Air traffic controllers' performance in advance air traffic management system: Part I-performance results

International Journal of Aviation Psychology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 283-305

  Jha, Pratik D ^a,b   Bisantz, Ann M ^a,b   Parasuraman, Raja ^c   Drury, Colin G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960615604     PISSN: 10508414     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508414.2011.582456     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andrews, J.W., & Hollister, W. M. (1997). Impact of intent based maneuver constraints on alert rates. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 5(3), 157-179.
2. Beers, C., & Huisman, H. (2001, December 3-7). Transition between free flight and managed airspace: A controller's perspective. Paper presented at the 4th International Air Traffic Management R&D seminar, FAA/Euriocontrol ATM 2001 Seminar, Santa Fe, NM.
3. Bolic, T., & Hansen, M. (2005, July). User request evaluation tool (URET) adoption and adaptation, three center case study. Paper presented at the 6th ATM R&D Seminar, Baltimore, MD.
4. Brudnicki, D., & McFarland, A. (1997). User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) conflict probe performance and benefits assessment (Tech. Rep.). McLean, VA: MITRE.
5. Castano, D., & Parasuraman, R. (1999). Manipulation of pilot intent under free flight: A prelude to not-so-free flight. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 170-176). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
6. Corker, K. (2004, June). User request evaluation tool: Implementation and fielding lessons learned. Presentation at FAA/NASA IAIPT J12 Human Factors TIM, Atlantic City, NJ.
7. Corker, K., Fleming, K., & Lane, J. (1999). Measuring controller reactions to free flight in a complex transition sector. Journal of ATC, 4, 9-16.
8. Dekker, S. W. A., & Woods, D. D. (1999). To intervene or not to intervene: The dilemma of management by exception. Cognition, Technology & Work, 1, 86-96.
9. Duley, J., Galster, S., Masalonis, J., Hilburn, B., & Parasuraman, R. (1997, October). En route controller information requirements from current ATM to free flight. Paper presented at the 10th CEAS Conference on Free Flight, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
10. Endsley, M., Mogford, R., Allendoerfer, K., Snyder, M., & Stein, E. (1997). Effects of free flight condition on controller performance, workload and situation awareness (Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/CT-TN97/12). Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center.
11. Erzberger, H. (2001). The automated airspace concept. In Proceedings of 4th USA/Europe ATM R&D Seminar. Santa Fe, NM.
12. Farley, T. C., Hansman, R. J., Amonlirdviman, K., & Endsley, M. (2000). Shared information between pilots and controllers in tactical air traffic control. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 23, 826-836.
13. Galster, S., Duley, J., Masalonis, A., & Parasuraman, R. (2001). Air traffic controller performance and workload under mature free flight: Conflict detection and resolution of aircraft self-separation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 71-93.
14. Jha, P., Bisantz, A., Parasuraman, R., & Drury, C. (2009). Air traffic controllers performance in advanced air traffic management concepts: Part II. Workload and trust. Journal of Air Traffic Control, 51(2), 46-52.
15. Joint Planning and Development Office. (2007). Concept of operations for Next Generation Air Transportation System, version 1.2. Retrieved from www.jpdo.aero
16. Kirk, D. B., Heagy, W. S., & Yablonski, M. J. (2001). Problem resolution support for free flight operations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2(2), 72-80.
17. Krozel, J., & Peters, M. (1997). Conflict detection and resolution in free flight. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 5(3), 181-212.
18. Lozito, S., McGann, A., & Corker, K. (1991). Data link air traffic control and flight deck environments: Experiments in flight crew performance. In R. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 1009-1015). Columbus: The Ohio State University.
19. Mackintosh, M., Dunbar, M., Lozito, S., Cashion, P., Mcgann, A., & Dulchinos, V. (1998). Self separation from air and ground perspective. In Proceedings of 2nd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R& D Seminar, Orlando, FL.
20. Masalonis, A. J., Le, M. A., Klinge, J. C., Galster, S. M., Duley, J. A., Hancock, P.A., Parasuraman, R. (1997). Air traffic control workstation mock-up for free flight experimentation: Lab development and capabilities. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st annual meeting.
21. Metzger, U., Galster, S., & Parasuraman, R. (1999). Effects of a conflict detection aid and traffic density on controller mental workload and performance in an ATC task simulating free flight. In Proceedings of 10th International Symposium of Aviation Psychology.
22. Metzger, U., & Parasuraman, R. (2001). The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: An empirical study of active vs. passive monitoring. Human Factors, 43, 519-528.
23. Metzger, U., Rovira, E., & Parasuraman, R. (2003). Controller performance, workload and attention allocation in distributed air ground traffic management: Effects of mixed equipage and decision support. In Proceedings of 11th International Symposium of Aviation Psychology (pp. 541-547). Columbus, OH.
24. NASA. (1999). Distributed air/ground traffic management (DAG-TM) concept definition, version 1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
25. Parasuraman, R., & Hancock, P. A. (2001). Adaptive control of workload. In P. A. Hancock & P. E. Desmond (Eds.), Stress, workload, and fatigue (pp. 305-320). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Parasuraman, R., Hilburn, B., & Hoekstra, J. (2001). Free flight. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors (pp. 1005-1008). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
27. Pritchett, A., & Hansman, J. (1997). Pilot nonconformance to alerting system command. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH.
28. Rovira, E. (2006). Human performance and workload in future air traffic management: Decision support tools for controller. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,Catholic University of America, Washington, DC.
29. RTCA. (1995). Report of the RTCA Board of Directors select committee on free flight. Washington, DC: Author.
30. Sheridan, T., Corker, K., & Nadler, E. (2006). Final report and recommendations for research on human automation interaction in the next generation air transportation system (Department of Transportation Tech. Rep. No. DOT-VNTSC-NASA-06-05). Cambridge, MA: U.S. Department of Transportation, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
31. Sperandio, J. C. (1978). The regulations of working methods as a function of work load among air traffic controllers. Ergonomics, 21, 195-202.
32. Westrenen, F., and Groeneweg, J. (2003). Cooperative conflict resolution: An experimental validation of aircraft self separation in a classroom environment. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13, 233-248.
33. Wickens, C., Mavor, A., Parasuraman, R., & McGee, J. (1998). The future of air traffic control: Human operators and automation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
34. Willems, B., & Truitt, T. (1999). Implications of reduced involvement in en route air traffic control (FAA Tech. Rep. No. DOT/FAA/CT-TN99/22). Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration.
35. Winograd, T. (1989). Debate: On the cruelty of teaching computer science (a response to Dijkstra). Communications of the ACM, 32, 1412-1413.
36. Woods, D., & Roth, E. (1988). Aiding human performance II: From cognitive analysis to support systems. Le Travail Human, 51, 139-172.