Are actuarial risk data used to make determinations of sex offender risk classification? An examination of sex offenders selected for enhanced registration and notification

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 676-692

  Blasko, Brandy L ^a   Jeglic, Elizabeth L ^b   Mercado, Cynthia Calkins ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; community notification; sex offender; sexually violent predator

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MANDATORY REPORTING; OFFENDER; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEXUAL CRIME; UNITED STATES;

CRIMINALS; HUMANS; MANDATORY REPORTING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEX OFFENSES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79960707815     PISSN: 0306624X     EISSN: 15526933     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306624X10372784     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andrews D. A., Bonta J. LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems ; 1995 :
2. Barbaree H. E., Seto M. C., Langton C., Peacock E.. Evaluating the predictive accuracy of six risk assessment instruments for adult sex offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2001 ; 28: 490-521
3. Boer D. R., Hart S. D., Kropp P. R., Webster C. D. Manual for the Sexual Violence Risk-20: Professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual offense. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Institute Against Family Violence ; 1997 :
4. The importance of assessment in sex offender management: An overview of key principles and practices. Silver Spring, MD: Author ; 2007 :
5. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2 nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ; 1988 :
6. Commonwealth v. Williams, 557 Pa. 285, 733 A.2d 593 (1999).
7. Craig L. A., Browne K. D., Stringer I., Beech A.. Sexual recidivism, a review of static, dynamic and actuarial predictors. Journal of Sexual Aggression. 2005 ; 11: 65-84 (Pubitemid 40145188)
8. Craig L. A., Thornton D., Beech A., Browne K. D.. The relationship of statistical and psychological risk markers to sexual reconviction in child molesters. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2007 ; 34: 314-329
9. DeClue G.. Avoiding garbage 2: Assessment for risk for sexual violence after long-term treatment. Journal of Psychiatry and Law. 2005 ; 33: 179-206
10. Doren D. M. Evaluating sex offenders: A manual for civil commitment and beyond. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage ; 2002 :
11. Elkovitch N., Viljeon J. L., Scalora M., Ullman D.. Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offense: The accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessment instruments. Behavioral Sciences and the Law. 2008 ; 26: 511-528
12. Epperson D. L., Kaul J. D., Huot S. J., Hesselton D., Alexander W., Goldman R. Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R). St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Corrections ; 1998 :
13. Gardner W., Lidz C. W., Mulvey E. P., Shaw E. C.. A comparison of actuarial methods for identifying repetitively violent patients with mental illnesses. Law and Human Behavior. 1996 ; 20: 35-48 (Pubitemid 26044330)
14. Gendreau P., Little T., Goggin C.. A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!. Criminology. 1996 ; 34: 575-607 (Pubitemid 126318089)
15. Gore K. S.. Adjusted actuarial risk assessment of sex offenders: The impact of clinical overrides on predictive accuracy. Dissertation Abstracts International. 2007 ; 68 (07). 4824B
16. Grove W. M., Meehl P. E.. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical and statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 1996 ; 2: 293-323 (Pubitemid 126408878)
17. Hanson R. K. The sexual predator: Law, policy, evaluation and treatment. Schlank A. Cohen F., ed. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute ; 1999: 8-1-8-24.
18. Hanson R. K.. The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence. Canadian Psychology. 2009 ; 50: 172-182
19. Hanson R. K., Bussiere M. T.. Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998 ; 66: 348-362 (Pubitemid 28208317)
20. Hanson R. K., Harris A. Sex Offender Need Assessment Rating (SONAR): A measure for measuring change in risk level. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Department of Solicitor General of Canada ; 2000a :
21. Hanson R. K., Harris A. J. R.. Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 2000b ; 27: 6-35
22. Hanson R. K., Morton-Bourgon K. E.. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005 ; 73: 1154-1163 (Pubitemid 43161113)
23. Hanson R. K., Morton-Bourgon K. E.. The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment. 2009 ; 21: 1-21
24. Hanson R. K., Thornton D. Static-99: Improving actuarial risk assessment for sex offender. Ottawa, Ontario: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada ; 1999 :
25. Hanson R. K., Thornton D.. Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior. 2000 ; 24: 119-136 (Pubitemid 30104438)
26. Harris G. T., Rice M. E., Cormier C. A.. Prospective replication of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide in predicting violent recidivism among forensic patients. Law and Human Behavior. 2002 ; 26: 377-395
27. Jackson R. L., Hess D. R.. Evaluation for civil commitment of sex offenders: A survey of experts. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2007 ; 19: 409-448
28. Janus E. S., Prentky R. A.. Forensic use of actuarial risk assessment: How a developing science can enhance accuracy and accountability. Federal Sentencing Reporter. 2004a ; 16: 176-181
29. Janus E. S., Prentky R. A.. Forensic use of actuarial risk assessment with sex offenders: Accuracy, admissibility, and accountability. American Criminal Law Review. 2004b ; 40: 1443-1499 (Pubitemid 38640093)
30. Levenson J. S.. Sexual predator civil commitment: A comparison of selected and released offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2004 ; 48: 638-648 (Pubitemid 39453109)
31. Levenson J. S., Cotter L. P.. The effect of Megan's Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 2005 ; 21: 49-66
32. Levenson J. S., Morin J. W.. Factors predicting selection of sexually violent predators for civil commitment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2006 ; 50: 609-629 (Pubitemid 44629985)
33. Lucken K., Bales W.. Florida's Sexually Violent Predator Program: An examination of risk and civil commitment eligibility. Crime & Delinquency. 2008 ; 54: 95-127
34. Miller H. A., Amenta A. E., Conroy M. A.. Sexually violent predator evaluations: Empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions. Law and Human Behavior. 2005 ; 29: 29-54 (Pubitemid 41283771)
35. Monahan J. Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage ; 1981 :
36. Nunes K. L., Firestone P., Bradford J. M., Greenberg D. M., Broom I.. A comparison of modified versions of the Static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide (SORAG). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2002 ; 14: 253-269
37. Quinsey V. L., Harris G. T., Rice M. E., Cormier C. A. Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. 2 nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association ; 2006 :
38. Quinsey V., Harris G., Rice M., LaLumiere M.. Assessing treatment efficacy in outcome studies of sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 1993 ; 8: 524-530
39. Rice M. E., Harris G. T.. Cross-validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior. 1997 ; 21: 231-241 (Pubitemid 27202869)
40. Sampson R. J., Laub J. H.. Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology. 2003 ; 41: 555-592 (Pubitemid 38390303)
41. Seto M.. Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders. Psychological Assessment. 2005 ; 17: 156-167 (Pubitemid 41023389)
42. Stadtland C., Hollweg M., Kleindienst N., Dietl J., Reich U., Nedopil N.. Risk prediction and assessment of violent and sexual recidivism in sex offenders: Long term predictive validity of four risk assessment instruments. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. 2005 ; 16: 92-108 (Pubitemid 41194320)
43. Terry K. J. Sexual offenses and offenders: Theory, practice, and policy. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth ; 2006 :
44. Texas Health & Safety Code § 841.000-841.150 (2000).
45. Thornton D.. Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2002 ; 14: 139-153
46. VranaG. C.SrogaM.GuzzoL. (2008). Predictive validity of the LSI-OR among a sample of adult male sexual assaulters. Unpublished manuscript.
47. Watson T., Vess J.. Risk assessment of child-victim sex offenders for extended supervision in New Zealand. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 2007 ; 18: 235-247 (Pubitemid 46681086)
48. Zimring F. E. American travesty: Legal responses to adolescent sexual offending. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press ; 2004 :