Increased diagnostic accuracy of atypical glandular cells in cervical liquid-based cytology using cell blocks

Cytopathology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 253-260

  Risse, E K J ^a   Holierhoek, J P ^a   Meijer Marres, E M ^a   Ouwerkerk Noordam, E ^a   Boon, M E ^a  

^a LEIDEN CYTOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY LABORATORY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adenocarcinoma in situ; Atypical glandular cells; Cell blocks; Cervical cytology; Diagnostic accuracy; Immunohistochemistry; Liquid based cytology; Mimics

Indexed keywords

CD45 ANTIGEN; KI 67 ANTIGEN; PARAFFIN; PROTEIN P16;

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYPERPLASIA; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LIQUID CULTURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METAPLASIA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVICITIS; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; VAGINAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA;

ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CERVIX UTERI; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; NEOPLASM STAGING; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERINE CERVICITIS;

EID: 79960534550     PISSN: 09565507     EISSN: 13652303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2010.00793.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R et al.; Forum Group Members; Bethesda 2001 Workshop. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002;287:2114-9.
2. Levine L, Lucci JA III, Dürh TV. Atypical glandular cells: new Bethesda Terminology and Management Guidelines. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2003;58:399-406.
3. Bibbo M, Wilbur DC. Comprehensive Cytopathology. 3rd edn. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Saunders Elsevier; 2008; p. 85-6.
4. Tam KF, Cheung AN, Liu KL et al. A retrospective review on atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) using the Bethesda 2001 classification. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:603-7.
5. Schnatz PF, Guile M, O'Sullivan DM, Sorosky JI. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells on cervical cytology. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:701-8.
6. Behtash N, Nazari Z, Fakhrejahani F, Khafaf A, Azar EG. Clinical and histological significance of atypical glandular cell on Pap smear. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007;47:46-9.
7. Lee CY, Ng WK. Follow-up study of atypical glandular cells in gynecologic cytology using conventional Pap smears and liquid-based preparations: impact of the Bethesda System 2001. Acta Cytol 2008;52:159-68.
8. Zhao C, Austin RM, Pan J et al. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells in conventional pap smears in a large, high-risk U.S. west coast minority population. Acta Cytol 2009;53:153-9.
9. Wood MD, Horst JA, Bibbo M. Weeding atypical glandular cell look-alikes from the true atypical lesions in liquid-based Pap tests: a review. Diagn Cytopathol 2007;35:12-7.
10. Risse EKJ, Ouwerkerk-Noordam E, Meijer-Marres EM, Boon ME. Exploiting the residual of cervical thin layer brush samples through cytohistology in cases with invasive carcinoma with application of antibodies. Acta Cytol 2010;54:175-82.
11. Boon ME, Ouwerkerk-Noordam E, Suurmeijer AJH, Kok LP. Diagnostic parameters in liquid-based cervical cytology using a coagulant suspension fixative. Acta Cytol 2005;49:513-9.
12. INK4a, CEA, Ki-67, P53 and ER/PR in the differential diagnosis of benign, premalignant, and malignant glandular lesions of the uterine cervix and their relationship with Silverberg scoring system for endocervical glandular lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2007;26:71-5.
13. Brown DC, Cole D, Gatter KC, Mason DY. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri: an assessment of tumour proliferation using the monoclonal antibody Ki-67. Br J Cancer 1988;57:178-81.
14. Garzetti GG, Ciavattini A, De Nictolis M et al. MIB 1 immunostaining in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: prognostic significance in mild and moderate lesions. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996;42:261-6.
15. INK4a expression in cervical premalignant and malignant lesions. Exp Mol Pathol 2006;80:192-6.
16. INK4a expression in the female genital tract and its value in diagnosis. Adv Anat Pathol 2006;13:8-15.
17. INK4a in cell lysates obtained from cervical samples. Cancer 2006;107:2307-13.
18. INK4a overexpression and HPV infection in uterine cervix adenocarcinoma. Virchows Arch 2006;448:597-603.
19. INK4a expression and human papillomavirus testing: a comparative study using simultaneously sampled histology materials. Cancer 2004;102:100-8.
20. INK4a expression patterns points to high-risk HPV as the main causative agent for adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma of the cervix. J Pathol 2003;201:535-43.
21. Barroeta JE, Pasha TL, Acs G, Zhang PJ. Immunoprofile of endocervical and endometrial stromal cells and its potential application in localization of tumor involvement. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2007;26:76-82.
22. McCluggage WG, Sumathi VP, Maxwell P. CD10 is a sensitive and diagnostically useful immunohistochemical marker of normal endometrial stroma and of endometrial stromal neoplasms. Histopathology 2001;39:273-8.
23. Tabibzadeh S. Proliferative activity of lymphoid cells in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;70:437-43.
24. Jeng CJ, Liang HS, Wang TY et al. Cytologic and histologic review of atypical glandular cells (AGC) detected during cervical cytology screening. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003;13:518-21.
25. Horrée N, Heintz A, Sie-Go DM, van Diest PJ. p16 is consistently expressed in endometrial tubal metaplasia. Cell Oncol 2007;29:37-45.