Generation of isolated attosecond extreme ultraviolet pulses employing nanoplasmonic field enhancement: Optimization of coupled ellipsoids

New Journal of Physics

Volumn 13, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Stebbings, S L ^a   Sussmann F ^a   Yang, Y Y ^a,b,c   Scrinzi, A ^d   Durach, M ^e   Rusina, A ^e   Stockman, M I ^e   Kling, M F ^a,f,g  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR QUANTENOPTIK   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTOSECONDS; CARRIER-ENVELOPE PHASIS; DINGER EQUATION; ELLIPSOIDAL NANOPARTICLES; EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET PULSE; EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET RADIATIONS; FIELD ENHANCEMENT; FIELD OSCILLATIONS; GOLD NANOSTRUCTURES; HIGH HARMONIC GENERATION; LASER FIELDS; NUMERICAL CALCULATION; OPTIMAL CONDITIONS; OSCILLATORY BEHAVIORS; PLASMONIC; REPETITION RATE; TIME-DEPENDENT; XUV PULSE;

FORECASTING; NANOSTRUCTURES; OPTIMIZATION; PLASMONS;

PULSE REPETITION RATE;

EID: 79960750200     PISSN: 13672630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/13/7/073010     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Krausz F and Ivanov M 2009 Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 163
2. Dombi P et al 2010 Opt. Express 18 24206
3. Stockman M I, Kling M F, Kleineberg U and Krausz F 2007 Nat. Photonics 1 539
4. Stockman M 2008 New J. Phys. 10 025031
5. Kim S et al 2008 Nature 435 757
6. Vasa P, Ropers C, Pomraenke R and Lienau C 2009 Laser Photonics Rev. 3 483
7. Schenk M, Krüger M and Hommelhoff P 2010 Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 257601
8. Zherebtsov S et al 2011 Nat. Phys. at press (doi:10.1038/nphys1983)
9. Sandberg R L et al 2008 Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105 24
10. Drescher M et al 2002 Nature 419 803
11. Uiberacker M et al 2007 Nature 446 627
12. Schultze M et al 2010 Science 328 1658
13. Goulielmakis E et al 2010 Nature 466 739
14. Sansone G et al 2010 Nature 465 763
15. Cavalieri A et al 2007 Nature 449 1029
16. Corkum P 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 1994
17. Lewenstein M et al 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 2117
18. Baltuska A et al 2003 Nature 421 611
19. Kling M F and Vrakking M J J 2008 Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 59 463
20. Goulielmakis E et al 2008 Science 320 1614
21. Jana N R, Gearheart L and Murphy C J 2001 J. Phys. Chem. B 105 4065
22. Penninkhof J J et al 2005 Adv. Mater. 17 1484
23. Plech A, Kotaidis V, Lorenc M and Boneberg J 2005 Nat. Phys. 2 44
24. Stockman M I and Hewageegana P 2007 Appl. Phys. A 89 247
25. Bauer M et al 2007 Appl. Phys. A 88 473
26. Taflove A and Hagness S C 2005 Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method (Boston: Artech House)
27. Schafer K J, Tang B, DiMauro L F and Kulander K C 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1599
28. C F Bohren and D R Huffman 1983 Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles (New York:Wiley)
29. Bergman D J and Stroud D 1992 Physical Properties of Macroscopically Inhomogenous Media (Solid State Physics vol 46) ed H Ehrenreich and D Turnbull (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 147
30. Stockman M I, Faleev S V and Bergman D J 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 167401
31. Bergman D J and Stockman M I 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 027402
32. Stockman M I 2006 Electromagnetic Theory of SERS (Topics in Applied Physics vol 103) ed K Kneipp, M Moskovits and H Kneipp (Berlin: Springer) pp 47
33. Gai H, Wang J and Tian Q 2007 Appl. Opt. 46 2229
34. Berenger J P 1994 J. Comput. Phys. 114 185
35. Yakovlev V S et al 2003 Appl. Phys. B 76 329
36. Johnson P B and Christy R W 1972 Phys Rev. B 6 4370
37. Azipura J, Bryant G W, Richter L J and de Abajo F G 2005 Phys. Rev. B 71 235420
38. Fedotov V A et al 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 147401
39. Yang Y Y et al 2011 Opt. Commun. 284 3474
40. Hommelhoff P et al 2009 Ultramicroscopy 109 423