The effect of different atrioventricular delays on left atrium and left atrial appendage function in patients with DDD pacemaker

Echocardiography

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 626-632

  Kanadaşi, Mehmet ^a   Çayli, Murat ^b   Şahin, Durmuş Yildiray ^b   Şen, Ömer ^a   Koç, Mevlüt ^b   Usal, Ayhan ^a   Batur, Mustafa Kemal ^c   Demirtaş, Mustafa ^a  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ADANA NUMUNE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^c ACIBADEM UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

atrioventricular delay; DDD pacemaker; diastolic dysfunction; left atrial appendage function; left atrial function

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; ATRIOVENTRICULAR DELAY; ATRIOVENTRICULAR SYNCHRONOUS PACING; CARDIAC IMAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC DYSFUNCTION; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM APPENDAGE; HEART ATRIUM FUNCTION; HEART FUNCTION; HEART PACING; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULSE WAVE; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

ATRIAL APPENDAGE; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CONDUCTION SYSTEM; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 79960576403     PISSN: 07422822     EISSN: 15408175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01404.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ertas F, Gulec S, Dincer I, et al,: Left atrial appendage function in patients with different pacing modes. Int J Cardiol 2000; 73: 135-141. (Pubitemid 30245999)
2. Rediker ED, Eagle KA, Homma S, et al,: Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 323-329.
3. Asanuma T, Tanabe K, Yoshitomi H, et al,: Left atrial appendage function in patients with single-chamber ventricular pacing. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 840-842.
4. Sparks PB, Mond HG, Vohra JK, et al,: Mechanical remodeling of the left atrium after loss of atrioventricular synchrony: A long-term Study in Humans. Circulation 1999; 100: 1714-1721. (Pubitemid 29485254)
5. Ritter P, Padeletti L, Gillio-Meina L, et al,: Determination of the optimal atrioventricular delay in DDD pacing. Europace 1999; 1: 126-130.
6. Porciani CM, Fantini F, Musilli N, et al,: A perspective on atrioventricular delay optimization in patients with a dual chamber pacemaker. PACE 2004; 27: 333-338. (Pubitemid 38352512)
7. Leonelli FM, Wang K, Youssef M, et al,: Systolic and diastolic effects of variable atrioventricular delay in patients with complete heart block and normal ventricular function. Am J Cardiol 1997; 80: 294-298. (Pubitemid 27330144)
8. Styliadis IH, Papadopoulos CE, Gouzoumas NI, et al,: Similar pattern of diastolic function adaptation of both ventricles to programmed atrioventricular interval modification in patients with DDD pacing. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 2006; 6: 243-247. (Pubitemid 44390482)
9. Modena MG, Rossi R, Carcagni A, et al,: The importance of different atrioventricular delay for left ventricular filling in sequential pacing: Clinical implications. PACE 1996; 19: 1595-1604. (Pubitemid 26398511)
10. Pai SM, Jacobson AK, Pai RG,. Effect of programmed atrioventricular delay on the patterns of mitral and pulmonary vein flow profiles and their durations in patients with dual-chamber pacemakers. Echocardiography 1999; 16: 231-238. (Pubitemid 29174202)
11. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, et al,: Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on standards, subcommittee on quantitation of two-dimensional echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989; 2: 358-367.
12. Osranek M, Fatema K, Qaddoura F, et al,: Left atrial volume predicts the risk of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. A prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 779-86. (Pubitemid 44175728)
13. Özer N, Can I, Atalar E, et al,: Left ventricular long-axis function is reduced in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Echocardiography 2004; 21: 107-112. (Pubitemid 38280956)
14. Garcia MJ, Thomas JD, Klein AL,. New doppler echocardiographic applications for the study of diastolic function. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 865-875. (Pubitemid 28459571)
15. Cayli M, Acarturk E, Demir M, et al,: Systolic tissue velocity is a useful echocardiographic parameter in assessment of left atrial appendage function in patients with mitral stenosis. Echocardiography 2007; 24: 816-822. (Pubitemid 47346732)
16. Strohmer B, Pichler M, Froemmel M, et al,: Evaluation of atrial conduction time at various sites of right atrial pacing and influence on atrioventricular delay optimization by surface electrocardiography. PACE 2004; 27: 468-474. (Pubitemid 38491395)
17. Frielingsdorf J, Deseo T, Gerber AE, et al,: A comparison of qualityoflife in patients with dual chamber pacemakers and individually programmed atrioventricular delays. PACE 1996; 19: 1147-1154. (Pubitemid 26321405)
18. Redfield MM,. Heart failure with normal ejection fraction. In, Libby P, Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Branunwald E, (eds.): Braunwald's heart disease: A textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Elselvier Publisher, 2008, p. 641.
19. Ishikawa T, Sumita S, Kosuge M, et al,: Optimization of atrioventricular delay and follow-up in a patient with congestive heart failure with an implanted DDD pacemaker. Jpn Circ J 2001; 65: 46-49.
20. Cayli M, Acarturk E, Kanadasi M, et al,: Annular systolic velocity predicts the presence of spontaneous echo contrast in mitral stenosis patients with sinus rhythm. Clin Cardiol 2007; 30: 459-463. (Pubitemid 47438714)
21. Parvathaneni L, Mahenthiran J, Jacob S, et al,: Comparison of tissue doppler dynamics to doppler flow in evaluating left atrial appendage function by transesophageal echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 1011-1014. (Pubitemid 40487763)
22. Sahin T, Ural D, Kilic T, et al,: Evaluation of left atrial appendage functions according to different etiologies of atrial fibrillation with a tissue Doppler imaging technique by using transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography 2009; 26: 171-181.
23. Tabata T, Oki T, Fukuda N, et al,: Influence of left atrial pressure on left atrial appendage flow velocity patterns in patients in sinus rhythm. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 9: 857-864.
24. Bilge M, Eryonucu B, Guler N, et al,: Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of left atrial appendage function in untreated systemic hypertensive patients with sinus rhythm. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000; 13: 271-276. (Pubitemid 30215251)
25. Hoit BD, Shao Y, Gabel M, Influence of acutely altered loading conditions on left atrial appendage flow velocity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 1117-1123. (Pubitemid 24306427)