Importance of manual validation for the identification of phosphopeptides using a linear ion trap mass spectrometer

Journal of Biomolecular Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 10-20

  Goldstrohm, David A ^a   Broeckling, Corey D ^b   Prenni, Jessica E ^a,b   Curthoys, Norman P ^a  

^a Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology ^*  (United States)

^b Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

DIMAC enrichment; Kidney proximal tubule; LC MS n; Phosphoproteomics; Wistar rat kidney proximal tubule cells

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMATOGRAPHY; DATA BASE; ENRICHMENT CULTURE; IMMOBILIZED METAL AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; ION TRAP MASS SPECTROMETRY; KIDNEY PROXIMAL TUBULE; KIDNEY TUBULE CELL; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; RAT; TITANIUM DIOXIDE CHROMATOGRAPHY; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORKFLOW; AFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY; ANIMAL; CELL CULTURE; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; MASS FRAGMENTOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PHOSPHORYLATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY; WISTAR RAT;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMATOGRAPHY, AFFINITY; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY-MASS SPECTROMETRY; KIDNEY TUBULES, PROXIMAL; PHOSPHOPEPTIDES; PHOSPHORYLATION; RATS; RATS, WISTAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TITANIUM;

EID: 79960618611     PISSN: 15240215     EISSN: 19434731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Graves JD, Krebs EG. Protein phosphorylation and signal transduction. Pharmacol Ther 1999;82:111-121.
2. Hunter T. Signaling-2000 and beyond. Cell 2000;100:113-127.
3. Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 2002;298:1912-1934.
4. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 2001;291:1304-1351.
5. Mann M, Ong SE, Gronborg M, Steen H, Jensen ON, Pandey A. Analysis of protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry: deciphering the phosphoproteome. Trends Biotechnol 2002;20: 261-268.
6. Dunn JD, Reid GE, Bruening ML. Techniques for phosphopeptide enrichment prior to analysis by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev 2009;29:29-54.
7. Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Larsen MR. Analytical strategies for phosphoproteomics. Proteomics 2009;9:1451-1468.
8. Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D, et al. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:2130-2135.
9. Aebersold R, Goodlett DR. Mass spectrometry in proteomics. Chem Rev 2001;101:269-295.
10. Simpson RJ. Proteins and Proteomics: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2003.
11. Craig AG, Hoeger CA, Miller CL, Goedken T, Rivier JE, Fischer WH. Monitoring protein kinase and phosphatase reactions with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry and capillary zone electrophoresis: comparison of the detection efficiency of peptide-phosphopeptide mixtures. Biol Mass Spectrom 1994;23:519-528.
12. Liao PC, Leykam J, Andrews PC, Gage DA, Allison J. An approach to locate phosphorylation sites in a phosphoprotein: mass mapping by combining specific enzymatic degradation with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem 1994;219:9-20.
13. Nuhse TS, Bottrill AR, Jones AM, Peck SC. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of plasma membrane proteins reveals regulatory mechanisms of plant innate immune responses. Plant J 2007;51:931-940.
14. Michel HP. Identification of the phosphorylation site of an 8.3 kDa protein from photosystem II of spinach. FEBS Lett 1987; 212:103-108.
15. Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S, et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005;4:310-327.
16. Figeys D, Gygi SP, McKinnon G, Aebersold R. An integrated microfluidics-tandem mass spectrometry system for automated protein analysis. Anal Chem 1998;70:3728-3734.
17. Li S, Dass C. Iron(III)-immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry for the purification and characterization of synthetic phosphopeptides. Anal Biochem 1999;270: 9-14.
18. Nuhse TS, Stensballe A, Jensen ON, Peck SC. Large-scale analysis of in vivo phosphorylated membrane proteins by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 2003;2:1234-1243.
19. Posewitz MC, Tempst P. Immobilized gallium(III) affinity chromatography of phosphopeptides. Anal Chem 1999;71:2883-2892.
20. Jensen SS, Larsen MR. Evaluation of the impact of some experimental procedures on different phosphopeptide enrichment techniques. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2007;21:3635-3645.
21. Sugiyama N, Masuda T, Shinoda K, Nakamura A, Tomita M, Ishihama Y. Phosphopeptide enrichment by aliphatic hydroxyl acid-modified metal oxide chromatography for nano-LCMS/MS in proteomics applications. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007;6: 1103-1109.
22. Yu L-R, Issaq HJ, Veenstra TD. Phosphoproteomics for the discovery of kinases as cancer biomarkers and drug targets. Proteomics Clin Appl 2007;1:1042-1057.
23. Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Robinson PJ, Larsen MR. SIMAC (sequential elution from IMAC), a phosphoproteomics strategy for the rapid separation of monophosphorylated from multiply phosphorylated peptides. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008;7:661-671.
24. Woost PG, Orosz DE, Jin W, et al. Immortalization and characterization of proximal tubule cells derived from kidneys of spon-taneously hypertensive and normotensive rats. Kidney Int 1996; 50:125-134.
25. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976;72:248-254.
26. Villen J, Gygi SP. The SCX/IMAC enrichment approach for global phosphorylation analysis by mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc 2008;3:1630-1638.
27. Lee J, Xu Y, Chen Y, et al. Mitochondrial phosphoproteome revealed by an improved IMAC method and MS/MS/MS. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007;6:669-676.
28. Elias JE, Gygi SP. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 2007;4:207-214.
29. Jorge I, Casas EM, Villar M, et al. High-sensitivity analysis of specific peptides in complex samples by selected MS/MS ion monitoring and linear ion trap mass spectrometry: application to biological studies. J Mass Spectrom 2007;42:1391-1403.
30. Black TM, Andrews CL, Kilili G, Ivan M, Tsichlis PN, Vouros P. Characterization of phosphorylation sites on Tpl2 using IMAC enrichment and a linear ion trap mass spectrometer. J Proteome Res 2007;6:2269-2276.
31. Domon B, Bodenmiller B, Carapito C, Hao Z, Huehmer A, Aebersold R. Electron transfer dissociation in conjunction with collision activation to investigate the Drosophila melanogaster phosphoproteome. J Proteome Res 2009;8:2633-2639.
32. Han G, Ye M, Zhou H, et al. Large-scale phosphoproteome analysis of human liver tissue by enrichment and fractionation of phosphopeptides with strong anion exchange chromatography. Proteomics 2008;8:1346-1361.
33. Carrascal M, Gay M, Ovelleiro D, Casas V, Gelpi E, Abian, J. Characterization of the human plasma phosphoproteome using linear ion trap mass spectrometry and multiple search engines. J Proteome Res 2010;9:876-884.
34. Hoffert JD, Pisitkun T, Wang G, Shen RF, Knepper MA. Quantitative phosphoproteomics of vasopressin-sensitive renal cells: regulation of aquaporin-2 phosphorylation at two sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:7159-7164.
35. Zhai B, Villen J, Beausoleil SA, Mintseris J, Gygi SP. Phosphoproteome analysis of Drosophila melanogaster embryos. J Proteome Res 2008;7:1675-1682.
36. Bakalarski CE, Haas W, Dephoure NE, Gygi SP. The effects of mass accuracy, data acquisition speed, and search algorithm choice on peptide identification rates in phosphoproteomics. Anal Bioanal Chem 2007;389:1409-1419.
37. Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT, et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Biotechnol 2002;20:301-305.