Term representation with generalized latent semantic analysis

International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP

Volumn 2005-January, Issue , 2005, Pages 308-315

  Matveeva, Irina ^a   Levow, Gina Anne ^a   Farahat, Ayman ^b   Royer, Christiaan ^b  

^a THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b PALO ALTO RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

CO-OCCURRENCE; DOCUMENT CLUSTERING; DOCUMENT INDEXING; DOCUMENT REPRESENTATION; DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL; DOCUMENT VECTORS; LARGE CORPORA; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; TERM REPRESENTATION;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 84962689231     PISSN: 13138502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. (Ando 00) Rie Kubota Ando. Latent semantic space: iterative scaling improves precision of inter document similarity measurement. In Proc. of the 23rd ACM SIGIR, pages 216-223, 2000.
2. (Bartell et al. 92) Brian T. Bartell, Garrison W. Cottrell, and Richard K. Belew. Latent semantic indexing is an optimal special case of multidimensional scaling. In Proc. of the 15th ACM SIGIR, pages 161-167. ACM Press, 1992.
3. (Bekkerman et al. 03) Ron Bekkerman, Ran El-Yaniv, and Naftali Tishby. Distributional word clusters vs. words for text categorization, 2003.
4. (Belkin & Niyogi 03) Mikhail Belkin and Partha Niyogi. Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Computation, 15(6):1373-1396, 2003.
5. (Berger & Lafferty 99) Adam Berger and John Lafferty. Information retrieval as statistical translation. In Proc. of the 22rd ACM SIGIR, 1999.
6. (Bientinesi et al. 03) Paolo Bientinesi, Inderjit S. Dhilon, and Robert A. van de Geijn. A parallel eigensolver for dense symmetric matrices based on multiple relatively robust representations. UT CS Technical Report TR-03-26, 2003.
7. (Blei et al. 02) David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. In Proc. of 14th NIPS, New York, 2002. ACM.
8. (Callan et al. 03) Jamie Callan, Gordon Cormack, Charles Clarke, David Hawking, and Alan Smeaton. Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization. In Proc. of the 26rd ACM SIGIR, New York, 2003. ACM.
9. (Chklovski & Pantel 04) Timothy Chklovski and Patrick Pantel. Verbocean: Mining the web for fine-grained semantic verb relations. In Proc. of EMNLP, 2004.
10. (Cox & Cox 01) Trevor F. Cox and Micheal A. Cox. Multidimensional Scaling. CRC/Chapman and Hall, 2001.
11. (Deerwester et al. 90) Scott C. Deerwester, Susan T. Dumais, Thomas K. Landauer, George W. Furnas, and Richard A. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(6):391-407, 1990.
12. (Golub & Reinsch 71) G. Golub and C. Reinsch. Handbook for Matrix Computation II, Linear Algebra. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.
13. (He et al. 04) Xiaofei He, Deng Cai, Haifeng Liu, and Wei-Ying Ma. Locality preserving indexing for document representation. In Proc. of the 27rd ACM SIGIR, pages 96-103. ACM Press, 2004.
14. (Hofmann 99) Thomas Hofmann. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1999.
15. (Landauer & Dumais 97) Thomas K. Landauer and Susan T. Dumais. A solution to platos problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 1997.
16. (Levow et al. 05) Gina-Anne Levow, Douglas W. Oard, and Philip Resnik. Dictionary-based techniques for cross-language information retrieval. Information Processing and Management: Special Issue on Cross-language Information Retrieval, 2005.
17. (Manning & Schütze 99) Chris Manning and Hinrich Schütze. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA, 1999.
18. (Pantel & Lin 02) Patrick Pantel and Dekang Lin. Document clustering with committees. In Proc. of the 25th ACM SIGIR, pages 199-206. ACM Press, 2002.
19. (Ponte & Croft 98) Jay M. Ponte and W. Bruce Croft. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In Proc. of the 21st ACM SIGIR, pages 275-281, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM Press.
20. (Sahlgren & Coester 04)Magnus Sahlgren and Rickard Coester. Using bag-of-concepts to improve the performance of support vector machines in text categorization. In Proc. of the 20th COLING, pages 487-493, 2004.
21. (Salton & McGill 83) Gerard Salton and Michael J. McGill. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill, 1983.
22. (Schölkopf et al. 98) Bernhard Schölkopf, Alex J. Smola, and Klaus-Robert Muller. Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Computation, 10, 1998.
23. (Schütze 98) Hinrich Schütze. Automatic word sense discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(21):97-124, 1998.
24. (Terra & Clarke 03) Egidio L. Terra and Charles L. A. Clarke. Frequency estimates for statistical word similarity measures. In Proc.of HLT-NAACL, 2003.
25. (Turney 01) Peter D. Turney. Mining the web for synonyms: PMI-IR versus LSA on TOEFL. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2167:491-502, 2001.
26. (Turney 04) Peter D. Turney. Human-level performance on word analogy questions by latent relational analysis. Technical report, Technical Report ERB-1118, NRC-47422, 2004.
27. (Widdows 03) DominicWiddows. Unsupervised methods for developing taxonomies by combining syntactic and statistical information. In Proc. of HLTNAACL, 2003.