Robust, applied morphological generation

INLG 2000 - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Natural Language Generation

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 201-208

  Minnen, Guido ^a   Carroll, John ^a   Pearce, Darren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINITE-STATE; MORPHOLOGICAL PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION SYSTEMS; PART OF SPEECH; PROTOTYPE SYSTEM; UNRESTRICTED TEXTS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85121244428     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Alfred Aho, Ravi Sethi, and Jeffrey Ullman. 1986 Compilers: Principles, Techniques and Tools. Addison-Wesley.
2. Hiyan Alshawi, editor. 1992. The Core Language Engine. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Harald Baayen, Richard Piepenbrock, and Hed-derik van Rijn. 1993. The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
4. John Bateman. 2000. KPML (Version 3.1) March 2000. University of Bremen, Germany, .
5. Lou Burnard. 1995. Users reference guide for the British National Corpus. Technical report, Oxford University Computing Services.
6. Lynne Cahill. 1993. Morphonology in the lexicon. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 87-96, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
7. Yvonne Canning and John Tait. 1999. Syntactic simplification of newspaper text for apha-sic readers. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR. Workshop on Customised Information Delivery, Berkeley, CA, USA.
8. John Carroll, Guido Minnen, Darren Pearcn, Yvonne Canning, Siobhan Devlin, and John Tait. 1999. Simplifying English text for language impaired readers. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), Bergen, Norway.
9. Hamish Cunningham, Yorick Wilks, and Robert Gaizauskas. 1996. GATE-a General Architecture for Text Engineering. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark.
10. Siobhan Devlin and John Tait. 1998. The use of a psycholinguistic database in the simplification of text for aphasic readers. In (Ner-bonne. 1998).
11. Michael Elhadad and Jacques Robin. 1996. An overview of SURGE:. A reusable comprehensive syntactic realization component. Technical Report 96-03, Dept of Mathematics and Computer Science, Ben Gurion University, Israel.
12. Roger Evans and Gerald Gazdar. 1996. DATR: a language for lexical knowledge representation. Computational Linguistics., 22.
13. Roger Garside, Geoffrey. Leech, and Geoffrey Sampson. 1987. The computational analysis of English: a corpus-based approach. Longman, London.
14. Lauri Karttunen, Jean-Pierre Chanod, Gregory Grefenstette, and Anne Schiller. 1996. Regular expressions for language engineering. Natural Language Engineering, 2 (4) :305-329.
15. Lauri Karttunen. 1994. Constructing lexical transducers. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 406-411, Kyoto, Japan.
16. Kimmo Koskenniemi. 1983. Two-level model for morphological analysis. In 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 683-685, Karlsruhe, Germany.
17. John Levine, Tony Mason, and Doug Brown. 1992. Lex & Yacc. O'Reilly and Associates, second edition.
18. Mitch Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Perm Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19 (2) :313-330.
19. Christian Matthiessen. 1984. Systemic Grammar in computation: The Nigel case. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 155-164, Pisa, Italy.
20. George Miller, Richard Beckwith, Christiane Fellbaum, Derek Gross, Katherine Miller, and Randee Tengi. 1993. Pivc Papers on Word-Net. Princeton University, Princeton. N. J.
21. Guido Minnen and John Carroll. Under review. Fast and robust, morphological processing tools for practical NLP applications.
22. Roger Mitton. 1992. A description of a computer-usable dictionary file based on the Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English. Available at .
23. Mehryar Mohri. 1996. On some applications of finite state automata theory to natural language processing. Natural Language Engineering, 2 (l) :61-80.
24. John Nerbonne, editor. 1998. Linguistic Databases. Lecture Notes. CSLI Publications, Stanford, USA.
25. Richard Power, Donia Scott, and Roger Evans. 1998. What You See Is What You Meant: di-. rect knowledge editing with natural-language feedback. In Proceedings of the 13th Biennial European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 98), Brighton, UK.
26. Paul Procter. 1995. Cambridge International Dictionary of English. Cambridge University Press.
27. Geoffrey Pullum and Arnold Zwicky. In preparation. Licensing of prosodic features by syntactic rules: the key to auxiliary reduction. First version presented to the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Chicago, Illinois, January 1997. Available at
28. Philip Quinlan. 1992. The Oxford Psycholin-guistic Database. Oxford University Press.
29. Graeme Ritchie, Graham Russell, Alan Black, and Stephen Pulman. 1992. Computational morphology; practical mechanisms for the English lexicon. MIT Press.
30. Geoffrey Sampson. 1995. English for the computer. Oxford University Press.
31. Stuart Shieber, Gertjan van Noord, Robert Moore, and Fernando Pereira. 1990. Semantic head-driven generation. Computational Linguistics, 16 (1) :7-17.
32. Lita Taylor and Gerry Knowles. 1988. Manual of information to accompany the SEC Corpus: the machine-readable corpus of spoken English. Manuscript, University of Lancaster. UK.
33. Gertjan van Noord. 1991. Morphology in MiMo2. Manuscript, University of Utrerht, The Netherlands.