How Jurors Use and Misuse Character Evidence

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 347-361

  Hunt, Jennifer S ^a   Budesheim, Thomas Lee ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHARACTER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

CHARACTER; CRIME; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1842659040     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.347     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Baron, R. A., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1988). Degree of detail of eyewitness testimony and mock juror judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1171-1192.
3. Bell, B. E., & Loftus, E. F. (1989). Trivial persuasion in the courtroom: The power of (a few) minor details. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 669-679.
4. Borgida, E. (1979). Character proof and the fireside induction. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 189-202.
5. Borgida, E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1977). The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 258-271.
6. Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children's credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 702-732.
7. Bryden, D. P., & Park, R. C. (1994). "Other crimes" evidence in sex offense cases. Minnesota Law Review, 78, 529-583.
8. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
9. Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.
10. Davies, S. M. (1991). Evidence of character to prove conduct: A reassessment of relevancy. Criminal Law Bulletin, 27, 504-537.
11. Freund, T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Shpitzajzen, A. (1985). The freezing and unfreezing of impressional primacy: Effects of need for structure and the fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 479-487.
12. Ginossar, Z., & Trope, Y. (1980). The effects of base rates and individuating information on judgments about another person. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 228-242.
13. Greene, E., & Dodge, M. (1995). The influence of prior record evidence on juror decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 67-78.
14. Hamill, R., Wilson, T. D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1980). Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 578-589.
15. Hamilton, D. L., & Zanna, M. P. (1972). Differential weighting of favorable and unfavorable attributes in impressions of personality. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 204-212.
16. Harmon, R. R., & Coney, K. A. (1982). The persuasive effects of source credibility in buy and lease situations. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 255-260.
17. Kaplan, M. F. (1985). Character testimony. In S. Kassin & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), The psychology of evidence and trial procedure (pp. 150-174). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18. Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
19. Kuhns, R. B. (1981). The propensity to misunderstand the character of specific acts evidence. Iowa Law Review, 66, 777-810.
20. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
21. Leonard, D. P. (1986-1987). The use of character to prove conduct: Rationality and catharsis in the law of evidence. University of Colorado Law Review, 58, 1-61.
22. Leonard, D. P. (1998). In defense of the character evidence prohibition: The rule against trial by character. Indiana Law Journal, 73, 1161-1215.
23. Lieberman, J. D., & Arndt, J. (2000). Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures of instructions to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 677-711.
24. London, K., & Nunez, N. (2000). The effect of jury deliberations on jurors' propensity to disregard inadmissible evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 932-939.
25. Lupfer, M., Cohen, R., Bernard, J. L., & Smalley, D. (1986). Presenting favorable and unfavorable character evidence to juries. Law and Psychology Review, 10, 59-71.
26. Lupfer, M. B., Weeks, M., & Dupuis, S. (2000). How pervasive is the negativity bias in judgments based on character appraisal? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1353-1366.
27. Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants of victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315-1344
28. McElhaney, J. W. (1993). Understanding character evidence: Four ideas that de it all together. ABA Journal, 79, 76-77.
29. Melilli, K. J. (1998). The character evidence rule revisited. Brigham Young University Law Review, 1547-1627.
30. Mendez, M. A. (1984). California's new law on character evidence: Evidence code section 352 and the impact of recent psychological studies. UCLA Law Review, 31, 1003-1060.
31. Mendez, M. A. (1996). The law of evidence and the search for a stable personality. Emory Law Journal, 45, 221-238.
32. Michelson v. United States, 335 U. S. 469 (U. S. Ct. App. 2nd Cir. 1948).
33. Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, J. K. (1982). Factors affecting assessment of witness credibility. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.), The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 169-194). New York: Academic Press.
34. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
35. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
36. Park, R. C. (1998). Character at the crossroads. Hastings Law Journal, 49, 717-779.
37. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242-258.
38. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189-206.
39. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
40. Reeder, G. D., & Coovert, M. D. (1986). Revising an impression of morality. Social Cognition, 4, 1-17.
41. Reyes, R. M., Thompson, W. C., & Bower, G. H. (1980). Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 2-12.
42. Saltzburg, S. A., Martin, M. M., & Capra, D. J. (1998). Federal Rules of Evidence manual (7th ed., Vol. 1). Charlottesville, VA: LEXIS Law Publishing.
43. Schwarz, N., Strack, F., Hilton, D., & Naderer, G. (1991). Base rates, representativeness, and the logic of conversation: The contextual relevance of "irrelevant" information. Social Cognition, 9, 67-84.
44. Sheft, M. A. (1995). Federal Rule of Evidence 413: A dangerous new frontier. American Criminal Law Review, 33, 57-87.
45. Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J. C. (1994). Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: Incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 674-687.
46. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689-699.
47. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
48. Sommers, S. R., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2001). White juror bias: An investigation of prejudice against Black defendants in the American courtroom. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 201-229.
49. Tanford, S., & Cox, M. (1988). The effects of impeachment evidence and limiting instructions on individual and group decision making, Law and Human Behavior, 12, 477-497.
50. Taylor, S. E., & Thompson, S. C. (1982). Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. Psychological Review, 89, 155-181.
51. Tillers, P. (1998). What is wrong with character evidence? Hastings Law Journal, 49, 781-834.
52. Uviller, H. R. (1982). Evidence of character to prove conduct: Illusion, illogic, and injustice in the courtroom. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 130, 845-891.
53. Uviller, H. R. (1993). Credence, character, and the Rules of Evidence: Seeing through the liar's tale. Duke Law Journal, 42, 776-839.
54. Wissler, R. L., & Saks, M. J. (1985). On the inefficacy of limiting instructions: When jurors use prior conviction evidence to decide on guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 1985.
55. Wydick, R. C. (1987). Character evidence: A guided tour of the grotesque structure. University of California, Davis Law Review, 21, 123-195.
56. Wyer, R. S., Budesheim, T. L., & Lambert, A. J. (1990). Person memory and judgment: The cognitive representation of informal conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 218-235.
57. Wyer, R. S., Budesheim, T. L., Lambert, A. J., & Swan, S. (1994). Person memory and judgment: Pragmatic influences on impressions formed in a social context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 254-267.
58. Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.