A comparison of activity-based to event-based prospective memory

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 632-640

  Brewer, Gene A ^a   Marsh, Richard L ^b   Clark Foos, Arlo ^b   Meeks, J Thadeus ^b   Cook, Gabriel I ^c   Hicks, Jason L ^d  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

^c CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE   (United States)

^d LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT; GOAL ATTAINMENT; HUMAN; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 79960706700     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1733     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80(3, Pt. 2), 1-46.
2. Cockburn, J., & Smith, P. T. (1991). The relative influence of intelligence and age on everyday memory. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 46, 31-36.
3. Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix, & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performance (pp.409-422). New York: Elsevier Science.
4. Dembitzer, A., & Lai, E. J. (2003). Retained surgical instrument. New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 228.
5. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717-726.
6. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Richardson, S. L., Guynn, M. J., & Cunfer, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 996-1007.
7. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 286-290.
8. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Manzi, M., Cochran, B., & Baker, M. (2000). Prospective memory and aging: Forgetting intentions over short delays. Psychology and Aging, 15, 671-683.
9. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Smith, R. E., & Shaw, P. (1998). Habitual prospective memory and aging: Remembering intentions and forgetting actions. Psychological Science, 9, 284-289.
10. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., et al. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327-342.
11. Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., & Marsh, R. L. (2005). Detecting event-based prospective memory occurring within and outside the focus of attention. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 1-11.
12. Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 430-444.
13. Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Russell, E. J. (2000). The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1160-1169.
14. Kidder, D. P., Park, D. C., Hertzog, C., & Morrell, R. W. (1997). Prospective memory and aging: The effects of working memory and prospective memory task load. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 4, 93-112.
15. Kvavilashvili, L., & Ellis, J. (1996). Varieties of intentions: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp.23-52). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Loftus, E. F. (1971). Memory for intentions: The effect of presence of a cue and interpolated activity. Psychonomic Science, 23, 315-316.
17. Mäntylä, T. (1994). Remembering to remember: Adult age differences in prospective memory. Journal of Gerontology, 49, 276-282.
18. Marsh, R. L., Hancock, T. W., & Hicks, J. L. (2002). The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 604-610.
19. Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 336-349.
20. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Watson, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 652-659.
21. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Landau, J. D. (1998). An investigation of everyday prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 633-643.
22. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2006). Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1037-1045.
23. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2007). On beginning to understand the role of context in prospective memory. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective Memory: Cognitive, Neuroscience, Developmental, and Applied Perspectives (pp.77-100). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 861-870.
25. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 127-144.
26. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Graham, T., & Rall, E. (2004). Delaying execution of intentions: Overcoming the costs of interruptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 533-547.
27. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Stout, A. C., & Morgan, Z. (2003). Aging and maintaining intentions over delays: Do it or lose it. Psychology and Aging, 18, 823-835.
28. McNerney, M. W., & West, R. (2007). An imperfect relationship between prospective memory and the prospective interference effect. Memory and Cognition, 35, 275-282.
29. Park, D. C., Hertzog, C., Kidder, D. P., Morrell, R. W., & Mayhorn, C. B. (1997). Effect of age on event-based and time-based prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 12, 314-327.
30. Rabbit, P. (1996). Commentary: Why are studies of 'prospective memory' planless?. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp.239-248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Rogers, S. O., Gawande, A. A., Kwaan, M., Puopolo, A. L., Yoon, C., Brennan, T. A., et al. (2006). Analysis of surgical errors in closed malpractice claims at 4 liability insurers. Surgery, 140, 25-33.
32. Schaefer, E. G., Kozak, M. V., & Sagness, K. (1998). The role of enactment in prospective remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26, 644-650.
33. Sellen, A. J., Louie, G., Harris, J. E., & Wilkins, A. J. (1997). What brings intentions to mind? An in situ study of prospective memory. Memory, 5, 483-507.