Birthplace-dependent dispersal: Are directions of natal dispersal determined a priori?

Ecography

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 729-737

  Penteriani, Vincenzo ^a,b   Delgado, M M ^a,c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HABITAT SELECTION; INBREEDING AVOIDANCE; KIN RECOGNITION; NATAL DISPERSAL; NEST; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION STRUCTURE; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; RADIOTELEMETRY; RAPTOR; SIBLING;

ANIMALIA; BUBO BUBO; STRIGIFORMES; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 79960554770     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06773.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alberico, J. A. R. et al. 1992. Non-random philopatry of sibling spotted sandpipers Actitis macularia. Ornis Scand. 23: 504-508.
2. Arcese, P. 1989. Intrasexual competition, mating system and natal dispersal in song sparrows. Anim. Behav. 38: 958-979.
3. Baguette, M. et al. in press. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly. Experimental changes in habitat quality induced negative density-dependent dispersal. Ecography.
4. Benard, M. F. and McCauley, S. J. 2008. Integrating across life-history stages: consequences of natal habitat effects on dispersal. Am. Nat. 171: 553-567.
5. Bowler, D. E. and Benton, T. G. 2005. Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol. Rev. 80: 205-225.
6. Clobert, J. et al. 2004. Causes, mechanisms and consequences of dispersal. - In: Hanski, I. and Gaggiotti, O. E. (eds), Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Academic Press, pp. 307-335.
7. Clobert, J. et al. 2009. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and dynamics of spatially structures populations. Ecol. Lett. 12: 197-209.
8. Cote, J. and Clobert, J. 2007. Social information and emigration: lessons from immigrants. Ecol. Lett. 10: 411-417.
9. Cressman, R. and Křivan, V. 2006. Migration dynamics for the ideal free distribution. Am. Nat. 168: 384-397.
10. Dale, S. 2010. Sibling resemblance in natal dispersal distance and direction in the ortolan bunting Emberiza hortulana. Ibis 152: 292-298.
11. Delgado, M. M. and Penteriani, V. 2008. Behavioral states help translate dispersal movements into spatial distribution patterns of floaters. Am. Nat. 172: 475-485.
12. Delgado, M. M. et al. 2009a. Changes of movement patterns from early dispersal to settlement. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 35-43.
13. Delgado, M. M. et al. 2009b. How fledglings explore surroundings from fledging to dispersal? A case study with eagle owls. Ardea 97: 7-15.
14. Delgado, M. M. et al. 2010. The effect of phenotypic traits and external cues on natal dispersal movements. J. Anim. Ecol. 79: 620-632.
15. Dias, P. C. 1996. Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 326-330.
16. Diffendorfer, J. E. et al. 1995. Habitat fragmentation and movements of three small mammals (Simodon, Microtus, and Peromyscus). Ecology 76: 827-839.
17. Doebeli, M. and Ruxton, G. D. 1998. Stabilization through spatial pattern formation in metapopulations with long-range dispersal. Proc. R. Soc. B 265: 1325-1332.
18. Doligez, B. et al. 2009. 'Heritability' of dispersal propensity in a patchy population. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 2829-2836.
19. Doncaster, C. P. 2000. Extension of ideal free resource use to breeding populations and metapopulations. Oikos 89: 24-36.
20. Doncaster, C. P. et al. 1997. Balanced dispersal between spatially varying local populations: an alternative to the source-sink model. Am. Nat. 150: 425-445.
21. Drent, P. J. 1984. Mortality and dispersal in summer and its consequences for the density of great tits Parus major at the onset of autumn. Ardea 1972: 127-162.
22. Fahrig, L. and Merriam, G. 1994. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv. Biol. 8: 50-59.
23. Flaxman, S. M. and Reeve, H. K. 2006. Putting competition strategies into ideal free distribution models: habitat selection as a tug of war. J. Theor. Biol. 243: 587-593.
24. Fretwell, S. D. and Lucas, H. L. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. I. Theoretical development. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36.
25. Gandon, S. 1999. Kin competition, the cost of inbreeding and the evolution of dispersal. J. Theor. Biol. 200: 345-364.
26. Greenwood, P. J. 1980. Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals. Anim. Behav. 28: 1140-1162.
27. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford Univ. Press.
28. Hanski, I. and Saccheri, I. 2006. Molecular-level variation affects population growth in a butterfly metapopulation. PLOS Biol. 4: e129.
29. Harper, D. G. C. 1982. Competitive foraging in mallards: 'ideal free' ducks. Anim. Behav. 30: 575-584.
30. Holt, R. D. and Barfield, M. 2001. On the relationship between the ideal free distribution and the evolution of dispersal. - In: Clobert, J. et al (eds), Dispersal. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 83-95.
31. Hugie, D. M. and Grand, T. C. 1998. Movement between patches, unequal competitors and the ideal free distribution. Evol. Ecol. 12: 1-19.
32. Kacelnik, A. et al. 1992. The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 50-55.
33. Kauffman, M. J. et al. 2004. Spatial structure, dispersal, and management of a recovering raptor population. Am. Nat. 164: 582-597.
34. Leturque, H. and Rousset, F. 2002. Dispersal, kin competition, and the ideal free distribution in a spatially heterogeneous population. Theor. Popul. Biol. 62: 169-180.
35. Littell, R. C. et al. 2002. SAS for linear models, 4th edn. SAS Inst., Cary.
36. Marchetti, G. M. and Scapini, F. 2003. Use of multiple regression models in the study of sandhopper orientation under natural conditions. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 58S: 207-215.
37. Massot, M. and Clobert, J. 2000. Processes at the origin of similarities in dispersal behaviour among siblings. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 707-719.
38. Matthysen, E. 2002. Boundary effects on dispersal between habitat patches by forest birds (Parus major, P. caeruleus). Landscape Ecol. 17: 509-515.
39. Matthysen, E. et al. 2005. Do sibling tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) disperse over similar distances and in similar directions?. Oecologia 143: 301-307.
40. Matthysen, E. et al. 2010. Family movements before independence influence natal dispersal in a territorial songbird. Oecologia 162: 591-597.
41. McPeek, M. A. and Holt, R. D. 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. Am. Nat. 140: 1010-1027.
42. Morrissey, M. B. and de Kerckhove, D. T. 2009. The maintenance of genetic variation due to asymmetric gene flow in dendritic metapopulations. Am. Nat. 174: 875-889.
43. Motro, U. 1991. Avoiding inbreeding and sibling competition: the evolution of sexual dimorphism for dispersal. Am. Nat. 137: 108-115.
44. Nathan, R. 2008. An emerging movement ecology paradigm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105: 19050-19051.
45. Newton, I. and Marquiss, M. 1983. Dispersal of sparrowhawks between birthplace and breeding place. J. Anim. Ecol. 52: 463-477.
46. Pasinelli, G. et al. 2004. Genetic and environmental influences on natal dispersal distances in a resident bird species. Am. Nat. 164: 660-669.
47. Penteriani, V. et al. 2005a. Development of chicks and pre-dispersal behaviour of young in the eagle owl Bubo bubo. Ibis 147: 155-168.
48. Penteriani, V. et al. 2005b. Floater survival affects population persistence. The role of prey availability and environmental stochasticity. Oikos 108: 523-534.
49. Penteriani, V. et al. 2008. Owls and rabbits: predation against substandard individuals of an easy prey. J. Avian Biol. 39: 215-221.
50. Presnell, B. et al. 1998. Projected multivariate linear models for directional data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 93: 1068-1077.
51. Pulliam, H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132: 652-661.
52. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing .
53. Rohner, C. 1997. Non-territorial 'floaters' in great horned owls: space use during a cyclic peak of snowshoe hares. Anim. Behav. 53: 901-912.
54. Ronce, O. 2007. How does it feel to be like a rolling stone? Ten questions about dispersal evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38: 231-253.
55. Ronce, O. et al. 2000. Kin selection and natal dispersal in an age-structured population. Theor. Popul. Biol. 58: 143-159.
56. Rousset, F. and Billiard, S. 2000. A theoretical basis for measures of kin selection in subdivided populations: finite populations and localized dispersal. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 814-825.
57. Rousset, F. and Gandon, S. 2002. Evolution of the distribution of dispersal distance under distance-dependent cost of dispersal. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 515-523.
58. Roze, D. and Rousset, F. 2005. Inbreeding depression and the evolution of dispersal rates: a multilocus model. Am. Nat. 166: 708-721.
59. Schooley, R. L. and Wiens, J. A. 2003. Finding habitat patches and directional connectivity. Oikos 102: 559-570.
60. Sharp, S. P. et al. 2008. Natal dispersal and recruitment in a cooperatively breeding bird. Oikos 117: 1371-1379.
61. Sutherland, W. J. and Parker, G. A. 1992. The relationship between continuous input and interference models of ideal free distributions with unequal competitors. Anim. Behav. 44: 345-355.
62. Szulkin, M. and Sheldon, B. C. 2008. Dispersal as a means of inbreeding avoidance in a wild bird population. Proc. R. Soc. B 275: 703-711.
63. van der Meer, J. and Ens, B. J. 1997. Models of interference and their consequences for the spatial distribution of ideal and free predators. J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 846-858.
64. van Noordwijk, A. J. 1984. Problems in the analysis of dispersal and a critique on its 'heritability' in the great tit. J. Anim. Ecol. 53: 533-544.
65. van Tienderen, P. H. and van Noordwijk, A. J. 1988. Dispersal, kinship and inbreeding in an island population of the great tit. J. Evol. Biol. 2: 117-137.
66. Tonkyn, D. W. and Plissner, J. H. 1991. Models of multiple dispersers from the nest: predictions and interference. Ecology 72: 1721-1730.
67. Vuilleumier, S. and Possingham, H. P. 2006. Does colonization asymmetry matter in metapopulation?. Proc. R. Soc. B 273: 1637-1642.
68. Yates, M. G. et al. 2000. Contrasting interference functions and foraging dispersion in two species of shorebird (Charadrii). J. Anim. Ecol. 69: 314-322.