Integration of object-based and pixel-based classification for mapping mangroves with IKONOS imagery

International Journal of Remote Sensing

Volumn 25, Issue 24, 2004, Pages 5655-5668

  Wang, L ^a   Sousa, W P ^b   Gong, P ^b  

^a TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; OBJECT RECOGNITION; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFICATION (MLC); MULTISPECTRAL IMAGES; NEAREST NEIGHBORHOOD (NN) CLASSIFICATION; SPECTRAL SEPARABILITY;

IMAGE SENSORS;

MANGROVE; MULTISPECTRAL IMAGE; PANCHROMATIC IMAGE; VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION; VEGETATION MAPPING;

IMAGE ANALYSIS; MANGROVE; SENSORS;

CENTRAL AMERICA; COLON [PANAMA]; PANAMA [CENTRAL AMERICA]; PUNTA GALETA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 10844220846     PISSN: 01431161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014311602331291215     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baatz, M., and Schape, A., 1999, Object-oriented and multi-scale image analysis in semantic networks. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Operationalization of Remote Sensing, 16-20 August 1999 (Enschede, The Netherlands: ITC).
2. Blaschke, T., and Strobl, J., 2001, What's wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and GIS. GeoBITIGIS 6, 12-17.
3. Cufi, X., Munoz, X., Freixenet, J., and Marti, J., 2002, A review of image segmentation techniques integrating region and boundary information. Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, 120, 1-39.
4. Ellison, A. M., and Farnsworth, E. J., 1996, Anthropogenic disturbance of Caribbean mangrove ecosystems: past impacts, present trends, and future predictions. Biotropica, 4, 549-565.
5. Evans, C., Jones, R., Svalbe, I., and Berman, M., 2002, Segmenting Multispectral Landsat TM images into field units. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 5, 1054-1064.
6. Farnsworth, E. J., and Ellison, A. M., 1997, The global conservation status of mangroves. Ambio, 6, 328-334.
7. Gao, J., 1998, A hybrid method toward accurate mapping of mangroves in a marginal habitat from SPOT Multispectral data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10, 1887-1899.
8. Gao, J., 1999, A comparative study on spatial and spectral resolutions of satellite data in mapping mangrove forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14, 2823-2833.
9. Green, E. P., Clark, C. D., Mumby, P. J., Edwards, A. J., and Ellis, A. C., 1998, Remote sensing techniques for mangrove mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 5, 935-956.
10. Kathiresan, K., and Bingham, B. L., 2001, Biology of mangroves and mangrove ecosystems. Advances in Marine Biology, 40, 81-251.
11. Kay, R. J., Hick, P. T., and Houghton, H. J., 1991, Remote Sensing of Kimberley rainforests. In Kimberley Rainforests, edited by N, L. McKenzie, R. B. Johnston, and P. O. Kendrick (Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty and Sons), pp.41-51.
12. Kettig, R. L., and Landgrebe, D. A., 1976, Classification of multispectral image data by extraction and classification of homogeneous objects. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1 19-26.
13. Lobo, A., 1997, Image segmentation and discriminant analysis for the identification of land cover units in ecology. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 5, 1136-1145.
14. Lugo, A. E., and Snedaker, S. C., 1974, The ecology of mangroves. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 5, 39-64.
15. Mumby, P. J., and Edwards, A. J., 2002, Mapping marine environments with IKONOS imagery: enhanced spatial resolution can deliver greater thematic accuracy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2-3, 248-257.
16. Pal, N. R., and Pal, S. K., 1993, A review on image segmentation techniques. Pattern Recognition, 9, 1277-1294.
17. PCI, 2001, PCI Geomatics 8.2 User Manual, Part: signature separability, Ontario, Canada, http://www.Pcigeomatics.com/.
18. Rasolofoharinoro, M., Blasco, F., Bellan, M. F., Aizpuru, M., Gauquelin, T., and Denis, J., 1998, A remote sensing based methodology for mangrove studies in Madagascar. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10, 1873-1886.
19. Richards, J. A., 1986, Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An introduction (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).
20. Saenger, P., Hegerl, E., and Davis, J., 1983, Global status of mangrove ecosystems. The Environmentalist, 3, 1-88.
21. Scheiewe, J., Tufte, L., and Ehlers, M., 2001, Potential and problems of multi-scale segmentation methods in remote sensing. GeoBITIGIS, 6, 34-39.
22. Shaban, M. A., and Dikshit, O., 2001, Improvement of classification in urban areas by the use of textural features: the case study of Lucknow City, Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 4 565-593.
23. Tilton, J. C., 1998, Image segmentation by region growing and spectral clustering with a natural convergence criterion. Proceedings of the 1998 International Geoscience Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS'98), 6 10 July 1998 (Seattle, WA), pp. 1766-1768.
24. Venkataratnam, L., and Thammappa, S. S., 1993, Mapping and monitoring areas under prawn farming. Interface: A Bulletin from the NRSA Data Centre, 4, 4-7.