In what circumstances should plans be public?

Journal of Planning Education and Research

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 491-502

  Kaza, Nikhil ^a   Hopkins, Lewis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Interorganizational systems; Plans; Public

Indexed keywords

EID: 67149137976     PISSN: 0739456X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0739456X08330978     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abbott, J. 2005 a. Does planning reduce uncertainty? Examining SEQ 2001. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Kansas City, MO.
2. Abbott, J. 2005 b. Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (3): 237-51.
3. Akerlof, G.A. 1970. The market for "lemons": Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 (3): 488-500.
4. Alexander, E.R. 2001. Why planning vs. markets is an oxymoron: Asking the right question. Planning and Markets 4 (1). Available at http://www.-pam.usc.edu/volume4/v4i1a2s1.html
5. Altshuler, A. 1965. The city planning process. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
6. Arrow, K. 1951. Social choice and individual values. New York: John Wiley.
7. Berke, P.R., D.R. Godschalk, E.J. Kaiser, and D.A. Rodriguez. 2006. Urban land use planning. 5 th ed. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
8. Bratman, M.E. 1987. Intention, plans and practical reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Bring New Orleans Back Commission. 2006 Action plan for New Orleans: The new American city. New Orleans, LA: Urban Planning Committee and Wallace Roberts and Todd, LLC.
10. Bruce, B.C., and D. Newman. 1978. Interacting plans. Cognitive Science 2: 195-233.
11. Chapin, F.S. 1957. Urban land use planning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
12. Christensen, K.S. 1993. Teaching savvy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 12: 202-12.
13. Christensen, K.S. 1999. Cities and complexity: Making intergovernmental decisions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Davidoff, P. 1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31 (4): 331-38.
15. Donaghy, K.P., and L.D. Hopkins. 2006. Coherentist theories of planning are possible and useful. Planning Theory 5 (2): 173-202.
16. Elster, J. 1984. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in rationality and irrationality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Trans. S. Sampson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Friend, J.K., and W.N. Jessop. 1969. Local government and strategic choice: An operational research approach to the processes of public planning. London: Tavistock.
19. Gordon, P., F.F. Deng, and H.W. Richardson. 2007. Private communities, market institutions, and planning. In Institutions and planning, ed. N. Verma, 187-206. New Brunswick, NJ: CUPR Press.
20. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
21. Healey, P. 2007. Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.
22. Helling, A. 1998. Collaborative visioning: Proceed with caution! Results from evaluating Atlanta's Vision 2020 Project. Journal of the American Planning Association 64 (3): 335-49.
23. Hoch, C. 1994. What planners do: Power, politics, and persuasion. Chicago: APA Planners Press.
24. Hoch, C. 2007. Making plans: Representation and intention. Planning Theory 6 (1): 16-35.
25. Hopkins, L.D. 2001. Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
26. Innes, J.E. 1995. Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14: 183-89.
27. Innes, J.E. 1996. Planning through consensus building: A new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (4): 460-72.
28. Innes, J.E. 2004. Consensus building: Clarification for the critics. Planning Theory 3 (1): 5-20.
29. Kaza, N. 2006. Tyranny of the median and costly consent: A reflection on the justification for participatory urban planning processes. Planning Theory 5 (3): 255-70.
30. Knaap, G.J., C. Ding, and L.D. Hopkins. 2001. The effect of light rail announcements on price gradients. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21 (1): 32-39.
31. Kwartler, M., and G. Longo. 2008. Visioning and visualization: People, pixels, and plans. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
32. Levin, P.H. 1976. Government and the planning process. London: Allen and Unwin.
33. Mandelbaum, S.J. 2000. Open moral communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Mastop, H., and A. Faludi. 1997. Evaluation of strategic plans: The performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24: 815-32.
35. Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Putnam, R.H., I. Light, X.D.S. Briggs, W.M. Rohe, A.C. Vidal, J. Hutchinson, J. Gress, and M. Woolcock. 2002. Symposium: Using social capital to help integrate planning theory, research, and practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 70 (2): 142-92.
37. Sager, T. 2002. Democratic planning and social choice dilemmas: Prelude to institutional planning theory. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
38. Schelling, T.C. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1: 143-86.
39. Sen, A.K. 1970. The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. Journal of Political Economy 78 (1): 152-57.
40. Sunstein, C.R. 2003. Why societies need dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Susskind, L.D., and J. Cruikshank. 1987. Breaking the impasse: Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. New York: Basic Books.
42. Susskind, L.D., and J. Cruikshank. 2006. Breaking Robert's rules: The new way to run your meeting, build consensus, and get results. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. Susskind, L.D., M.V.D. Wansem, and A. Ciccarelli. 2000. Mediating land use disputes: Pros and cons. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
44. Washington Post. 2007. A waiver for New Orleans; The city has a new plan to build on higher ground, but it needs another push from Washington. April 1. B06.
45. Webster, C., and L.W.-C. Lai. 2003. Property rights, planning, and markets. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
46. Wies, K. 1992. Cooperative strategy in regional transportation planning: Planning the Lake-Will North Expressway. PhD diss., University of Illinois at Chicago.