Robust fault diagnosis in catalytic cracking converter using artificial neural networks

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 16, Issue , 2005, Pages 197-202

  Patan, Krzysztof ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZIELONA GÓRA   (Poland)

Author keywords

Fault diagnosis; Identification; Modelling errors; Neural network; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CATALYTIC CONVERTERS; CATALYTIC CRACKING; FAILURE ANALYSIS; FAULT DETECTION; FAULT TOLERANT COMPUTER SYSTEMS; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); NEURAL NETWORKS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

MODEL ERRORS; MODELLING ERROR; NOMINAL OPERATIONS; ROBUST FAULT DIAGNOSIS; UNCERTAINTY; UNCERTAINTY SOURCES; UNMODELLED DYNAMICS;

RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS;

EID: 79960719854     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3182/20050703-6-cz-1902.01835     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Ayoubi, M. (1994). Fault diagnosis with dynamic neural structure and application to a turbocharger. In: Proc. Int. Symp. Fault Detection Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes, SAFEPROCESS'94, Espoo, Finland. Vol. 2. pp. 618-623.
2. Calado, J. M. F., J. Korbicz, K. Patan, R. J. Patton and J. M. G. Sa da Costa (2001). Soft computing approaches to fault diagnosis for dynamic systems. European Journal of Control 7(2-3), 248-286.
3. Chen, J. and R. J. Patton (1999). Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Berlin.
4. Frank, P. M. and B. Köppen-Seliger (1997). New developments using AI in fault diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence 10(1), 3-14.
5. Gertler, J. (1999). Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Engineering Systems. Marcel Dekker, Inc.. New York.
6. Isermann, R. (1994). Process fault detection and diagnosis methods. In: Proc. IFAC Symposium SAFEPROCESS'94, Helsinki, Finland (T. Ruokonen, Ed.). Vol. 2. Pergamon Press. Helsinki, Finland.
7. Moro, L. F. L. and D. Odloak (1995). Constrained multivariable control of fluid catalytic cracking converters. Journal of Process Control 5(1), 29-39.
8. Nelles, O. (2001). Nonlinear System Identification. From Classical Approaches to Neural Networks and Fuzzy Models. Springer-Verlag. Berlin.
9. Norgard, M., O. Ravn, N. M. Poulsen and L. K. Hansen (2000). Networks for Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems. Springer-Verlag. London.
10. Patan, K (2004a). Model-based actuator fault diagnosis using dynamic neural networks. In: Proc. 10th IEEE Int. Conf. Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics, MMAR 2004. Miedzyzdroje, Poland. pp. 743-748.
11. Patan, K (2004b). Training of the dynamic neural networks via constrained optimization. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2004, Budapest, Hungary. published on CD-ROM.
12. Patan, K. and J. Korbicz (2004). Artificial neural networks in fault diagnosis. In: Fault Diagnosis. Models, Artificial Intelligence, Applications (J. Korbicz, J. M. Kościelny, Z. Kowalczuk and W. Cholewa, Eds.). Springer-Verlag. Berlin. pp. 330-380.
13. Patan, K. and T. Parisini (2005). Identification of neural dynamic models for fault detection and isolation: the case of a real sugar evaporation process. Journal of Process Control 15, 67- 79. in press, available on-line.
14. Reinelt, W., A. Garulli and L. Ljung (2002). Comparing different approaches to model error modeling in robust identification. Automatica 38, 787-803.
15. Sotomayor, O. A. Z., D. Odloak, E. Alcorta-Garcia and P. Léon-Cantón (2004). Observer-based supervision and fault detection of a FCC unit model predictive control system. In: Proc. 7th Int. Symp. Dynamic and Control of Process Systems, DYCOPS 7, Massachusetts, USA.
16. Tsoi, A. Ch. and A. D. Back (1994). Locally recurrent globally feedforward networks: A critical review of architectures. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 5, 229-239.