Left atrial appendage function in patients with different pacing modes

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 135-141

  Ertaş, Fatih ^a   Güleç, Sadi ^a   Dinçer, Irem ^a   Erol, Çetin ^a   Tutar, Eralp ^a   Güldal, Muharrem ^a   Karaoguz, Remzi ^a   Oral, Derviş ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Left atrial appendage; Pacing mode; Transesophageal echocardiography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATRIOVENTRICULAR BLOCK; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT ATRIUM; HEART LEFT ATRIUM PRESSURE; HEART PACING; HEART VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HUMAN; MALE; PACEMAKER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SICK SINUS SYNDROME; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATRIAL FUNCTION, LEFT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIAC PACING, ARTIFICIAL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART BLOCK; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SICK SINUS SYNDROME; STROKE VOLUME; THROMBOEMBOLISM;

EID: 0343673866     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-5273(99)00221-1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Button R., Kenny R.A. The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. PACE. 116:1986;16-22.
2. Brown-Mahoney C. Patient outcomes and cost considerations. Comparing pacing modes via meta-analysis. Medtronic News. 22:1994;4-11.
3. Rosenqvist M., Brandt J., Schüller H. Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: Effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am Heart J. 116:1988;16-22.
4. Andersen H.R., Theusen L., Bagger J.P., Vesterlund T., Thomsen P.E. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick sinus syndrome. Lancet. 344:1994;1923-1928.
5. Andersen H.R., Nielsen J.C., Thomsen P.E., Thuesen L., Mortensen P.T., Vesterlund T., Pedersen A.K. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 350:1997;1210-1216.
6. Pollick C., Taylor D. Assessment of left atrial appendage function by transesophageal echocardiography: Implications for the development of thrombus. Circulation. 84:1991;223-231.
7. Jue J., Winslow T., Fazio G., Redberg R.F., Foster E., Schiller N.B. Pulsed Doppler characterization of left atrial appendage flow. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 71:1993;842-847.
8. Mügge A., Kühn H., Nikutta P., Grote J., Lopez J.A.G., Daniel W.G. Assessment of left atrial appendage function by biplane transesophageal echocardiography in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation: Identification of a subgroup of patients at increased embolic risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 23:1994;599-607.
9. Fatkin D., Kelly R.P., Feneley M.P. Relations between left atrial blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 23:1994;961-969.
10. Drefius L.S., Fisch C., Griffin C.J., Gillette P.C., Mason J.W., Parsonnet V. Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhytmia devices. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures (Committee on pacemaker implantation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 18:(1):1991;1-13.
11. Wirtzfeld A., Schmidt G., Himmler F.C., Stangl K. Physiological pacing: Present status and Future developments. PACE. 10:1987;41-57.
12. Baig M.W., Perrins E.J. The hemodynamics of cardiac pacing: Clinical and Physiological aspects. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases. 33:(5):1991;283-298.
13. Samet P., Castillo C., Bernstein W.H. Hemodynamic consequences of sequential atrioventricular pacing: Subjects with normal hearts. Am J Cardiol. 21:1968;207-212.
14. Kruse I.B., Arnman K., Conradson T.B., Rydén L. A comparison of the acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing. Circulation. 65:(5):1982;846-855.
15. Rediker E.D., Eagle K.A., Homma S., Gillam L.D., Harthorne J.W. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol. 61:1988;323-329.
16. Perrins E.J., Morley A.C., Chan L.S., Sutton R. Randomised controlled trial of physiological and ventricular pacing. Br Heart J. 50:1983;112-117.
17. Asanuma T., Tanabe K., Yoshitomi H., Shimizu H., Murakami Y., Sano K., et al. Left atrial appendage function in patients with single-chamber ventricular pacing. Am J Cardiol. 76:1995;840-842.
18. Tanabe K., Yoshitomi H., Asanuma T., Kobayashi K., Shimizu H., Sano K., et al. Left atrial appendage function in pacemaker patients [abstract]. Eur Heart J. 17:(Abstr. Suppl.):1996;439.
19. Simantirakis E.N., Parthenakis F.I., Chrysostomakis S.I., Zuridakis E.G., Igoumenidis N.E., Vardas P.E. Left atrial appendage function during DDD and VVI pacing. Heart. 77:1997;428-431.
20. Barold S.S., Santini M. Natural history of sick sinus syndrome after pacemaker implantation. Barold S.S., Mugica J. New perspective in cardiac pacing 3. 1993;169-211 Futura Publishing Co, Mt Kisco, NY.
21. Saksena S., Prakash A., Hill M., Krol R.B., Munsif A.N., Mathew P.P., et al. Prevention of recurrent atrial fibrillation with chronic dual-site right atrial pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 28:1996;687-694.