Compressive behaviour of bovine cancellous bone and bone analogous materials, microCT characterisation and FE analysis

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 4, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1452-1461

  Guillen T ^b   Zhang, Q H ^a   Tozzi, G ^a   Ohrndorf, A ^b   Christ, H J ^b   Tong, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bovine trabecular bone; Cellular materials; Compression; Damage; Metallic foams; Micro computed tomography (microCT)

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR MATERIAL; DAMAGE; METALLIC FOAMS; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (MICROCT); TRABECULAR BONES;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MECHANICAL TESTING; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; TOMOGRAPHY;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

METAL COMPLEX;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE TISSUE; CANCELLOUS BONE; COMPRESSION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FOAM CELL; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRABECULAR BONE;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; BONE AND BONES; CATTLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MATERIALS TESTING; METALS; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 79960556898     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: 18780180     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.05.015     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Akhtar R., Eichhorn S.J., Mummery P.M. Microstructure-based finite element modelling and characterisation of bovine trabecular bone. J. Bionic Eng. 2006, 3:3-9.
2. Andrews E., Sanders W., Gibson L.J. Compressive and tensile behaviour of aluminum foams. Mater. Sci. Eng. A - Struct. 1999, 270(2):113-124.
3. Antsiferov V.N., Makarov A.M., Khramtsov V.D. High-porosity and alloys in catalytic processes of gas cleaning. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2005, 7:77-89.
4. Ashby M.F. Mechanical properties of cellular solids. Metall. Trans. A 1998, 14:1755-1769.
5. Banhart J., Baumeister J. Deformation characteristics of metal foams. J. Mater. Sci. 1998, 33:1431-1440.
6. Bevill G., Keaveny T.M. Trabecular bone strength predictions using finite element analysis of micro-scale images at limited spatial resolution. Bone 2009, 44:579-584.
7. British Standard. BS EN 1982, 1999. Copper and copper alloys. Ingots and castings.
8. Carter D.R., Hayes W.C. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J. Bone Joint Surgery-American 1977, 59(7):954-962.
9. Ciarelli T.E., Fyhrie D.P., Schaffler M.B., Goldstein S.A. Variations in three-dimensional cancellous bone architecture of the proximal femur in female hip fractures and in controls. J. Bone Mineral Res. 2000, 15:32-40.
10. DIN 50134. 2008. Testing of metallic materials - Compression test of metallic cellular materials Deutsches Institut Fur Normung E.V. (German National Standard).
11. Ding M., Odgaard A., Hvid I. Technical note. Accuracy of cancellous bone volume fraction measured by micro-CT scanning. J. Biomech. 1999, 32:323-326.
12. Evans A.G., Hutchinson J.W., Ashby M.F. Multifunctionality of cellular metal systems. Prog. Mater. Sci. 1998, 43(3):171-221.
13. Gibson L.J. Biomechanics of cellular solids. J. Biomech. 2005, 38(3):377-399.
14. Gibson L.J., Ashby M.F. Cellular Solids 1988, Pergamon, Oxford.
15. Gibson L.J., Ashby M.F. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties 1997, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Gibson L.J., Ashby M.F., Zhang J., Triantafillou T.C. Failure surfaces for cellular materials under multiaxial loads. I. Modelling. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 1989, 31(9):635-663.
17. Girlich D., Franzke U. Open pore metal foams for heat exchange in ventilation and refrigeration. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2001, 3(6):351-352.
18. Goldstein S.A. The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. J. Biomech. 1987, 20:1055-1061.
19. Keaveny T.M., Borchers R.E., Gibson L.J., Hayes W.C. Trabecular bone modulus and strength can depend on specimen geometry. J. Biomech. 1993, 26:991-1000.
20. Keaveny T.M., Hayes W.C. A 20-year perspective on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 1993, 15:534-542.
21. Keaveny T.M., Wachtel E.F., Ford C.M., Hayes W.C. Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. J. Biomech. 1994, 27:1137-1146.
22. Keaveny T.M., Wachtel E.F., Zadesky S.P., Arramon Y.P. Application of the Tsai-Wu quadratic multiaxial failure criterion to bovine trabecular bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 1999, 121(1):99-107.
23. Keaveny T.M., Morgan E.F., Niebur G.L., Yeh O.C. Biomechanics of trabecular bone. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2001, 3:307-333.
24. Keaveny T.M., Pinilla T.P., Crawford R.P., Kopperdahl D.L., Lou A. Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone. J. Orthopaed. Res. 1997, 15(1):101-110.
25. Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?. Biomaterials 2006, 27:2907-2915.
26. Krupp U., Ohrndorf A., Guillen T., Christ H.J., Demiray S., Becker W., Hohe J. Isothermal and thermomechanical fatigue behavior of open-cell metal sponges. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2006, 8(9):821-827.
27. Li B., Aspden R.M. Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis. J. Bone Mineral Res. 1997, 12:641-651.
28. Linde F., Hvid I., Madsen F. The effect of specimen geometry on the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone specimens. J. Biomech. 1992, 25:359-368.
29. Linde F., Sørensen H.C. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. J. Biomech. 1993, 26(10):1249-1252.
30. Linde F. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of trabecular bone by a compression testing approach. Dan. Med. Bull. 1994, 41:119-138.
31. Makiyama A.M., Vajjhala S., Gibson L.J. Analysis of crack growth in a 3D Voronoi structure: a model for fatigue in low density trabecular bone. J. Biomech. Eng. 2002, 124(5):512-520.
32. Martin R.B., Burr D.B., Sharkey N.A. Skeletal Tissue Mechanics 1998, Springer Verlag, New York.
33. Nazarian A., Muller R. Time-lapsed microstructural imaging of bone failure behavior. J. Biomech. 2004, 37(1):55-65.
34. Nazarian A., Stauber M., Muller R. Design and implementation of a novel mechanical testing system for cellular solids. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 2005, 73B(2):400-411.
35. Nazarian A., Stauber M., Zurakowski D., Snyder B.D., Müller R. The interaction of microstructure and volume fraction in predicting failure in cancellous bone. Bone 2006, 39:1196-1202.
36. Nicholson P.H., Cheng X.G., Lowet G., Boonen S., Davie M.W., Dequeker J., Van der Perre G. Structural and material mechanical properties of human vertebral cancellous bone. Med. Eng. Phys. 1997, 19(8):729-737.
37. Niebur G.L., Feldstein M.J., Yuen J.C., Chen T.J., Keaveny T.M. High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:1575-1583.
38. Ohrndorf, A., Krupp, U., Christ, H.-J., 2005. Correlation between fracture behaviour and ductility of the cell strut material in case of metallic foams, In: 11th International Conference on Fracture - ICF11, Turin, Italien, pp. 4340-4345.
39. Ohrndorf A., Krupp U., Christ H.J. Metallic open-cell foams - A promising approach to fabricating good medical implants. Technol. Health Care 2006, 14(4-5):201-208.
40. Prakash O., Sang H., Embury J.D. Structure and properties of Al-SiC foam. Mater. Sci. Eng. A - Struct. 1995, 199(2):195-203.
41. Singh R., Lee P.D., Lindley T.C., Kohlhauser C., Hellmich C., Bram M., Imwinkelried T., Dashwood R.J. Characterization of the deformation behavior of intermediate porosity interconnected Ti foams using micro-computed tomography and direct finite element modeling. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6:2342-2351.
42. StanzI-Tschegg S.E., Mayer H.R., Beste A., Kroll S. Fatigue and fatigue crack propagation in AISi7Mg cast alloys under in-service loading conditions. Int. J. Fatigue 1995, 17:149-155.
43. Van Rietbergen B., Weinans H., Huiskes R., Odgaard A. A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. J. Biomech. 1995, 28(1):69-81.
44. Verhulp E., Van Rietbergen B., Muller R., Huiskes R. Micro-finite element simulation of trabecular-bone post-yield behaviour-effects of material model, element size and type. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 11:389-395.
45. Weber, M., Baumeister, J., Banhart, J., Kunze, H.-D., 1994. Selected mechanical and physical properties of metal foams. In: PM94 Proceedings of the Powder Metallurgy World Congress, Paris, France, pp. 585-588.
46. Yeh O.C., Keaveny T.M. Relative roles of microdamage and microfracture in the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone. J. Orthopaed. Res. 2001, 19:1001-1007.
47. Youssef S., Maire E., Gaertner R. Finite element modelling of the actual structure of cellular materials determined by X-ray tomography. Acta Mater. 2005, 53:719-730.