Hybrid object-based approach for land use/land cover mapping using high spatial resolution imagery

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1025-1043

  Malinverni, Eva Savina ^a   Tassetti, Anna Nora ^a   Mancini, Adriano ^a   Zingaretti, Primo ^a   Frontoni, Emanuele ^a   Bernardini, Annamaria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

Author keywords

ADS40; CORINE land cover; Hybrid classification; LULC; Stability map; Texture

Indexed keywords

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE RESOLUTION; LAND COVER; LAND USE; MAPPING; PIXEL; REMOTE SENSING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION;

EID: 79960685342     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2011.566569     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ascani, A., Frontoni, E., Mancini, A. and Zingaretti, P., 2008. Feature group matching for appearance-based localization. In: International conference on intelligent robots and systems IROS 2008 Nice. 3933-3938.
2. Breiman, L., et al., 1984. Classification and regression trees. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.
3. European Environment Agency (EEA)., 1994. CORINE land cover - part 1: methodology. Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/COR0-part1 [Accessed 10 October 2010].
4. European Environment Agency (EEA)., 2007. CLC2006 technical guidelines - Technical report. Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/technical_report_2007_17 [Accessed 10 October 2010].
5. Friedman, T.H. and Tibshirani, R., 2000. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. The Annals of Statistics, 38 (2), 337-374.
6. Gao, Y. and Mas, J.F., 2008. A comparison of the performance of pixel based and object based classifications over images with various spatial resolution. On Line Journal of Earth Science, 2, 27-35.
7. Haralick, R., Shanmugam, K., and Dinstein, I., 1973. Texture features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cibernetics, Smc-3, 610-621.
8. Idrissa, M. and Acheroy, M., 2002. Texture classification using Gabor filters. Pattern Recognition Letters, 23, 1095-1102.
9. Knight, J.F. and Lunetta, R.S., 2003. An experimental assessment of minimum mapping unit size. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, 9.
10. Laws, K.I., 1980. Textured image segmentation. Dissertation (PhD). University of Southern California.
11. Liu, H. and Motoda, H., 2008. Computational methods of feature selection. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
12. Lu, D. and Weng, Q., 2007. A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28 (5), 823-870.
13. Matinfar, H.R., et al., 2007. Comparisons of object-oriented and pixel-based classification of land use/land cover types based on Lansadsat7, Etm+ spectral bands (case study: arid region of Iran). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environment Science, 2 (4), 448-456.
14. Schapire, R.E. and Singer, Y., 1999. Improved boosting algorithms using confidence-rated predictions. Machine Learning, 37 (3), 297-336.
15. Shackelford, A.K. and Davis, C.H., 2003. A combined fuzzy pixel-based and object-based approach for classification of high-resolution multispectral data over urban areas. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41 (10), 2354-2363.
16. Sims, F.M. and Mesev, V., 2007. Use of ancillary data in object based classification of high resolution satellite data. In: Urban remote sensing joint event. URBAN 2007 - URS 2007. Paris, 1-10.
17. Stehman, S.V., et al., 2003. Thematic accuracy of the 1992 national land-cover data for the eastern United States: statistical methodology and regional results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, 500-516.
18. Sutton, C.D., 2005. Classification and regression trees, bagging, and boosting. In: C.R. Rao, E.J. Wegman and J.L. Solka (Eds), Handbook of Statistics. vol. 24. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. Tabb, M. and Ahuja, N., 1997. Multiscale image segmentation by integrated edge and region detection. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6 (5), 642-655.
20. Wang, L., Sousa, W., and Gong, P., 2004. Integration of object-based and pixel-based classification for mangrove mapping with IKONOS imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25 (24), 5655-5668.
21. Wickham, J.D., et al., 2004. Thematic accuracy of the 1992 national land-cover data for the western United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 91, 452-468.
22. Woodcock, C.E. and Gopal, S., 2000. Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 14 (2), 153-172.
23. Yu, Y.W. and Wang, J.H., 1999. Image segmentation based on region growing and edge detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics. vol. 6. 798-803.
24. Yuan, F. and Bauer, M.E., 2006. Mapping impervious surface area using high resolution imagery: a comparison of object-based and per pixel classification. In: Proceedings of ASPRS 2006 annual conference, Reno, Nevada.
25. Zingaretti, P., et al., 2009. A hybrid approach to land cover classification from multispectral images. In: 15th International conference on image analysis and processing (ICIAP), 8-11 September 2009 Vietri sul Mare, Italy.
26. Zingaretti, P., Gasparroni, M., and Vecci, L., 1998. Fast chain coding of region boundaries. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20 (4), 407-415.