Form and function of falling pitch contours in english

Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Kleber, Felicitas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS;

DISCRIMINATION TASKS; GRADUAL CHANGES; PERCEPTION EXPERIMENT; PITCH-CONTOUR;

SPEECH;

EID: 85089845760     PISSN: 23332042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Beckman, M. E.; Ayers-Elam, G., 1997. Guidelines for ToBI labelling. URL: http://www. ling. ohio-state. edu/ research/phonetics/E-ToBI.
2. Boersma, P.; Weenik, D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. URL: http://www. fon. hum. uva. nl/praat/.
3. Chen, A., 2003. Reaction time as an indicator of discrete intonational contrasts in English. Proc. Eurospeech 2003, 97-100.
4. House, D. 1996. Differential perception of tonal contours through the syllable. Proc. ICSLP 2048-2051.
5. Kohler, K. J., 1987. Categorical pitch perception. Proc. 11th ICPhS, vol. 5, Tallinn. 331-333.
6. Kohler, K. J., 1991. Terminal intonation patterns in single-accent utterances in German: phonetics, phonology and semantics. AIPUK 25, 117-185.
7. Kohler, K. J., 1991. A model of German intonation. AIPUK 25, 295-360.
8. Ladd, D. R., 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Pierrehumbert, J. B., 1987. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD. Diss., MIT.
10. Pierrehumbert, J. B.; Steele, S. A., 1989. Categories of tonal alignment in English. Phonetica 46, 181-196.
11. Redi, L. C., 2003. Categorical effects in production of pitch contours in English. 15th ICPhS, Barcelona, Vol. 3, 2921-2924.
12. Repp, B. H., 1984. Categorical perception: Issues, methods, findings. In Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice, vol. 10, N. J. Lass (ed.). Orlando FL: Academic Press, 243-335.