley, J. D., Jones, M. R., Holub, S., Johnston, H. M, & Miller, N. S. (2006). The time of our lives; Life span development of timing and event tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 348-367.
19. Ogden, R. T., & Collier, G. L. (1999). On detecting and modeling deterministic drift in long run sequences of tapping data. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 28, 977-987.
20. Pressing, J., &Joliey-Rogers, G. (1997). Spectral properties of human cognition and skill. Biological Cybernetics, 76, 339-347.
21. Rangarajan, G., & Ding, M. (2000). Integrated approach to the assessment of long range correlation in time series data. Physical Review E, 61, 4991-5001.
22. Robertson, S. D., Zelaznik, H. N., Lantero, D. A., Bojczyk, K. G., Spencer, R. M., Doffin, J. G., et al. (1999). Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: Evidence against a single timing process for motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1316-1330.
23. Schömer, G. (2002). Timing, clocks, and dynamical systems. Brain and Cognition, 48, 31-51.
24. Vorberg, D., & Wing, A. (1996). Modeling variability and dependence in timing. In H. Heuer & S. W. Keele (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action (Vol. 2, pp. 181-262). London: Academic Press.
25. Wing, A. M., & Kristofferson, A. B. (1973a). Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 5-12.
26. Wing, A. M., & Kristofferson, A. B. (1973b). The timing of interresponse intervals. Perception and Psychophysics, 13, 455-460.
27. Zelaznik, H. N., Spencer, R. M., &Ivry, R. B. (2002). Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 575-588.