Perception of phonetic detail in the identification of highly reduced words

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 319-329

  Niebuhr, Oliver ^a   Kohler, Klaus J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960578388     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Bochner J.H., Snell K.B., MacKenzie D.J. Duration discrimination of speech and tonal complex stimuli by normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 84:493-500.
2. Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 2001, 5:341-345.
3. Crystal D.H., House A.S. Segmental durations in connected-speech signals: Syllabic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1988, 83:1574-1585.
4. Ernestus, M. (2000). Voice assimilation and segmental reduction in Dutch. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
5. Ernestus M., Baayen H.R., Schreuder R. The recognition of reduced word forms. Brain and Language 2002, 81:162-173.
6. Firth J.R. Sounds and prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society 1948, 1948:127-152.
7. Gadet F. Le francais populaire 1992, PUF, Paris.
8. Gaskell G., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:144-158.
9. Gaskell G., Marslen-Wilson W.D. Lexical ambiguity resolution and spoken word recognition: Bridging the gap. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 44:325-349.
10. Gow D.W. Does English coronal place assimilation create lexical ambiguity?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 2002, 28:163-179.
11. Gimson A.C. An introduction to the pronunciation of English 1962, Edward Arnold, London, (8th ed. revised by A. Cruttenden (2008) Gimson's pronunciation of English. London: Hodder Education/Hachette Livre.).
12. Hawkins S. Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics 2003, 31:373-405.
13. Heid, S., & Hawkins, S. (2000). An acoustical study of long-domain /r/ and /l/ coarticulation. In Proceedings of the fifth international seminar on speech production: Models and data (pp. 77-80), Kloster Seeon, Germany.
14. Holst T., Nolan F. The influence of syntactic structure on [s] to [∫] assimilation. Papers in laboratory phonology, Vol. IV: Phonology and phonetic evidence 1996, 315-333. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Connell, A. Arvaniti (Eds.).
15. IPDS The Kiel Corpus of spontaneous speech, Vol. 1, CD-ROM#2 1995, IPDS, Kiel.
16. IPDS. The Kiel Corpus of spontaneous speech, Vol. 2, CD-ROM#3 1996, IPDS, Kiel.
17. Jones, D. (1997). In P. Roach, & J. Hartman (Eds.), English pronouncing dictionary (15th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kemps R., Ernestus M., Schreuder R., Baayen H.R. Processing reduced word forms: The suffix restoration effect. Brain and Language 2004, 90:117-127.
19. Kirchner, R. (1998). An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
20. Klatt D.H., Cooper W.E. Perception of segment duration in sentence contexts. Structure and process in speech perception 1975, 69-89. Springer, New York. A. Cohen, S.G. Nooteboom (Eds.).
21. Kleber, F. (2006). Form and function of falling pitch contours in English. In Proceedings of the third international conference of speech prosody (pp. 61-64), Dresden, Germany.
22. Kohler, K. J. (1987). Categorical pitch perception. In Proceedings of the 11th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 331-333). Tallinn, Estonia.
23. Kohler K.J. Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: Phonological facts and phonetic explanations. Speech production and speech modelling 1990, 69-92. Kluwer, Dordrecht. W. Hardcastle, A. Marchal (Eds.).
24. Kohler, K.J. (1994). Complementary phonology: a theoretical frame for labelling an acoustic data base of dialogues. In Proceedings of the ICSLP94 (Vol. 1, pp. 427-430), Yokohama.
25. Kohler K.J. Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen 1995, Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin. 2nd ed.
26. Kohler, K.J. (1999). Articulatory prosodies in German reduced speech. In Proceedings of the XIVth ICPhS (Vol. 1, pp. 89-92), San Francisco.
27. Kohler K.J. The disappearance of words in connected speech. ZAS Working Papers in Linguistics 1998, 11:21-34.
28. Kohler K.J. Articulatory dynamics of vowels and consonants in speech communication. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2001, 31:1-16.
29. Kohler K., Pätzold M., Simpson A. From scenario to segment. The controlled elicitation, transcription, segmentation and labelling of spontaneous speech 1995, Kiel, IPDS.
30. Krech, H., et al. (Eds.) (1969). Wörterbuch der Deutschen Aussprache. München: Max Hueber.
31. Ladd D.R. Intonational phonology 1996, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
32. Landau S., Everitt B. A handbook of statistical analysis using SPSS 2004, Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton.
33. Lehiste I. Suprasegmentals 1970, MIT Press, Cambridge.
34. Local J. Variable domains and variable relevance: Interpreting phonetic exponents. Journal of Phonetics 2003, 31:321-339.
35. Manuel S.Y. Recovery of "deleted" schwa. Perilus 1992, 14:115-118.
36. Mitterer H., Blomert L. Coping with phonological assimilation in speech perception: Evidence for early compensation. Perception and Psychophysics 2003, 65:956-969.
37. Mitterer H., Ernestus M. Listeners recover /t/s that speakers lenite: Evidence from /t/-elision in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 2006, 34:73-103.
38. Mitterer H., Yoneyama K., Ernestus M. How we hear what is hardly there: Mechanisms underlying compensation for /t/-reduction in speech comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:133-152.
39. Nash R., Mulac A. The intonation of verifiability. The melody of language: Intonation and prosody 1980, 219-241. University Park Press, Baltimore. L.R. Waugh, C.H. van Schooneveld (Eds.).
40. Niebuhr O. The signalling of German rising-falling intonation categories-The interplay of synchronization, shape, and height. Phonetica 2007, 64:174-193.
41. Niebuhr O. f0-based rhythm effects on the perception of local syllable prominence. Phonetica 2009, 66:95-113.
42. Niebuhr, O., Meunier, Ch., & Lancia, L. (2009). The role of the vowel context in the differentiation of French /sS/ and /Ss/ sequences. Talk given at the PaPI 2009 conference, Las Palmas, Spain http://www.ipds.uni-kiel.de/on/.
43. Nolan F. The descriptive role of segments: Evidence from assimilation. Papers in laboratory phonology 1992, Vol. 2:261-280. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
44. Pierrehumbert J.B., Steele S.A. Categories of tonal alignment in English. Phonetica 1989, 46:181-196.
45. Plug L. From words to actions: The phonetics of eigenlijk in two communicative contexts. Phonetica 2005, 62:131-145.
46. Simpson A.P. Phonetische Datenbanken des Deutschen in der empirischen Sprachforschung und der phonologischen Theoriebildung 1998, IPDS, Kiel.
47. Simpson A.P. Does articulatory reduction miss more patterns than it accounts for?. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2001, 31:29-39.
48. Snoeren N.D., Hallé P.A., Segui J. A voice for the voiceless: Production and perception of assimilated speech in French. Journal of Phonetics 2006, 34:241-268.
49. Weilhammer, K., & Rabold, S. (2003). Durational aspects in turn taking. In Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 931-934), Barcelona, Spain.
50. Wells J.C. Pronunciation dictionary 1990, Longman, London.