Cereal domestication and evolution of branching: Evidence for soft selection in the TB1 orthologue of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum [L.] R. Br.)

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2011, Pages

  Remigereau, Marie Stanislas ^a,b,d   Lakis, Ghayas ^a   Rekima, Samah ^a   Leveugle, Magalie ^a   Fontaine, Michaël C ^a   Langin, Thierry ^b,e   Sarr, Aboubakry ^a,c   Robert, Thierry ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

^b INSTITUTE OF PLANT SCIENCES PARIS SACLAY IPS2   (France)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e Diversity and Ecophysiology of Cereals   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFRICAN; ARTICLE; CEREAL; COMPARATIVE GENE MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOMESTICATION; ETHNIC GROUP; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE SIGNATURE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC DIFFERENCE; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; MAIZE; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ORTHOLOGY; PEARL MILLET; PLANT GENE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING; TB1 GENE; TEOSINTEBRANCHED 1; CHROMOSOME MAP; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; HYBRIDIZATION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PENNISETUM; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

PENNISETUM GLAUCUM; SETARIA ITALICA; ZEA MAYS;

TB1 PROTEIN, ZEA MAYS; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

CEREALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CLONING, MOLECULAR; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENETIC LOCI; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; PENNISETUM; PLANT PROTEINS; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID;

EID: 79960679382     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022404     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Paterson AH, Lin YR, Li Z, Schertz KF, Doebley JF, et al. (1995) Convergent domestication of cereal crops by independent mutations at corresponding genetic loci. Science 269: 1714-1718.
2. Frary A, Doganlar S, Daunay MC, Tanksley SD, (2003) QTL analysis of morphological traits in eggplant and implications for conservation of gene function during evolution of solanaceous species. Theor Appl Genet 107: 359-370.
3. Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD, (2006) The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127: 1309-1321.
4. Ross-Ibarra J, Morrell PL, Gaut BS, (2007) Colloquium Papers: Plant domestication, a unique opportunity to identify the genetic basis of adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (Suppl 1): 8641-8648.
5. Harlan JR, (1975) Crops and man. Madison American Society of Agronomy Inc. and Crop Science Society of America Inc.
6. Purugganan MD, Fuller DQ, (2009) The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature 457: 843-848.
7. Doust A, (2007) Architectural evolution and its implications for domestication in grasses. Ann Bot (Lond) 100: 941-950.
8. Arendt J, Reznick D, (2008) Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what have we learned about the genetics of adaptation? Trends Ecol Evol 23: 26-32.
9. Wood TE, Burke JM, Rieseberg LH, (2005) Parallel genotypic adaptation: when evolution repeats itself. Genetica 123: 157-170.
10. Gompel N, Prud'homme B, (2009) The causes of repeated genetic evolution. Dev Biol 332: 36-47.
11. Stern DL, Orgogozo V, (2009) Is genetic evolution predictable? Science 323: 746-751.
12. Poncet V, Lamy F, Devos K, Gale M, Sarr A, et al. (2000) Genetic control of domestication traits in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L., Poacae). Theor Appl Genet 100: 147-159.
13. Robert T, Luxereau A, Mariac C, Ali K, Allinne C, et al. (2003) Gestion de la diversité en milieu paysan: influence de facteurs anthropiques et des flux de gènes sur la variabilité génétique des formes cultivées et spontanées du mil (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) dans deux localités du Niger. Actes du 4ème colloque national du BRG Le patrimoine génétique, la diversité et la ressource. (La Châtre, 14-16 octobre 2002).
14. Poncet V, Martel E, Allouis S, Devos M, Lamy F, et al. (2002) Comparative analysis of QTLs affecting domestication traits between two domesticated x wild pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L., Poaceae) crosses. Theor Appl Genet 104: 965-975.
15. Cubas P, Lauter N, Doebley J, Coen E, (1999) The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J 18: 215-222.
16. Doebley J, Stec A, Hubbard L, (1997) The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386: 485-488.
17. Ramsay L, Comadran J, Druka A, Marshall DF, Thomas WTB, et al. (2011) INTERMEDIUM-C, a modifier of lateral spikelet fertility in barley, is an ortholog ot the maize domestication gene TEOSINTE BRANCHED 1. Nature Genetics 43: 169-173.
18. Takeda T, Suwa Y, Suzuki M, Kitano H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, et al. (2003) The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. Plant J 33: 513-520.
19. Aguilar-Martinez JA, Poza-Carrion C, Cubas P, (2007) Arabidopsis BRANCHED1 acts as an integrator of branching signals within axillary buds. Plant Cell 19: 458-472.
20. Kebrom TH, Burson BL, Finlayson SA, (2006) Phytochrome B Represses Teosinte Branched1 Expression and Induces Sorghum Axillary Bud Outgrowth in Response to Light Signals. Plant Physiol 140: 1109-1117.
21. Finlayson SA, Krishnareddy SR, Kebrom TH, Casal JJ, (2010) Phytochrome regulation of branching in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 152: 1914-1927.
22. McSteen P, (2009) Hormonal regulation of branching in grasses. Plant Physiol 149: 46-55.
23. McSteen P, Leyser O, (2005) Shoot branching. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56: 353-374.
24. Doebley J, Stec A, (1991) Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics 129: 285-295.
25. Doebley J, Stec A, Gustus C, (1995) teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141: 333-346.
26. Westerbergh A, Doebley J, (2004) Quantitative trait loci controlling phenotypes related to the perennial versus annual habit in wild relatives of maize. Theor Appl Genet 109: 1544-1553.
27. Wang RL, Stec A, Hey J, Lukens L, Doebley J, (1999) The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398: 236-239.
28. Clark RM, Wagler TN, Quijada P, Doebley J, (2006) A distant upstream enhancer at the maize domestication gene tb1 has pleiotropic effects on plant and inflorescent architecture. Nat Genet 38: 594-597.
29. Lukens L, Doebley J, (2001) Molecular evolution of the teosinte branched gene among maize and related grasses. Mol Biol Evol 18: 627-638.
30. Doust A, Devos K, Gadberry M, Gale M, Kellogg E, (2004) Genetic control of branching in foxtail millet. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9045-9050.
31. Hubbard L, McSteen P, Doebley J, Hake S, (2002) Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched1 correlate with growth suppression in maize and teosinte. Genetics 162: 1927-1935.
32. Doust AN, Kellogg EA, (2006) Effect of genotype and environment on branching in weedy green millet (Setaria viridis) and domesticated foxtail millet (Setaria italica) (Poaceae). Mol Ecol 15: 1335-1349.
33. Doebley J, Stec A, (1999) The structure of teosinte-branched one: a progress report. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 73: 82-83.
34. Innan H, Kim Y, (2004) Pattern of polymorphism after strong artificial selection in a domestication event. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 10667-10672.
35. Hudson RR, Kreitman M, Aguadé M, (1987) A test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116: 153-159.
36. Tajima F, (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585-595.
37. Fu YX, Li WH, (1993) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133: 693-709.
38. Amblard S, Pernès J, (1989) The identification of cultivated pearl millet (Pennisetum) amongst plant impressions on pottery from Oued Chebbi (Dhar Oualata, Mauritania). African Archaeological Review 7: 117-126.
39. D'Andrea AC, Klee M, Casey J, (2001) Archaeobotanical Evidence for Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum) in Sub-Saharan West Africa. Antiquity 75: 341-348.
40. Hermisson J, Pennings PS, (2005) Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics 169: 2335-2352.
41. Kim Y, (2006) Allele frequency distribution under recurrent selective sweeps. Genetics 172: 1967-1978.
42. Kim Y, Stephan W, (2003) Selective sweeps in the presence of interference among partially linked loci. Genetics 164: 389-398.
43. Lauter N, Doebley J, (2002) Genetic variation for phenotypically invariant traits detected in teosinte: implications for the evolution of novel forms. Genetics 160: 333-342.
44. Robert T, Khalfallah N, Martel E, Lamy F, Poncet V, et al. (2011) Pennisetum. in: Wild crop relatives genomic and breeding resources. In: Kole C, editors. Millet and Grasses London NewYork Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht.
45. Mariac C, Robert T, Allinne C, Remigereau MS, Luxereau A, et al. (2006) Genetic diversity and gene flow among pearl millet crop/weed complex: a case study. Theor Appl Genet 113: 1003-1014.
46. Wallace B, (1968) Topics in Population Genetics. New York W. W. Norton.
47. Allinne C, Mariac C, Vigouroux Y, Bezancon G, Couturon E, et al. (2008) Role of seed flow on the pattern and dynamics of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum [L.] R. Br.) genetic diversity assessed by AFLP markers: a study in south-western Niger. Genetica 133: 167-178.
48. Zhai W, Nielsen R, Slatkin M, (2009) An investigation of the statistical power of neutrality tests based on comparative and population genetic data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26: 273-283.
49. Alonso-Blanco C, Aarts MGM, Bentsink L, Keurentjes JJB, Reymond M, et al. (2009) What has natural variation taught us about plant development, physiology, and adaptation? Plant Cell 21: 1877-1896.
50. Martin C, Ellis N, Rook F, (2010) Do transcription factors play special roles in adaptive variation? Plant physiology 154: 506-511.
51. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I, (2004) VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 32: W273-279.
52. Qi X, Lindup S, Pittaway TS, Allouis S, Gale MD, et al. (2001) Development of simple sequence repeat markers from bacterial artificial chromosomes without subcloning. Biotechniques 31: 355, 358-362.
53. Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K, (2008) MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform 9: 299-306.
54. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R, (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19: 2496-2497.
55. Hudson RR, (2002) Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18: 337-338.
56. Ramirez-Soriano A, Calafell F, (2008) FABSIM: a software for generating FST distributions with various ascertainment biases. Bioinformatics 24: 2790-2791.
57. Tenaillon MI, U'Ren J, Tenaillon O, Gaut BS, (2004) Selection versus demography: a multilocus investigation of the domestication process in maize. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1214-1225.
58. Eyre-Walker A, Gaut RL, Hilton H, Feldman DL, Gaut BS, (1998) Investigation of the bottleneck leading to the domestication of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 4441-4446.