Expression patterns and mutant phenotype of teosinte branched1 correlate with growth suppression in maize and teosinte

Genetics

Volumn 162, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 1927-1935

  Hubbard, Lauren ^a   McSteen, Paula ^a   Doebley, John ^b   Hake, Sarah ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE TB1; GROWTH INHIBITION; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; INFLORESCENCE; MAIZE; MERISTEM; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENETICS; PLANT GROWTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SEX DETERMINATION; STAMEN; TEOSINTE;

CEREALS; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENES, PLANT; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANT PROTEINS; RNA, MESSENGER; RNA, PLANT; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEX DETERMINATION (GENETICS); SPECIES SPECIFICITY; ZEA MAYS;

EMBRYOPHYTA; EUKARYOTA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0036961425     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BENNETZEN, J., E. BUCKLER, V. CHANDLER, J. DOEBLEY, J. DORWEILER et al., 2001 Genetic evidence and the origin of maize. Latin American Antiquity 12: 84-86.
2. BENSEN, R. J., G. S. JOHAL, V. C. CRANE, J. T. TOSSBERG, P. S. SCHNABLE et al., 1995 Cloning and characterization of the maize An1 gene. Plant Cell 7: 75-84.
3. CHATFIELD, S. P., P. STIRNBERG, B. G. FORDE and O. LEYSER, 2000 The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 24: 159-169.
4. CHEN, J., and S. DELLAPORTA, 1994 Urea-based plant DNA miniprep, pp. 526-538 in The Maize Handbook, edited by M. FREELING and V. WALBOT. Springer-Verlag, New York.
5. CHENG, P. C., R. I. GREYSON and D. B. WALDEN, 1983 Organ initiation and the development of unisexual flowers in the tassel and ear of Zea mays. Am. J. Bot. 70: 450-462.
6. CUBAS, P., N. LAUTER, J. DOEBLEY and E. COEN, 1999 The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. Plant J. 18: 215-222.
7. CUBAS, P., E. COEN and J. M. N. ZAPATER, 2001 Ancient asymmetries in the evolution of flowers. Curr. Biol. 11: 1050-1052.
8. DELLAPORTA, S. L., and A. CALDERON-URREA, 1994 The sex determination process in maize. Science 266: 1501-1505.
9. DELONG, A., A. CALDERON-URREA and S. L. DELLAPORTA, 1993 Sex determination gene TASSELSEED2 of maize encodes a shortchain alcohol dehydrogenase required for stage-specific floral organ abortion. Cell 74: 757-768.
10. DOEBLEY, J., and A. STEC, 1991 Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics 129: 285-295.
11. 2 populations. Genetics 134: 559-570.
12. DOEBLEY, J., A. STEC and C. GUSTUS, 1995a teosinte branched1 and the origin of maize: evidence for epistasis and the evolution of dominance. Genetics 141: 333-346.
13. DOEBLEY, J., A. STEC and B. KENT, 1995b SUPPRESSOR OF SESSILE SPIKELETS1 (SOS1): a dominant mutant affecting inflorescence development in maize. Am. J. Bot. 82: 571-577.
14. DOEBLEY, J., A. STEC and L. HUBBARD, 1997 The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386: 485-488.
15. FREELING, M., and D. SCHWARTZ, 1973 Genetic relationships between the multiple alcohol dehydrogenases of maize. Genetics 8: 27-36.
16. ILTlS, H. H., 1983 From teosinte to maize: the catastrophic sexual transmutation. Science 222: 886-894.
17. ILTIS, H. H., 1986 Maize Evolution and Agricultural Origins. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
18. IRISH, E. E., and T. M. NELSON, 1991 Identification of multiple stages in the conversion of maize meristems from vegetative to floral development. Development 112: 891-898.
19. IRISH, E. E., J. A. LANGDALE and T. M. NELSON, 1994 Interactions between tasselseed genes and other sex determining genes in maize. Dev. Genet. 15: 155-171.
20. JACKSON, D., 1992 In situ hybridization in plants, pp. 163-174 in Plant Molecular Pathology: A Practical Approach, edited by S. J. GURR, M. J. MCPHERSON and D. J. BOWLES. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
21. JACKSON, D., B. VEIT and S. HAKE, 1994 Expression of maize KNOTTED1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development 120: 405-413.
22. KOSUGI, S., and Y. OHASHI, 2002 DNA binding and dimerization specificity and potential targets for the TCP protein family. Plant J. 30: 337-348.
23. LUO, D., R. CARPENTER, C. VINCENT, L. COPSEY and E. COEN, 1996 Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383: 794-799.
24. MCDANIEL, C. N., and F. C. HSU, 1976 Position-dependent development of tobacco meristems. Nature 259: 564-565.
25. NAPOLI, C. A., and J. RUEHLE, 1996 New mutations affecting meristem growth and potential in Petunia hybrida Vilm. J. Hered. 87: 371-377.
26. NEUFFER, M. G., E. H. COE and S. R. WESSLER, 1997 Mutants of Maize. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY.
27. PIGLIUCCI, M., and J. SCHMITT, 1999 Genes affecting phenotypic plasticity in Arabidopsis: pleiotropic effects and reproductive fitness of photomorphogenic mutants. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 551-562.
28. RUSSELL, W. K., and C. W. STUBER, 1983 Effects of photoperiod and temperatures on the duration of vegetative growth in maize. Crop Sci. 23: 847-850.
29. SCHMITT, J., and S. A. DUDLEY, 1996 Testing the adaptive plasticity hypothesis for plant responses to neighbors. Plant Species Biol. 11: 59-67.
30. STEEVES, T. A., and I. M. SUSSEX, 1989 Patterns in Plant Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
31. SUSSEX, I. M., and N. M. KERK, 2001 The evolution of plant architecture. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4: 33-37.
32. VEIT, B., R. J. SCHMIDT, S. HAKE and M. F. YANOFSKY, 1993 Maize floral development - new genes and old mutants. Plant Cell 5: 1205-1215.
33. WANG, R.-L., A. STEC, J. HEY, L. LUKENS and J. DOEBLEY, 1999 The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398: 236-239.