Dimensionality Reduction Aids Term Co-Occurrence Based Multi-Document Summarization

COLING ACL 2006 - Task-Focused Summarization and Question Answering, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-7

  Hachey, Ben ^a   Murray, Gabriel ^a   Reitter, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

COOCCURRENCE MATRIXES (COM); DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; EXTRACTION SYSTEMS; MULTI DOCUMENTS SUMMARIZATION; PERFORMANCE; RELEVANCE AND REDUNDANCIES; TERM CO-OCCURRENCE;

SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

EID: 79960603006     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Enrique Amigo, Julio Gonzalo, Victor Peinado, Anselmo Penas, and Felisa Verdejo. 2004. An empirical study of information synthesis tasks. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Barcelona, Spain.
2. Regina Barzilay and Mirella Lapata. 2005. Modeling local coherence: an entity-based approach. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
3. Romaric Besançon, Martin Rajman, and Jean-Cédric Chappelier. 1999. Textual similarities based on a distributional approach. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Database And Expert Systems Applications, Firenze, Italy.
4. Jaime G. Carbonell and Jade Goldstein. 1998. The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Melbourne, Australia.
5. James R. Curran and Stephen Clark. 2003. Language independent NER using a maximum entropy tagger. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Edmonton, Canada.
6. Hoa T. Dang. 2005. Overview of DUC 2005. In Proceedings of the Document Understanding Conference, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
7. Janez Demšar. 2006. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1-30, Jan.
8. Peter W. Foltz, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas K. Landauer. 1998. The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25.
9. Milton Friedman. 1940. A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem of m rankings. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11:86-92.
10. Yihon Gong and Xin Liu. 2001. Generic text summarization using relevance measure and latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, New Orleans, LA, USA.
11. Claire Grover, Colin Matheson, Andrei Mikheev, and Marc Moens. 2000. LT TTT-a flexible tokenisation tool. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Athens, Greece.
12. Ben Hachey and Claire Grover. 2004. A rhetorical status classifier for legal text summarisation. In Proceedings of the ACL-2004 Text Summarization Branches Out Workshop, Barcelona, Spain.
13. Jagadeesh Jagarlamudi, Prasad Pingali, and Vasudeva Varma. 2005. A relevance-based language modeling approach to DUC 2005. In Proceedings of the Document Understanding Conference, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
14. Thomas K. Landauer, Peter W. Foltz, and Darrell La-ham. 1998. Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25.
15. Chin-Yew Lin and Eduard H. Hovy. 2003. Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Proceedings of the Joint Human Language Technology Conference and North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
16. Irina Matveeva, Gina-Anne Levow, Ayman Farahat, and Christiaan Royer. 2005. Term represetation with generalized latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Borovets, Bulgaria.
17. Andrei Mikheev. 1997. Automatic rule induction for unknown word guessing. Computational Linguistics, 23(3).
18. Guido Minnen, John Carroll, and Darren Pearce. 2000. Robust, applied morphological generation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Natural Language Generation Conference, Mitzpe Ramon, Israel.
19. Gabriel Murray, Steve Renals, and Jean Carletta. 2005a. Extractive summarization of meeting recordings. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Lisbon, Portugal.
20. Gabriel Murray, Steve Renals, Jean Carletta, and Johanna Moore. 2005b. Evaluating automatic summaries of meeting recordings. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
21. Gabriel Murray, Steve Renals, Jean Carletta, and Johanna Moore. 2006. Incorporating speaker and discourse features into speech summarization. In Proceedings of the Joint Human Language Technology Conference and North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Annual Meeting, New York City, NY, USA.
22. Ted Pedersen, Amruta Purandare, and Anagha Kulkarni. 2005. Name discrimination by clustering similar contexts. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, Mexico City, Mexico.
23. Douglas L. T. Rohde, Laur M. Gonnerman, and David C. Plaut. In prep. An improved method for deriving word meaning from lexical co-occurrence. http://dlt4.mit.edu/~dr/COALS/Coals.pdf (1 May 2006).
24. Josef Steinberger and Karel Ježek. 2004. Using latent semantic analysis in text summarization and summary evaluation. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Systems Implementation and Modelling, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
25. Henry Thompson, Richard Tobin, David McKelvie, and Chris Brew. 1997. LT XML: Software API and toolkit for XML processing. http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/software/.