Discriminating between ADHD adults and controls using independent ERP components and a support vector machine: A validation study

Nonlinear Biomedical Physics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Mueller, Andreas ^a   Candrian, Gian ^a   Grane, Venke Arntsberg ^b   Kropotov, Juri D ^c   Ponomarev, Valery A ^c   Baschera, Gian Marco ^d  

^a Organisation und Entwicklung   (Switzerland)

^b Helgeland Hospital   (Norway)

^c Institute of the Human Brain Russian Academy of Sciences   (Russian Federation)

^d ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; VALIDATION STUDY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 79960554735     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17534631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1753-4631-5-5     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Biederman J: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a selective overview. Biol Psychiatry 2005, 57:1215-1220.
2. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-IV. 4 edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
3. Hill JC, Schoener EP: Age-dependent decline of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1996, 153:1143-1146.
4. Biederman J, Petty CR, Evans M, Small J, Faraone SV: How persistent is ADHD? A controlled 10-year follow-up study of boys with ADHD. Psychiatry Res 2010, 177:299-304.
5. Faraone SV, Biederman J, Mick E: The age-dependent decline of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analysis of follow-up studies. Psychol Med 2006, 36:159-165.
6. Barkley RA, Murphy KR, Fischer M: ADHD in adults What the science says New York: Guilford Press; 2008.
7. Barkley RA: Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychol Bull 1997, 121:65-94.
8. Barkley RA: ADHD and the nature of self control New York: Guilford Press; 2005.
9. Kropotov JD: Quantitative EEG, event-related potentials and neurotherapy Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic; 2009.
10. Kropotov JD, Etlinger SC: Selection of actions in the basal gangliathalamocortical circuits: review and model. Int J Psychophysiol 1999, 31:197-217.
11. Barry RJ, Johnstone SJ, Clarke AR: A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: II. Event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114:184-198.
12. Falkenstein M, Koshlykova NA, Kiroj VN, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J: Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995, 96:36-43.
13. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ: Inhibitory processing during the Go/ NoGo task: an ERP analysis of children with attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol 2004, 115:1320-1331.
14. Broyd SJ, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ, Clarke AR, McCarthy R, Selikowitz M, Lawrence CA: The effect of methylphenidate on response inhibition and the event-related potential of children with attention deficit/ hyperactivity disorder. Int J Psychophysiol 2005, 58:47-58.
15. Johnstone SJ, Clarke AR: Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res 2009, 166:223-237.
16. Prox V, Dietrich DE, Zhang Y, Emrich HM, Ohlmeier MD: Attentional processing in adults with ADHD as reflected by event-related potentials. Neurosci Lett 2007, 419:236-241.
17. Fallgatter AJ, Ehlis AC, Rosler M, Strik WK, Blocher D, Herrmann MJ: Diminished prefrontal brain function in adults with psychopathology in childhood related to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Res 2005, 138:157-169.
18. Fallgatter AJ, Bartsch AJ, Herrmann MJ: Electrophysiological measurements of anterior cingulate function. J Neural Transm 2002, 109:977-988.
19. Folstein JR, Van PC: Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 2008, 45:152-170.
20. Pascual-Marqui RD: Standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA): technical details. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 2002, 24(Suppl D):5-12.
21. Makeig S, Bell AJ, Jung TP, Sejnowski TJ: Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Edited by: Touretzky D, Mozer M, Hasselmo M. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996:145-151.
22. Stone JV: Independent component analysis A tutorial introduction Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2004.
23. Kropotov JD, Ponomarev VA: Decomposing N2 NOGO wave of eventrelated potentials into independent components. Neuroreport 2009, 20:1592-1596.
24. Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ: Aiding diagnosis of attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder and its subtypes: discriminant function analysis of event-related potential data. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2003, 44:1067-1075.
25. Das K, Giesbrecht B, Eckstein MP: Predicting variations of perceptual performance across individuals from neural activity using pattern classifiers. Neuroimage 2010, 51:1425-1437.
26. Harner R: Automatic EEG spike detection. Clin EEG Neurosci 2009, 40:262-270.
27. Lofhede J, Lofgren N, Thordstein M, Flisberg A, Kjellmer I, Lindecrantz K: Classification of burst and suppression in the neonatal electroencephalogram. J Neural Eng 2008, 5:402-410.
28. Merzagora AC, Butti M, Polikar R, Izzetoglu M, Bunce S, Cerutti S, Bianchi AM, Onaral B: Model comparison for automatic characterization and classification of average ERPs using visual oddball paradigm. Clin Neurophysiol 2009, 120:264-274.
29. Mueller A, Candrian G, Kropotov JD, Ponomarev VA, Baschera GM: Classification of ADHD patients on the basis of independent ERP components using a machine learning system. Nonlinear Biomed Phys 2010, 4(Suppl 1):S1.
30. Barkley RA, Murphy KR: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder A clinical workbook. 3 edition. New York: Guilford Press; 2006.
31. Franke GH: Brief symptom inventory (BSI) von L R Derogatis (Kurzform der SCL-90-R) Deutsche Version. Göttingen: Beltz Test; 2000.
32. Derogatis LR: SCL-90R, administration, scoring & procedures manual-II for the R(evised) version and other instruments of the psychopathology rating scale series Townson: Clinical Psychometric Research, Inc; 1992.
33. Vigario RN: Extraction of ocular artefacts from EEG using independent component analysis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997, 103:395-404.
34. Onton J, Makeig S: Information-based modelling of event-related brain dynamics. In Progress in Brain Dynamics. Edited by: Neuper C, Klimesch W. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006:.
35. Rosenblatt F: The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 1958, 65:386-408.
36. Aizermann MA, Braverman E, Rozonoer L: Theoretical foundations of the potential function method in pattern recognition learning. Automation and Remote Control 1964, 25:821-837.
37. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J: The elements of statistical learning. Data mining, inference, and prediction. 2 edition. New York, N.Y, Springer; 2009.
38. Arlot S, Celisse A: A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. 2009, arXiv:0907.4728.
39. Hillyard SA, Anllo-Vento L: Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:781-787.
40. Näätänen R: Attention and brain function Hillsdale, New Jersey etc.: L. Erlbaum; 1992.
41. Itier RJ, Taylor MJ: N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. Cereb Cortex 2004, 14:132-142.
42. Rossion B, Joyce CA, Cottrell GW, Tarr MJ: Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex. Neuroimage 2003, 20:1609-1624.
43. Rossion B, Collins D, Goffaux V, Curran T: Long-term expertise with artificial objects increases visual competition with early face categorization processes. J Cogn Neurosci 2007, 19:543-555.
44. Bekker EM, Kenemans JL, Verbaten MN: Source analysis of the N2 in a cued Go/NoGo task. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005, 22:221-231.
45. Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Weller BJ, Kopell BS: ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985, 60:423-434.
46. Polich J: Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118:2128-2148.
47. Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J: ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1999, 101:267-291.
48. Escera C, Alho K, Schroger E, Winkler I: Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2000, 5:151-166.
49. Kovatchev B, Cox D, Hill R, Reeve R, Robeva R, Loboschefski T: A psychophysiological marker of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-defining the EEG consistency index. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2001, 26:127-140.
50. Satterfield JH, Braley BW: Evoked potentials and brain maturation in hyperactive and normal children. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1977, 43:43-51.
51. Buchsbaum M, Wender P: Average evoked responses in normal and minimally brain dysfunctioned children treated with amphetamine. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1973, 29:764-770.
52. Robaey P, Breton F, Dugas M, Renault B: An event-related potential study of controlled and automatic processes in 6-8-year-old boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 82:330-340.
53. Aron AR, Poldrack RA: The cognitive neuroscience of response inhibition: relevance for genetic research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2005, 57:1285-1292.
54. Jodo E, Kayama Y: Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992, 82:477-482.
55. Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, van den Wildenberg W, Ridderinkhof KR: Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/nogo task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2003, 3:17-26.
56. Verleger R, Jaskowski P, Wascher E: Evidence for an integrative role of P3b in linking reaction to perception. Journal of Psychophysiology 2005, 19:165-181.
57. Kok A: On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:557-577.
58. Ikeda A, Luders HO, Burgess RC, Shibasaki H: Movement-related potentials associated with single and repetitive movements recorded from human supplementary motor area. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993, 89:269-277.
59. Courchesne E, Hillyard SA, Galambos R: Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1975, 39:131-143.
60. Sokolov EN, Nezlina NI, Polyanskii VB, Evtikhin DV: The orientating reflex: the "targeting reaction" and "searchlight of attention". Neurosci Behav Physiol 2002, 32:347-362.
61. Escera C, Yago E, Alho K: Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. Eur J Neurosci 2001, 14:877-883.
62. Goldstein A, Spencer KM, Donchin E: The influence of stimulus deviance and novelty on the P300 and novelty P3. Psychophysiology 2002, 39:781-790.
63. Escera C, Alho K, Winkler I, Naatanen R: Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci 1998, 10:590-604.
64. Debener S, Makeig S, Delorme A, Engel AK: What is novel in the novelty oddball paradigm? Functional significance of the novelty P3 event-related potential as revealed by independent component analysis. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005, 22:309-321.
65. Dien J, Spencer KM, Donchin E: Localization of the event-related potential novelty response as defined by principal components analysis. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003, 17:637-650.
66. Boutros NN, Mears R, Pflieger ME, Moxon KA, Ludowig E, Rosburg T: Sensory gating in the human hippocampal and rhinal regions: regional differences. Hippocampus 2008, 18:310-316.