Collaboration and framing as dimensions of design innovation

C and C 2009 - Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 285-294

  Svihla, Vanessa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Innovation; Learning

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA;

COLLABORATION; DESIGN ACTIVITY; DESIGN INNOVATIONS; ENGINEERING COURSE; INNOVATIVE DESIGN; INNOVATIVE IDEAS; LEARNING; PERSPECTIVE TAKING;

INNOVATION;

EID: 79960633504     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1640233.1640276     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Jonassen, D.H., Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2000. 48(4): p. 63-85.
2. Dorst, K., The Problem of Design Problems. Design Thinking Research Symposium, Sydney, 2003. 17(19.11).
3. Ball, L., J. Evans, and I. Dennis, Cognitive processes in engineering design: a longitudinal study. Ergonomics, 1994. 37(11): p. 1753-1786.
4. Atman, C.J., et al., A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies, 1999. 20(2): p. 131-152.
5. Bogusch, L.L., J. Turns, and C.J. Atman. Engineering design factors: how broadly do students define problems? in Frontiers in Education Conference. 2000. Kansas City, MO.
6. Cross, N., Design cognition: Results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. Chapter, 2004. 5: p. 79-103.
7. Ahmed, S., K.M. Wallace, and L.T. Blessing, Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks. Research in Engineering Design, 2003. 14(1): p. 1-11.
8. Harfield, S., On design 'problematization': Theorising differences in designed outcomes. Design Studies, 2007. 28(2): p. 159-173.
9. Sonnenwald, D.H., Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies, 1996. 17(3): p. 277-301.
10. Bucciarelli, L.L., Designing Engineers. 1994, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
11. Bucciarelli, L.L., Between thought and object in engineering design. Design Studies, 2002. 23(3): p. 219-231.
12. Newell, S., Collaborative Learning in Engineering Design. Journal of College Science Teaching, 1990. 19(6): p. 359-62.
13. Guzzo, R., Group decision making and group effectiveness in organizations, in Designing effective work groups, P.S. Goodman, Editor. 1986, Jossey- Bass: San Francisco, CA. p. 34-71.
14. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, E.A. Commission, Editor. 2007: Baltimore, MD. p. 21.
15. Dym, C.L., et al., Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p. 103-120.
16. Minneman, S., The Social Construction of a Technical Reality. 1991, Stanford University: Stanford, California.
17. Mercier, E., S. Goldman, and A. Booker, Focusing on Process: Educating Learning Technology Designers: Guiding and Inspiring Creators of Innovative Educational Tools, in Educating Learning Technology Designers, C. DiGiano, S. Goldman, and M. Chorost, Editors. 2008, Routledge: New Yourk, NY. p. 36-61.
18. Mercier, E., S.R. Goldman, and A. Booker. Collaborating to learn, learning to collaborate: finding the balance in a cross-disciplinary design course. in International Conference on Learning sciences. 2006. Bloomington, IN: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
19. Barron, B., et al., Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem-and Project-Based Learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1998. 7(3/4): p. 271-311.
20. Wasserman, S. and K. Faust, Social network analysis. 1995: Cambridge Univ. Press.
21. Dunn-Rankin, D., et al., Engineering Design in Industry: Teaching Student and Faculty to Apply Engineering Science in Design. Journal of Engineering Education, 1998. 87(3): p. 219-222.
22. Lloyd, P., Storytelling and the development of discourse in the engineering design process. Design Studies, 2000. 21(4): p. 357-373.
23. Schön, D.A., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. 1983, New York: Basic Books.
24. Searle, J., Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1980. 3: p. 417-457.
25. O'Connor, M.C., L. Godfrey, and R.P. Moses, The missing data point: Negotiating purposes in classroom mathematics and science. Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning, 1998: p. 89-125.
26. Stempfle, J. and P. Badke-Schaub, Thinking in design teams-an analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 2002. 23(5): p. 473-496.
27. Anning, A., Dilemmas and opportunities of a new curriculum: Design and technology with Young Children. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1994. 4(2): p. 155-177.