MRI of trabecular bone using a decay due to diffusion in the internal field contrast imaging sequence

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 361-371

  Mintzopoulos, Dionyssios ^a   Ackerman, Jerome L ^a   Song, Yi Qiao ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b SCHLUMBERGER DOLL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

DDIF; diffusion; imaging; MRI contrast; trabecular bone

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BODY TEMPERATURE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECAY DUE TO DIFFUSION IN THE INTERNAL FIELD; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTRON SPIN RESONANCE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VIVO STUDY; MUSCLE TISSUE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRABECULAR BONE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BODY TEMPERATURE; BONE AND BONES; CATTLE; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION; FRACTURE HEALING; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MODELS, ANIMAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SWINE;

EID: 79960570069     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22612     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Rousculp MD, Long SR, Wang S, Schoenfeld MJ, Meadows ES,. Economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in Medicaid. Value Health 2007; 10: 144-152. (Pubitemid 46481141)
2. Becker DJ, Kilgore ML, Morrisey MA,. The societal burden of osteoporosis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2010; 12: 186-191.
3. Roche JJ, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG,. Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ 2005; 331: 1374.
4. Bouxsein ML, Seeman E,. Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2009; 23: 741-753.
5. Genant HK, Cooper C, Poor G, et al. Interim report and recommendations of the World Health Organization Task-Force for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 1999; 10: 259-264. (Pubitemid 29476187)
6. Blake GM, Fogelman I,. An update on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Semin Nucl Med 2010; 40: 62-73.
7. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al. Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 1185-1194. (Pubitemid 40863806)
8. Parfitt AM, Mathews CH, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS,. Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J Clin Invest 1983; 72: 1396-1409. (Pubitemid 13013772)
9. Kleerekoper M, Villanueva AR, Stanciu J, Rao DS, Parfitt AM,. The role of three-dimensional trabecular microstructure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fractures. Calcif Tissue Int 1985; 37: 594-597. (Pubitemid 16197165)
10. Aaron JE, Johnson DR, Paxton S, Kanis JA,. Secondary osteoporosis and the microanatomy of trabecular bone. Clin Rheumatol 1989; 8 (Suppl 2): 84-88. (Pubitemid 20122986)
11. Melton LJ III, Riggs BL, Keaveny TM, et al. Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk. J Bone Miner Res 2007; 22: 1885-1892. (Pubitemid 351229305)
12. Oden ZM, Selvitelli DM, Hayes WC, Myers ER,. The effect of trabecular structure on DXA-based predictions of bovine bone failure. Calcif Tissue Int 1998; 63: 67-73. (Pubitemid 28289937)
13. Currey J,. Bones: structure and mechanics: Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2006.
14. Hernandez CJ, Gupta A, Keaveny TM,. A biomechanical analysis of the effects of resorption cavities on cancellous bone strength. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: 1248-1255. (Pubitemid 44128338)
15. Hernandez CJ,. How can bone turnover modify bone strength independent of bone mass? Bone 2008; 42: 1014-1020.
16. Kumarasinghe DD, Perilli E, Tsangari H, et al. Critical molecular regulators, histomorphometric indices and their correlations in the trabecular bone in primary hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010; 18: 1337-1344.
17. Carballido-Gamio J, Majumdar S,. Clinical utility of microarchitecture measurements of trabecular bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2006; 4: 64-70. (Pubitemid 44623938)
18. Wehrli FW,. Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 390-409. (Pubitemid 46204587)
19. Majumdar S, Kothari M, Augat P, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties. Bone 1998; 22: 445-454. (Pubitemid 28226857)
20. Genant HK, Gordon C, Jiang Y, et al. Advanced imaging of the macrostructure and microstructure of bone. Horm Res 2000; 54 (Suppl 1): 24-30. (Pubitemid 32037586)
21. Wehrli FW, Saha PK, Gomberg BR, et al. Role of magnetic resonance for assessing structure and function of trabecular bone. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 13: 335-355.
22. Link TM, Majumdar S,. Current diagnostic techniques in the evaluation of bone architecture. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2004; 2: 47-52.
23. Krug R, Banerjee S, Han ET, Newitt DC, Link TM, Majumdar S,. Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 1307-1314. (Pubitemid 41532082)
24. Wehrli FW, Song HK, Saha PK, Wright AC,. Quantitative MRI for the assessment of bone structure and function. NMR Biomed 2006; 19: 731-764. (Pubitemid 44811541)
25. Magland JF, Wehrli FW,. Trabecular bone structure analysis in the limited spatial resolution regime of in vivo MRI. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 1482-1493.
26. Faulkner KG, Gluer CC, Majumdar S, Lang P, Engelke K, Genant HK,. Noninvasive measurements of bone mass, structure, and strength: current methods and experimental techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 1229-1237.
27. Genant HK, Lang TF, Engelke K, et al. Advances in the noninvasive assessment of bone density, quality, and structure. Calcif Tissue Int 1996; 59: 10-15.
28. Folkesson J, Carballido-Gamio J, Eckstein F, Link TM, Majumdar S,. Local bone enhancement fuzzy clustering for segmentation of MR trabecular bone images. Med Phys 2010; 37: 295-302.
29. Issever AS, Link TM, Kentenich M, et al. Trabecular bone structure analysis in the osteoporotic spine using a clinical in vivo setup for 64-slice MDCT imaging: comparison to microCT imaging and microFE modeling. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24: 1628-1637.
30. Huber MB, Carballido-Gamio J, Fritscher K, et al. Development and testing of texture discriminators for the analysis of trabecular bone in proximal femur radiographs. Med Phys 2009; 36: 5089-5098.
31. Genant HK, Majumdar S,. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure. Osteoporos Int 1997; 7 (Suppl 3): S135-139.
32. Techawiboonwong A, Song HK, Magland JF, Saha PK, Wehrli FW,. Implications of pulse sequence in structural imaging of trabecular bone. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 22: 647-655. (Pubitemid 41572717)
33. Banerjee S, Choudhury S, Han ET, et al. Autocalibrating parallel imaging of in vivo trabecular bone microarchitecture at 3 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 1075-1084. (Pubitemid 44691350)
34. Magland J, Vasilic B, Wehrli FW,. Fast low-angle dual spin-echo (FLADE): a new robust pulse sequence for structural imaging of trabecular bone. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 465-471. (Pubitemid 43352542)
35. Krug R, Carballido-Gamio J, Burghardt AJ, et al. Assessment of trabecular bone structure comparing magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography ex vivo and in vivo. Osteoporos Int 2008; 19: 653-661.
36. Siffert RS, Luo GM, Cowin SC, Kaufman JJ,. Dynamic relationships of trabecular bone density, architecture, and strength in a computational model of osteopenia. Bone 1996; 18: 197-206. (Pubitemid 26092601)
37. Hwang SN, Wehrli FW, Williams JL,. Probability-based structural parameters from three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance images as predictors of trabecular bone strength. Med Phys 1997; 24: 1255-1261. (Pubitemid 27366467)
38. Ouyang X, Selby K, Lang P, et al. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the calcaneus: age-related changes in trabecular structure and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements. Calcif Tissue Int 1997; 60: 139-147. (Pubitemid 27057498)
39. McCalden RW, McGeough JA, Court-Brown CM,. Age-related changes in the compressive strength of cancellous bone. The relative importance of changes in density and trabecular architecture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 421-427. (Pubitemid 27136654)
40. Wehrli FW, Hwang SN, Ma J, Song HK, Ford JC, Haddad JG,. Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing. Radiology 1998; 206: 347-357. (Pubitemid 28112947)
41. Link TM, Majumdar S, Grampp S, et al. Imaging of trabecular bone structure in osteoporosis. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 1781-1788.
42. Pothuaud L, Porion P, Lespessailles E, Benhamou CL, Levitz P,. A new method for three-dimensional skeleton graph analysis of porous media: application to trabecular bone microarchitecture. J Microsc 2000; 199 (Pt 2): 149-161. (Pubitemid 30622413)
43. Wehrli FW, Gomberg BR, Saha PK, Song HK, Hwang SN, Snyder PJ,. Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 1520-1531. (Pubitemid 32675204)
44. Laib A, Newitt DC, Lu Y, Majumdar S,. New model-independent measures of trabecular bone structure applied to in vivo high-resolution MR images. Osteoporos Int 2002; 13: 130-136. (Pubitemid 34241033)
45. Jinnai H, Watashiba H, Kajihara T, Nishikawa Y, Takahashi M, Ito M,. Surface curvatures of trabecular bone microarchitecture. Bone 2002; 30: 191-194. (Pubitemid 34044318)
46. Cao H, Nazarian A, Ackerman JL, et al. Quantitative 31P NMR spectroscopy and 1H MRI measurements of bone mineral and matrix density differentiate metabolic bone diseases in rat models. Bone 2010; 46: 1582-1590.
47. Ma J, Wehrli FW,. Method for image-based measurement of the reversible and irreversible contribution to the transverse-relaxation rate. J Magn Reson B 1996; 111: 61-69. (Pubitemid 126758658)
48. Song HK, Wehrli FW, Ma J,. Field strength and angle dependence of trabecular bone marrow transverse relaxation in the calcaneus. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 382-388. (Pubitemid 28356976)
49. Wehrli FW, Ma J, Hopkins JA, Song HK,. Measurement of R'2 in the presence of multiple spectral components using reference spectrum deconvolution. J Magn Reson 1998; 131: 61-68. (Pubitemid 128450536)
50. Chung H, Wehrli FW, Williams JL, Kugelmass SD,. Relationship between NMR transverse relaxation, trabecular bone architecture, and strength. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90: 10250-10254. (Pubitemid 23328290)
51. Chung HW, Hwang SN, Yeung HN, Wehrli FW,. Mapping of the magnetic-field distribution in cancellous bone. J Magn Reson B 1996; 113: 172-176. (Pubitemid 126758763)
52. Bouchard LS, Wehrli FW, Chin CL, Warren WS,. Structural anisotropy and internal magnetic fields in trabecular bone: coupling solution and solid dipolar interactions. J Magn Reson 2005; 176: 27-36. (Pubitemid 41162472)
53. Capuani S, Curzi F, Alessandri FM, Maraviglia B, Bifone A,. Characterization of trabecular bone by dipolar demagnetizing field MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 683-689. (Pubitemid 32906137)
54. Capuani S, Alessandri FM, Bifone A, Maraviglia B,. Multiple spin echoes for the evaluation of trabecular bone quality. Magma 2002; 14: 3-9. (Pubitemid 34093236)
55. Ma J, Wehrli FW, Song HK,. Fast 3D large-angle spin-echo imaging (3D FLASE). Magn Reson Med 1996; 35: 903-910. (Pubitemid 26172628)
56. Song YQ, Ryu S, Sen PN,. Determining multiple length scales in rocks. Nature 2000; 406: 178-181. (Pubitemid 30468997)
57. Song YQ,. Pore sizes and pore connectivity in rocks using the effect of internal field. Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 19: 417-421.
58. Song YQ,. Using internal magnetic fields to obtain pore size distributions of porous media. Concepts Magn Reson A 2003; 18: 97-110.
59. Hurlimann MD,. Effective gradients in porous media due to susceptibility differences. J Magn Reson 1998; 131: 232-240. (Pubitemid 128450561)
60. Lisitza NV, Song YQ,. The behavior of diffusion eigenmodes in the presence of internal magnetic field in porous media. J Chem Phys 2001; 114: 9120-9124. (Pubitemid 32535680)
61. Sigmund EE, Cho H, Chen P, et al. Diffusion-based MR methods for bone structure and evolution. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 28-39.
62. Sigmund EE, Cho H, Song YQ,. High-resolution MRI of internal field diffusion-weighting in trabecular bone. NMR Biomed 2009; 22: 436-448.
63. Jaramillo D,. Whole-body MR imaging, bone diffusion imaging: how and why? Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40: 978-984.
64. Ababneh ZQ, Beloeil H, Berde CB, Ababneh AM, Maier SE, Mulkern RV,. In vivo lipid diffusion coefficient measurements in rat bone marrow. Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 27: 859-864.
65. Lehnert A, Machann J, Helms G, Claussen CD, Schick F,. Diffusion characteristics of large molecules assessed by proton MRS on a whole-body MR system. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 39-46. (Pubitemid 38221582)
66. Yeung DK, Wong SY, Griffith JF, Lau EM,. Bone marrow diffusion in osteoporosis: evaluation with quantitative MR diffusion imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 222-228. (Pubitemid 38166800)
67. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ,. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2004.
68. Haacke ME, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Ramesh V,. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York: Wiley; 1999.
69. Bevington PR, Robinson DK,. Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education; 2002.
70. Transtrum MK, Machta BB, Sethna JP,. Why are nonlinear fits to data so challenging? Phys Rev Lett 2010; 104: 060201.
71. Cohen J,. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 1962; 65: 145-153.
72. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP,. Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing: New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
73. Nocedal J, Wright S,. Numerical optimization. New York: Springer; 2006.