ABRF-PRG07: Advanced quantitative proteomics study

Journal of Biomolecular Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 21-26

  Falick, Arnold M ^a   Lane, William S ^b   Lilley, Kathryn S ^c   Maccoss, Michael J ^d   Phinney, Brett S ^e   Sherman, Nicholas E ^f   Weintraub, Susan T ^g   Witkowska, H Ewa ^h   Yates, Nathan A ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^g Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ MERCK RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Association of biomolecular resource facilities study; Protein quantification; Protein quantitation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION OF BIOMOLECULAR RESOURCE FACILITIES PROTEOMICS RESEARCH GROUP STUDY; HUMAN; LABORATORY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; BACTERIUM; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BACTERIUM LYSATE; CELL EXTRACT; PROTEIN;

BACTERIA; CELL EXTRACTS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; LABORATORY PROFICIENCY TESTING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79960590601     PISSN: 15240215     EISSN: 19434731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Fievet J, Dillmann C, Lagniel D, et al. Assessing factors for reliable quantitative proteomics based on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2004;4:1939-1949.
2. Smejkal GB, Robinson MH, Lazarev A. Comparison of fluorescent stains: relative photostability and differential staining of proteins in two-dimensional gels. Electrophoresis 2004;25:2511-2519.
3. Yan JX, Devenish AT, Wait R, Stone T, Lewis S, Fowler S. Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry based proteomic analysis of Escherichia coli. Proteomics 2002;2:1682-1698.
4. Hu Y, Wang G, Chen GYJ, Fu X, Yao SQ. Proteome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under metal stress by two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 2003;24:1458-1470.
5. Gygi SP, Rist R, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotopecoded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 1999;17:994-999.
6. 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal Chem 2001;73:2836-2842.
7. Ross P, Huang YN, Marchese JN, et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004;3:1154-1169.
8. Everley PA, Krijgsveld J, Zetter BR, Gygi SP. Quantitative cancer proteomics: stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) as a tool for prostate cancer research. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004;3:729-735.
9. Old WM, Meyer-Arendt K, Aveline-Wolf L, et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005;4:1487-1502.
10. Zhang B, VerBerkmoes NC, Langston MA, Uberbacher E, Hettich RL, Samatova NF. Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res 2006;5:2909-2918.
11. Turck CW, Falick AM, Kowalak JA, et al. ABRF-PRG2006 study: relative protein quantitation. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007;6: 1291-1298.