Metonymy and the grammar: Motivation, constraints and interaction

Language and Communication

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 321-357

  Ruiz De Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José ^a   Hernández, Lorena Pérez ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LA RIOJA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18044400380     PISSN: 02715309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0271-5309(01)00008-8     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barcelona, A., 2000. On plausibility of claiming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In: Barcelona, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York, pp. 31-59.
2. Bybee, J., Perkins, R., Pagliuca, W., 1994. The Evolution and the Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. Croft, W., 1993. The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4 (4), 335-370.
4. Dik, S.C., 1986. On the notion 'functional explanation'. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 1, 11-52.
5. Dik, S.C., 1989. The Theory of Functional Grammar, Vol.1: The Structure of the Clause. Foris, Dordrecht.
6. Dik, S.C., 1997. The theory of functional grammar, Vol. 2. Hengeveld, K. Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
7. Dirven, R., 1993. Metonymy and metaphor: different mental strategies of conceptualisation. Leuvense Bijdragen 82, 1-25.
8. Fauconnier, G., 1985. Mental Spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Gibbs, R., 1994. The Poetics of Mind. Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10. Givón, T., 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction (2 vols.). John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
11. Givón, T., 1993. English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction (2 vols.). John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
12. Givón, T., 1995. Functionalism and Grammar. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
13. Goldberg, A.E., 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
14. Goossens, L., 1990. Metaphtonymy: the interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1 (3), 323-340.
15. Goossens, L., 1999. Metonymic bridges in modal shifts. In: Panther, K-U., Radden, G. (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 193-211.
16. Halliday, M.A.K., 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd. Edition. Edward Arnold, London.
17. Heine, B., 1995. Agent-oriented vs. epistemic modality: some observations on German modals. In: Bybee, J., Fleischman, S. (Eds.), Modality and Grammar in Discourse. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 17-53.
18. Jackendoff, R., 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Kay, P., Fillmore, C.J., 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What's X doing Y construction? Language 75 (1), 1-33.
20. Kövecses, Z., Radden, G., 1998. Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1), 37-77.
21. Lakoff, G., Turner, M., 1989. More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
22. Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
23. Lakoff, G., 1990. The invariance hypothesis: is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1), 39-74.
24. Langacker, R.W., 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
25. Nunberg, G., 1995. Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics 12, 109-132.
26. Panther, K-U., Radden, G., 1999. Metonymy in Language and Thought. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
27. Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L., 1998. A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 30, 755-769.
28. Panther, K-U., Thornburg, L., 1999. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. In: Panther, K-U., Radden, G. (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 333-357.
29. Panther, K.-U., Thornburg, L., 2000. The EFFECT FOR CAUSE metonymy in English grammar. In: Barcelona, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. A Cognitive Perspective. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 215-232.
30. Radden, G., 2000. How metonymic are metaphors?. In: Barcelona, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 93-108.
31. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J., 1997. Cognitive and pragmatic aspects of metonymy. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 6 (2), 161-178.
32. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., 1999a. From semantic underdetermination via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction. Linguistic LAUD Agency. University of Essen. Series A. General and Theoretical Papers. Paper No. 492.
33. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J., 1999b. Introducción a la Teoría Cognitiva de la Metonimia. Granada: Método. Serie Granada Lingüística.
34. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F.J. 2000. The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In: Barcelona, A. (Ed.). Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 109-132.
35. Stirling, L., 1996. Metonymy and anaphora. In: Mulder, W. & Tasmowski, L. (Eds). Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10 (Coherence & Anaphora). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 69-88.
36. Taylor, J.R., 1989. Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Clarendon, Oxford.
37. Thornburg, L., Panther, K.-U., 1997. Speech act metonymies. In: Liebert, W., Redeker, G., Waugh, L. (Eds.), Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 205-219.
38. Traugott, E.C., König, E., 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In: Traugott, E.C., Heine, B. (Eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Volume 1. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 189-218.
39. Turner, M., Fauconnier, G., 2000. Metaphor, metonymy, and binding. In: Barcelona, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 133-148.
40. Waltereit, R., 1999. Grammatical constraints on metonymy: on the role of the direct object. In: Panther, K-U., Radden, G. (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 233-255.