Focusing on process: Evidence and ideas to promote learning through the collaborative design process

Educating Learning Technology Designers: Guiding and Inspiring Creators of Innovative Educational Tools

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 36-61

  Mercier, Emma ^a   Goldman, Shelley ^b   Booker, Angela ^c  

^a Science of Learning Center   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 81455144354     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203357217     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. Azmitia , M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one? Child Development, 59(1), 87-96.
2. Azmitia , M. , & Hesser , J. (1993). Why siblings are important agents of cognitive development: a comparison of siblings and peers. Child Development, 64(2), 430-444.
3. Barron , B. (2000). Problem solving in video-based microworlds: Collaborative and individual outcomes of high-achieving sixth-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 391-398.
4. Barron , B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.
5. Bennis , W. , & Biedermanm P. W. (1997). Organizing genius. Cambridge, MA: Persus Books.
6. Bransford , J. D. , Brown , A. L. , & Cocking , R. R. , (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Davenport , P. , & Howe , C. (1999). Conceptual gain and successful problem-solving in primary school mathematics. Educational Studies, 25(1), 55-78.
8. Edmondson , A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. The Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419.
9. Goldman , S. (1996). Mediating microworlds: Collaboration on high school science activities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Grant , H. , & Dweck , C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541-553.
11. Gruen , D. (2000). Beyond scenarios: The role of storytelling in CSCW Design. CUE Technical Report #00-02. IBM Watson Research Center.
12. Hackman , J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don't): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Hogan , K. , Nastasi , B. K. , & Pressley , M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379-432.
14. Homans , G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597-606.
15. Johnson , D. W. , Johnson , R. T. , & Smith , K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26-35.
16. Karoly , L. A. , & Panis , C. W. A. (2004). The 21st century at work: Forces shaping the future workforce and workplace in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Labor and Population.
17. Lewin , K. (Ed.). (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Oxford: Harpers.
18. Margrett , J. A. , & Marsiske , M. (2002). Gender differences in older adults' everyday cognitive collaboration. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(1), 45-59.
19. Marra , R. M. , Palmer , B. , & Litzinger , T. A. (2000). The effects of a first-year engineering design course on student intellectual development as measured by the Perry scheme. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(1), 39-100.
20. Miell , D. , & MacDonald , R. (2000). Children's creative collaborations: The importance of friendship when working together on a musical composition. Social Development, 9(3), 348-369.
21. National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies. Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.
22. National Science Foundation. (1996). Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering and technology No. 96-139). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
23. Newell , A. , & Simon , H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Oxford: Prentice-Hall.
24. Roschelle , J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235-276.
25. Roschelle , J. , Kaput , J. , & Stroup , W. (in press). SimCalc: Accelerating student engagement with the mathematics of change. In M. J. Jacobsen & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Learning the sciences of the 21st century: Research, design, and implementing advanced technology learning environments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. SCANS. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS Report for America 2000. Washington, DC: The Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills, U.S. Department of Labor.
27. Seymour , E. , & Hewitt , N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
28. Springer , L. , Donovan , S. S. , & Stanne , M. E. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21-51.
29. Thibaut , J. , Strickland , L. H. , Mundy , D. , & Goding , E. F. (1960). Communication, task demands, and group effectiveness. Journal of Personality, 28, 156-166.
30. Webb , N. M. , & Farivar , S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 369-395.