Content and formal cognitive operations in construing meaning

Italian Journal of Linguistics

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 293-320

  De Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J Ruiz ^a   Sáenz, Francisco Santibáñez ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LA RIOJA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960625001     PISSN: 11202726     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BARCELONA Antonio, ed. (2000), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A cognitive perspective, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter.
2. BLAKEMORE Diane (1992), Understanding Utterances, Oxford, Blackwell.
3. BROWN Penelope & Stephen C. LEVINSON (1987), Politeness: Some universals in language use, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
4. CARSTON Robyn (1997), "Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed?", Linguistische Berichte 8: 103- 127.
5. CARSTON Robyn (2000), "Explicature and semantics", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 1-44.
6. FAUCONNIER Gilles (1985), Mental Spaces. Aspects of meaning construction in natural language, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
7. FAUCONNIER Gilles & Mark TURNER (1996), "Blending as a central process of grammar", in Adele GOLDBERG (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Stanford, CA, CSLI Publications, 113-130.
8. FAUCONNIER Gilles & Mark TURNER (1998), "Conceptual integration networks", Cognitive Science 22: 133-187.
9. FAUCONNIER Gilles & Mark TURNER (2002), The Way We Think. Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities, New York, Basic Books.
10. FORNÉS Mercedes & Francisco J. RUIZ DE MENDOZA (1997), "Esquemas de imágenes y construcción del espacio", RILCE 14: 23-43.
11. GRADY Joseph (1999), "A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor. Correlation vs. resemblance", in Raymond W. GIBBS & Gerard T. STEEN (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 79-100.
12. KÖVECSES Zoltán & Günter RADDEN (1998), "Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view", Cognitive Linguistics 9: 37-77.
13. LAKOFF George (1987), Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What categories reveal about the mind, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
14. LAKOFF George (1993), "The contemporary theory of metaphor", in Andrew ORTONY (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 202-251.
15. LAKOFF George (1996), "Sorry, I'm not myself today: the metaphor system for conceptualizing the Self", in Gilles FAUCONNIER & Eve SWEETSER (eds.), Spaces,Worlds, and Grammar, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 91- 123.
16. LAKOFF George & Mark JOHNSON (1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
17. LAKOFF George & Mark JOHNSON (1999), Philosophy in the Flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought, New York, Basic Books.
18. LANGACKER Ronald W. (1987), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, I: Theoretical prerequisites, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.
19. LANGACKER Ronald W. (1993), "Reference-point constructions", Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1-38.
20. MARMARIDOU Sophia S.A. (2000), Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
21. PANTHER Klaus-Uwe & Linda THORNBURG (1998), "A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation", Journal of Pragmatics 30: 755-769.
22. PANTHER Klaus-Uwe & Linda THORNBURG, eds. (2003), Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing, Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
23. PAPAFRAGOU Anna (1995), "Metonymy and relevance", UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 7, Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London.
24. PEÑA Sandra (2003), Topology and Cognition. What image-schemas reveal about the metaphorical language of emotions, Munich, LINCOM Europa.
25. PÉREZ Lorena & Francisco J. RUIZ DE MENDOZA (2002), "Grounding, semantic motivation, and conceptual interaction in indirect directive speech acts", Journal of Pragmatics 34: 259-284.
26. RÉCANATI François (1989), "The pragmatics of what is said", Mind and Language 4: 294-328.
27. RUIZ DE MENDOZA Francisco J. (1996), "Blended spaces and the pragmatic approach to cognition", in Beatriz PENAS (ed.), The Intertextual Dimension of Discourse, Zaragoza, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Zaragoza, 233-244.
28. RUIZ DE MENDOZA Francisco J. (1998), "On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon", Journal of Pragmatics 30: 259-274.
29. RUIZ DE MENDOZA Francisco J. (2000), "The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy", in BARCELONA (2000: 109-132).
30. RUIZ DE MENDOZA Francisco J. (2002), "From semantic underdetermination, via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction", Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, An International Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies 1: 107-143.
31. RUIZ DE MENDOZA Francisco J. & Olga DÍEZ (2002), "Patterns of conceptual interaction", in Ralf PÖRINGS & René DIRVEN (eds.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 489-532.
32. RUIZ DE MENDOZA Francisco J. & Sandra PEÑA (2002) "Cognitive operations and projection spaces", Jezikoslovije 3: 131-158.
33. RUIZ DE MENDOZA Francisco J. & Lorena PÉREZ (2001), "Metonymy and the grammar: motivation, constraints and interaction", Language & Communication 21: 321-357.
34. RUIZ DE MENDOZA Francisco J. & Lorena PÉREZ (2003), "Cognitive operations and pragmatic implication", in PANTHER & THORNBURG (2003: 23-49).
35. SPERBER Dan & Deirdre WILSON, (1986) [1995]2, Relevance. Communication and Cognition, Oxford, Blackwell.
36. TALMY Leonard (1988), "Force dynamics in language and cognition", Cognitive Science 12: 49-100.
37. THORNBURG Linda & Klaus-Uwe PANTHER (1997), "Speech act metonymies", in Wolf-Andreas LIEBERT, Gisela REDEKER & Linda WAUGH (eds.), Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 205-219.
38. TURNER Mark & Gilles FAUCONNIER (1995), "Conceptual integration and formal expression", Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 10: 183-204.
39. TURNER Mark & Gilles FAUCONNIER (2000), "Metaphor, metonymy and binding", Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads, in BARCELONA (2000: 133-145).