The functional fidelity of individual differences research: The case for context-matching

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 435-450

  Matthews, Gerald ^a   Warm, Joel S ^a   Reinerman Jones, Lauren E ^b   Langheim, Lisa K ^a   Guznov, Svyatoslav ^a   Shaw, Tyler H ^c   Finomore, Victor S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diagnostic monitoring; Individual differences; Operator selection; Personality; Skilled performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960678948     PISSN: 1463922X     EISSN: 1464536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1463922X.2010.549247     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arthur, W., Barrett, G.V., and Alexander, R.A., 1991. Prediction of vehicular accident involvement: a meta-analysis. Human Performance, 4, 89-105.
2. Bell, S.T., 2007. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595-615.
3. Boyes, M.E. and French, J., 2009. Having a cyberball: using a ball-throwing game as an experimental social stressor to examine the relationship between neuroticism and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 396-401.
4. Braver, T.S., Gray, J.R., and Burgess, G.C., 2007. Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In: A.R.A. Conway, et al., eds. Variation in working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 76-108.
5. Canli, T., 2009. Neuroimaging of personality. In: P.J. Corr, and G. Matthews, eds. Cambridge handbook of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 305-322.
6. Cox-Fuenzalida, L., Swickert, R., and Hittner, J.B., 2004. Effects of neuroticism and workload history on performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 447-456.
7. Desmond, P.A. and Matthews, G., 2009. Individual differences in stress and fatigue in two field studies of driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12, 265-276.
8. Drury, C.G., et al., 2009. Using individual differences to build a common core dataset for aviation security studies. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 459-479.
9. Emo, A.K., et al., 2004. Stress vulnerability, coping, and risk-taking behaviors during simulated driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48, 1228-1232.
10. Eysenck, H.J., 1967. The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
11. Eysenck, M.W., 2010. Attentional control theory of anxiety: recent developments. In: A. Gruszka, G. Matthews, and B. Szymura, eds. Handbook of individual differences in cognition: attention, memory and executive control. New York: Springer, 195-204.
12. Finomore, V.S., Matthews, G., and Warm, J.S., 2009. Predicting vigilance: a fresh look at an old problem. Ergonomics, 52, 791-808.
13. Guznov, S., Matthews, G., and Warm, J.S., 2010. Team member personality, performance and stress in a Roboflag synthetic task environment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, 1679-1683.
14. Helton, W.S., Matthews, G., and Warm, J.S., 2009. Stress state mediation between environmental variables and performance: the case of noise and vigilance. Acta Psychologica, 130, 204-213.
15. Hennessy, D.A., Wiesenthal, D.L., and Kohn, P.M., 2000. The influence of traffic congestion, daily hassles, and trait stress susceptibility on state driver stress: an interactive perspective. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 5, 162-179.
16. Hockey, G.R.J., 1984. Varieties of attentional state: the effects of the environment. In: R. Parasuraman, and D.R. Davies, eds. Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press, 449-483.
17. Humphreys, M.S. and Revelle, W., 1984. Personality, motivation and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. Psychological Review, 91, 153-184.
18. Kanfer, R., et al., 1995. Personality and intelligence in industrial and organizational psychology. In: D.H. Saklofske, and M. Zeidner, eds. International handbook of personality and intelligence. New York: Plenum, 577-602.
19. Koelega, H.S., 1992. Extraversion and vigilance performance: thirty years of inconsistencies. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 239-258.
20. Lazarus, R.S., 1999. Stress and emotion: a new synthesis. New York: Springer.
21. Matthews, G., 1997. An introduction to the cognitive science of personality and emotion. In: G. Matthews, ed. Cognitive science perspectives on personality and emotion. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 3-30.
22. Matthews, G., 1999. Personality and skill: a cognitive-adaptive framework. In: P.L. Ackerman, P.C. Kyllonen, and R.D. Roberts, eds. The future of learning and individual differences research: processes, traits, and content. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 251-270.
23. Matthews, G., 2001. Levels of transaction: a cognitive science framework for operator stress. In: P.A. Hancock, and P.A. Desmond, eds. Stress, workload and fatigue. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 5-33.
24. Matthews, G., 2002. Towards a transactional ergonomics for driver stress and fatigue. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 195-211.
25. Matthews, G., 2008. Personality and information processing: a cognitive-adaptive theory. In: G.J. Boyle, G. Matthews, and D.H. Saklofske, eds. Sage handbook of personality theory and testing: vol. 1: personality theories and models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 56-79.
26. Matthews, G., 2009. Cognitive processes and models. In: P.L. Corr, and G. Matthews, eds. Cambridge handbook of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 400-426.
27. Matthews, G. and Campbell, S.E., 2009. Sustained performance under overload: personality and individual differences in stress and coping. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 417-442.
28. Matthews, G., Deary, I.J., and Whiteman, M.C., 2009. Personality traits. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Matthews, G. and Desmond, A., 2002. Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 659-686.
30. Matthews, G. and Falconer, S., 2000. Individual differences in task-induced stress in customer service personnel. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44, 145-148.
31. Matthews, G. and Gilliland, K., 1999. The personality theories of H.J. Eysenck and J.A. Gray: a comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583-626.
32. Matthews, G., et al., 1997. A comprehensive questionnaire measure of driver stress and affect. In: E.C. Vaya, and J.A. Rothengatter, eds. Traffic and transport psychology: theory and application. Amsterdam: Pergamon, 317-324.
33. Matthews, G., et al., 1998. Driver stress and performance on a driving simulator. Human Factors, 40, 136-149.
34. Matthews, G., et al., 2002. Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress and worry. Emotion, 2, 315-340.
35. Matthews, G., et al., 2010a. Task engagement, cerebral blood flow velocity, and diagnostic monitoring for sustained attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 187-203.
36. Matthews, G., et al., 2010b. Task engagement, attention and executive control. In: A. Gruszka, G. Matthews, and B. Szymura, eds. Handbook of individual differences in cognition: attention, memory and executive control. New York: Springer, 205-230.
37. Matthews, G., et al., 2010c. A multivariate test battery for predicting vigilance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54, 1072-1076.
38. Matthews, G., et al., in press. Driving in states of fatigue or stress. In: D. Fisher, et al., eds. Handbook of driving simulation for engineering, medicine and psychology. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis.
39. Miyake, A., et al., 2000. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "frontal lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
40. Öz, B., Özkan, T., and Lajunen, T., 2010. Professional and non-professional drivers' stress reactions and risky driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 13, 32-40.
41. Ozer, D.J. and Benet-Martinez, V., 2006. Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421.
42. Peeters, M.A.G., et al., 2006. Personality and team performance: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality, 20, 377-396.
43. Reason, J.T., et al., 1990. Errors and violations on the roads. Ergonomics, 33, 1315-1332.
44. Reinerman, L.E., et al., 2007. Predicting cognitive vigilance performance from cerebral blood flow velocity and task engagement. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 51, 850-854.
45. Reinerman-Jones, L.E., et al., in press. Selection for vigilance assignments: a review and proposed new direction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, DOI: 10.1080/14639221003622620.
46. Rose, C.L., et al., 2002. The role of the Big Five personality factors in vigilance performance and workload. European Journal of Personality, 16, 185-200.
47. Sanders, A.F., 1991. The ergonomics society: the society's lecture 1990: simulation as a tool in the measurement of human performance. Ergonomics, 34, 995-1025.
48. Shaw, T.H., et al., 2010. Individual differences in vigilance: personality, ability and states of stress. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 297-308.
49. Squire, P., Trafton, G., and Parasuraman, R., 2006. Human control of multiple unmanned vehicles: effects of interface type on execution and task switching times. Available from: http://www.nrl.navy.mil/aic/iss/pubs/squire.hri06.pdf [Accessed 24 December 2009].
50. Stajkovic, A.D. and Luthans, F., 1998. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 240-261.
51. Szalma, J.L., 2009. Individual differences in human-technology interaction: incorporating variation in human characteristics into human factors and ergonomics research and design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 381-397.
52. Tett, R.P. and Christiansen, N.D., 2008. Personality assessment in organizations. In: G.J. Boyle, G. Matthews, and D.H. Saklofske, eds. Sage handbook of personality theory and testing: volume 1: personality theories and models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 720-742.
53. Warm, J.S., Matthews, G., and Parasuraman, R., 2009. Cerebral hemodynamics and vigilance performance. Military Psychology, 21, S75-S100.
54. Wickens, C.D. and Hollands, J.G., 1999. Engineering psychology and human performance. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
55. Wiener, E.L., 1975. Individual and group differences in inspection. In: C.G. Drury, and J.G. Fox, eds. Human reliability in quality control. London: Taylor and Francis, 10l-122.
56. Zeidner, M. and Matthews, G., 2005. Evaluation anxiety. In: A.J. Elliot, and C.S. Dweck, eds. Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford Press, 141-163.