Trends in water monomer adsorption and dissociation on flat insulating surfaces

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Volumn 13, Issue 27, 2011, Pages 12447-12453

  Hu, Xiao Liang ^a   Carrasco, Javier ^a,b   Klimeš, Jiří ^a   Michaelides, Angelos ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b FRITZ HABER INSTITUT DER MAX PLANCK GESELLSCHAFT   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960768745     PISSN: 14639076     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c1cp20846b     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. A. Hodgson, S. Haq Surf. Sci. Rep., 2009, 64, 381.
2. G. E. Brown Jr., V. E. Henrich, W. H. Casey, D. L. Clark, C. Eggleston, A. Felmy, D. W. Goodman, M. Grätzel, G. Maciel, M. I. McCarthy, K. H. Nealson, D. A. Sverjensky, M. F. Toney, J. M. Zachara Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 77.
3. M. A. Henderson Surf. Sci. Rep., 2002, 46, 1.
4. P. Fenter, N. C. Sturchio Prog. Surf. Sci., 2004, 77, 171.
5. A. Verdaguer, G. M. Sacha, H. Bluhm, M. Salmeron Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 1478.
6. G. E. Ewing Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 1511.
7. M. W. Kanan, D. G. Nocera Science, 2008, 321, 1072.
8. M. W. Kanan, Y. Surendranath, D. G. Nocera Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 109.
9. D. Wolf, M. Barré-Chassonnery, M. Höhenberger, A. van Veen, M. Baerns Catal. Today, 1998, 40, 174.
10. Q. Fu, H. Saltsburg, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos Science, 2003, 301, 935.
11. N. Kumar, P. R. C. Kent, A. V. Bandura, J. D. Kubicki, D. J. Wesolowski, D. R. Cole, J. O. Sofo J. Chem. Phys., 2011, 134, 044706.
12. K. D. Kreuer Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 2003, 33, 333.
13. J. K. Nørskov, T. Bligaard, J. Rossmeisl, C. H. Christensen Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 37.
14. J. K. Nørskov, T. Bligaard, B. Hvolbæk, F. Abild-Pedersen, I. Chorkendorff, C. H. Christensen Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 2163.
15. A. Michaelides, Z.-P. Liu, C. J. Zhang, A. Alavi, D. A. King, P. Hu J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 3704.
16. A. Michaelides Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process., 2006, 85, 415.
17. A. Michaelides, A. Alavi, D. A. King J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 2746.
18. K. Andersson, G. Ketteler, H. Bluhm, S. Yamamoto, H. Ogasawara, L. Pettersson, M. Salmeron, A. Nilsson J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 2793.
19. X. L. Hu, J. Klimeš, A. Michaelides Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 3953.
20. L. Giordano, J. Goniakowski, J. Suzanne Phys. Rev. Lett., 1998, 81, 1271.
21. L. Giordano, J. Goniakowski, J. Suzanne Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2000, 62, 15406.
22. L. Delle Site, A. Alavi, R. M. Lynden-Bell J. Chem. Phys., 2000, 113, 3344.
23. R. M. Lynden-Bell, L. D. Site, A. Alavi Surf. Sci., 2002, 496, L1.
24. C. Zhang, P. J. D. Lindan J. Chem. Phys., 2003, 118, 4620.
25. P. J. D. Lindan, C. Zhang Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2005, 72, 075439.
26. P. M. Kowalski, B. Meyer, D. Marx Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2009, 79, 115410.
27. L.-M. Liu, C. Zhang, G. Thornton, A. Michaelides Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2010, 82, 161415. (R)
28. J. Cheng, M. Sprik Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2010, 82, 081406. (R)
29. O. Bikondoa, C. L. Pang, R. Ithnin, C. A. Muryn, H. Onishi, G. Thornton Nat. Mater., 2006, 5, 189.
30. L. Liu, M. Krack, A. Michaelides J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 8572.
31. L. Liu, M. Krack, A. Michaelides J. Chem. Phys., 2009, 130, 234702.
32. Y. Yang, S. Meng, L. F. Xu, E. G. Wang, S. Gao Phys. Rev. E: Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys., 2005, 72, 012602.
33. Y. Yang, S. Meng, E. G. Wang Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2006, 74, 245409.
34. Y. Yang, S. Meng, E. G. Wang J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2006, 18, 10165.
35. V. E. Henrich, and P. A. Cox, The Surface Science of Metal Oxides, Cambridge University Press, 1994
36. C. Noguera, Physics and Chemistry at Oxide Surfaces, Cambridge University Press, 1996
37. J. Goniakowski, C. Noguera Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2009, 79, 155433.
38. A. Borodin, O. Höfft, U. Kahnert, V. Kempter, A. Poddey, P. E. Blöchl J. Chem. Phys., 2004, 121, 9671.
39. G. Kresse, J. Hafner Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 1993, 47, 558.
40. G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 1996, 54, 11169.
41. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865.
42. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, 78, 1396.
43. P. E. Blöchl Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 1994, 50, 17953.
44. G. Kresse, D. Joubert Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 1999, 59, 1758.
45. The particular PAW potentials used in our calculations include the following number of valence electrons in the potentials: 8 (Mg), 10 (Ca), 10 (Sr), 10 (Ba), 6 (O), 6 (S), 7 (F), 7 (Cl), 3 (Li), 7 (Na), 9 (K), 9 (Rb), and 9 (Cs)
46. For example, the adsorption energy in the most stable adsorption structure is -0.48 (-0.48), -0.90 (-0.91), -1.26 (-1.27), -1.49 (-1.48) eV with three (eight) layer slabs on MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO, respectively
47. H. J. Monkhorst, J. D. Pack Phys. Rev. B: Solid State, 1976, 13, 5188.
48. J. Neugebauer, M. Scheffler Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter, 1992, 46, 16067.
49. 0 are 4.25 (4.21) Å for MgO, 4.84 (4.81) Å for CaO, 5.20 (5.16) Å for SrO, 5.61 (5.52) Å for BaO, 5.23 (5.20) Å for MgS, 5.72 (5.69) Å for CaS, 6.06 (6.02) Å for SrS, 6.46 (6.39) Å for BaS, 4.08 (4.02) Å for LiF, 4.70 (4.62) Å for NaF, 5.42 (5.35) Å for KF, 5.74 (5.64) Å for RbF, 6.12 (6.01) Å for CsF, 5.16 (5.13) Å for LiCl, 5.70 (5.64) Å for NaCl, 6.39 (6.29) Å for KCl, and 6.71 (6.58) Å for RbCl, respectively. Experimental values are taken from N. W. Ashcroft, and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics, Thomson Learning, USA, 1976
50. J. Carrasco, F. Illas, N. Lopez Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008, 100, 016101.
51. P. Broqvist, H. Grönbeck, I. Panas Surf. Sci., 2004, 554, 262.
52. N. V. Skorodumova, K. Hermansson, B. Johansson Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2005, 72, 125414.
53. M. Dion, H. Rydberg, E. Schröder, D. C. Langreth, B. I. Lundqvist Phys. Rev. Lett., 2004, 92, 246401.
54. The difference between the original vdW-DFT of Dion et al. and optB88-vdW is simply in the choice of exchange functionals, with the optB88 exchange functional yielding more accurate interaction energies than the original choice of revPBE. More details can be found in J. Klimeš, D. R. Bowler, A. Michaelides J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2010, 22, 022201.
55. J. Klimeš, D. R. Bowler, A. Michaelides J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2011, 83, 195131.
56. The adsorption structures considered include ones with the oxygen of the (intact and dissociated) water located on the surface cation and anion sites as well as ones with (intact and dissociated) water bridging between these sites. At each site a variety of orientations for the molecule was examined
57. N. H. de Leeuw, J. A. Purton Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 2001, 63, 195417.
58. B. Li, A. Michaelides, M. Scheffler Surf. Sci., 2008, 602, L135.
59. J. Carrasco, B. Santra, J. Klimeš, A. Michaelides Phys. Rev. Lett., 2011, 106, 026101.
60. The Type III structure in Fig. 1 is another adsorption structure that involves hydrogen bonding with the surface. The same trends and conclusions can be drawn from the Type II and Type III structures in our calculations
61. X. L. Hu, First principles studies of water and ice on oxide surfaces, PhD thesis, UCL, 2010, Available at www.chem.ucl.ac.uk/ice
62. Decompositions of the adsorption energies have been performed on all surfaces. For clarity in Fig. 4, the results of the fluoride and chloride series are not shown
63. In agreement with previous DFT studies,47,48 on the clean MgO(001) surface the metal ions sit inside the oxygen ions, with a negative value of the rumpling Δd. On CaO(001) the rumpling is almost zero and on SrO(001) and BaO(001) a positive rumpling is obtained, with the metal ions outside the oxygens
64. M. Mavrikakis, B. Hammer, J. K. Nørskov Phys. Rev. Lett., 1998, 81, 2819.
65. M. Gsell, P. Jakob, D. Menzel Science, 1998, 280, 717.