Organizational goal ambiguity and performance: Conceptualization, measurement, and relationships

International Public Management Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 193-217

  Chan, Su Jung ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960503662     PISSN: 10967494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2011.589760     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Allison, G. T. 1983. "Public and Private Management: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects?" Pp. 72-92 in J. L. Perry and K. L. Kraemer, eds., Public Management. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
2. Anderson, J. E. 1997. Public Policymaking: An Introduction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
3. Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker. 2006. "Strategy Content and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Analysis." Public Administration Review 66(1): 52-63.
4. Asch, B. 2005. "The Economic Complexities of Incentives Reforms." Pp. 309-342 in R. Klitgaard and P. C. Light, eds., High-Performance Government: Structure, Leadership, Incentives. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
5. Bagozzi, R. P., Y. Yi, and L. W. Phillips. 1991. "Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research." Administrative Science Quarterly 36(3): 421-458.
6. Baier, V. E., J. G. March, and H. Saetren. 1986. "Implementation and Ambiguity." Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies 2(3-4): 197-212.
7. Bandura, A. 1989. "Self-Regulation of Motivation and Action Through Internal Standards and Goal Systems." Pp. 19-85 in L. A. Pervin, ed., Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Bandura, A. and D. Cervone. 1983. "Self-Evaluative and Self-Efficacy Mechanisms Governing the Motivational Effects of Goal Systems." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(5): 1017-1028.
9. Behn, R. D. 2001. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10. Berman, P. 1978. "The Study of Macro- and Micro-implementation of Social Policy." Public Policy 26(2): 157-184.
11. Berman, P. 1980. "Thinking About Programmed and Adaptive Implementation: Matching Strategies to Situations." Pp. 205-227 in H. M. Ingram and D. E. Mann, eds., Why Policies Succeed or Fail. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Blau, P. M. 1955. The Dynamics of Bureaucracy: A Study of Interpersonal Relations in Two Government Agencies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
13. Bozeman, B. 2000. Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14. Bozeman, B. and G. Kingsley. 1998. "Risk Culture in Public and Private Organizations." Public Administration Review 58(2): 109-118.
15. Brass, C. T. 2004. The Bush Administration's Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
16. Brewer, G. A. 2005. "In the Eye of the Storm: Frontline Supervisors and Federal Agency Performance." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 505-527.
17. Buchanan, B. 1974. "Government Managers, Business Executives, and Organizational Commitment." Public Administration Review 34(4): 339-347.
18. Child, J. 1972. "Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice." Sociology 6(1): 1-22.
19. Chun, Y. H. 2003. Goal Ambiguity in Public Organizations: Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences. PhD diss., University of Georgia.
20. Chun, Y. H. and H. G. Rainey. 2005a. "Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Agencies." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 529-557.
21. Chun, Y. H. and H. G. Rainey. 2005b. "Goal Ambiguity in U.S. Federal Agencies." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(1): 1-30.
22. Congressional Quarterly. 2008. Federal Regulatory Directory, 13th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
23. Dahl, R. A. and C. E. Lindblom. 1953. Politics, Economics, and Welfare. New York: Harper and Row.
24. Downs, A. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown.
25. Drucker, P. F. 1980. "The Deadly Sins in Public Administration." Public Administration Review 40(2): 103-106.
26. Etzioni, A. 1964. Modern Organizations. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27. Feldman, M. S. 1989. Order Without Design: Information Production and Policy Making. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28. Fleishman, J. A. 1988. "The Effects of Decision Framing and Others' Behavior on Cooperation in a Social Dilemma." The Journal of Conflict Resolution 32(1): 162-180.
29. Frederickson, D. G. and G. H. Frederickson. 2006. Measuring the Performance of the Hollow State. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
30. Freeman, J., G. R. Carroll, and M. T. Hannan. 1983. "The Liability of Newness: Age Dependence in Organizational Death Rates." American Sociological Review 48(5): 692-710.
31. Friedlander, F. and H. Pickle. 1968. "Components of Effectiveness in Small Organizations." Administrative Science Quarterly 13(2): 289-304.
32. Gellatly, I. R. and P. G. Irving. 2001. "Personality, Autonomy, and Contextual Performance of Managers." Human Performance 14(3): 231-245.
33. Georgopoulos, B. S. and A. S. Tannenbaum. 1957. "A Study of Organizational Effectiveness." American Sociological Review 22(5): 534-540.
34. Gibson, J. L., J. M. Ivancevich, and J. J. H. Donnelly. 1973. Organizations: Structure, Process, Behavior. Dallas, TX: Business Publishing, Inc.
35. Gilmour, J. B. and D. E. Lewis. 2006a. "Assessing Performance Budgeting at OMB: The Influence of Politics, Performance, and Program Size." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(2): 169-186.
36. Gilmour, J. B. and D. E. Lewis. 2006b. "Political Appointees and the Competence of Federal Program Management." American Politics Research 34(1): 22-50.
37. Glisson, C. A. and P. Y. Martin. 1980. "Productivity and Efficiency in Human Service Organizations as Related to Structure, Size, and Age." Academy of Management Journal 23(1): 21-37.
38. Goggin, M. L., A. O. Bowman, J. P. Lester, and L. J. O'Toole, Jr. 1990. Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman=Little, Brown.
39. Greene, W. H. 2000. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40. Heckman, J. J., C. Heinrich, and J. Smith. 2002. "The Performance of Performance Standards." Journal of Human Resources 37(4): 778-811.
41. Heinrich, C. J. 1999. "Do Government Bureaucrats Make Effective Use of Performance Management Information?" Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(3): 363-393.
42. Heinrich, C. J. 2003. "Measuring Public Sector Performance and Effectiveness." Pp. 25-37 in G. B. Peters and J. Pierre, eds., Handbook of Public Administration. London: Saga Publications.
43. Heinrich, C. J. 2007. "False or Fitting Recognition? The Use of High Performance Bonuses in Motivating Organizational Achievements." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 26(2): 281-304.
44. Heinrich, C. J. and Y. Choi. 2007. "Performance-Based Contracting in Social Welfare Programs." The American Review of Public Administration 37(4): 409-435.
45. Hoskisson, R. E., M. A. Hitt, R. A. Johnson, and D. D. Moesel. 1993. "Construct Validity of an Objective (Entropy) Categorical Measure of Diversification Strategy." Strategic Management Journal 14(3): 215-235.
46. Jehn, K. A. and E. A. Mannix. 2001. "The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance." Academy of Management Journal 44(2): 238-251.
47. Khademian, A. M. 1995. "Reinventing a Government Corporation: Professional Priorities and a Clear Bottom Line." Public Administration Review 55(1): 17-28.
48. Kirchhoff, B. A. 1977. "Organization Effectiveness Measurement and Policy Research." Academy of Management Review 2(3): 347-355.
49. Lan, Z. and H. G. Rainey. 1992. "Goals, Rules, and Effectiveness in Public, Private, and Hybrid Organizations: More Evidence on Frequent Assertions About Differences." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2(1): 5-28.
50. Latham, G. P. and T. W. Lee. 1986. "Goal Setting." Pp. 101-117 in E. A. Locke, ed., Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
51. Lee, T. W., E. A. Locke, and G. P. Latham. 1989. "Goal Setting Theory and Job Performance." Pp. 291-326 in L. A. Pervin, ed., Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Lewis, D. E. 2007. "Testing Pendleton's Premise: Do Political Appointees Make Worse Bureaucrats?" The Journal of Politics 69(4): 1073-1088.
53. Lewis, D. E. 2008. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54. Lindblom, C. E. 1959. "The Science of 'Muddling Through."' Public Administration Review 19(2): 79-88.
55. Lipsky, M. 1980. Stree-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
56. Locke, E. A. and G. P. Latham. 2002. "Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey." American Psychologist 57(9): 705-717.
57. Locke, E. A., K. N. Shaw, L. M. Saari, and G. P. Latham. 1981. "Goal Setting and Task Performance: 1969-1980." Psychological Bulletin 90(1): 125-152.
58. Lowi, T. J. 1979. The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.
59. Lynn, L. E. 1981. Managing the Public's Business. New York: Basic Books.
60. Lynn, L. E. 1987. Managing Public Policy. Boston: Little, Brown.
61. Matland, R. E. 1995. "Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5(2): 145-174.
62. Meier, K. J. 1980. "Measuring Organizational Power: Resources and Autonomy of Government Agencies." Administration Society 12(3): 357-375.
63. Meier, K. J., L. J. O'Toole, Jr., and H. T. Goerdel. 2006. "Management Activity and Program Performance: Gender as Management Capital." Public Administration Review 66(1): 24-36.
64. Mercatus Center. 2007. 9th Annual Performance Report Scorecard: Which Federal Agencies Best Inform the Public? Arlington, VA: George Mason University.
65. Meyers, M. K., N. M. Riccucci, and I. Lurie. 2001. "Achieving Goal Congruence in Complex Environments: The Case of Welfare Reform." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(2): 165-201.
66. Mott, P. E. 1972. The Characteristics of Effective Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
67. Moynihan, D. P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
68. Pandey, S. K. and J. L. Garnett. 2006. "Exploring Public Sector Communication Performance: Testing a Model and Drawing Implications." Public Administration Review 66(1): 37-51.
69. Pandey, S. K. and B. E. Wright. 2006. "Connecting the Dots in Public Management: Political Environment, Organizational Goal Ambiguity, and the Public Manager's Role Ambiguity." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(4): 511-532.
70. Perry, J. L. and L. W. Porter. 1982. "Factors Affecting the Context for Motivation in Public Organizations." The Academy of Management Review 7(1): 89-98.
71. Pitts, D. W. 2005. "Diversity, Representation, and Performance: Evidence About Race and Ethnicity in Public Organizations." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 615-631.
72. Price, J. L. 1968. Organizational Effectiveness: An Inventory of Propositions. Homewood, IL: Richard D Irwin, Inc.
73. Price, J. L. 1971. "The Study of Organizational Effectiveness." The Sociological Quarterly 13(1): 3-15.
74. Radin, B. A. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
75. Rainey, H. G. 1983. "Public Agencies and Private Firms: Incentive Structures, Goals, and Individual Roles." Administration & Society 15(2): 207-242.
76. Rainey, H. G. 1993. "A Theory of Goal Ambiguity in Public Organizations." Pp. 121-166 in J. L. Perry, ed., Research in Public Administration, Vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
77. Rainey, H. G. 2009. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
78. Rainey, H. G. 2010. "Goal Ambiguity and the Study of American Bureaucracy." Pp. 231-251 in R. F. Durant, ed., The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
79. Rainey, H. G. and B. Bozeman. 2000. "Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): 447-469.
80. Rainey, H. G., S. Pandey, and B. Bozeman. 1995. "Research Note: Public and Private Managers' Perceptions of Red Tape." Public Administration Review 55(6): 567-574.
81. Rainey, H. G. and P. Steinbauer. 1999. "Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9(1): 1-32.
82. Ripley, R. B. and G. A. Franklin. 1982. Bureaucracy and Policy Implementation. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.
83. Schein, E. H. 1970. Organizational Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
84. Selden, S. C. and J. E. Sowa. 2004. "Testing a Multi-dimensional Model of Organizational Performance: Prospects and Problems." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(3): 395-416.
85. Senge, P. M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.
86. Shalala, D. E. 1998. "Guest Editorial: Are Large Public Organizations Manageable?" Public Administration Review 58(4): 284-289.
87. Simon, H. A. 1964. "On the Concept of Organizational Goal." Administrative Science Quarterly 9(1): 1-22.
88. Singer, P. 2005. "Bush and the Bureaucracy: A Crusade for Control." National Journal (March). http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0305/032505nj1.htm.
89. Steers, R. M. 1975. "Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness." Administrative Science Quarterly 20(4): 546-568.
90. Steiner, I. D. 1972. Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press
91. Stinchcombe, A. L. 1965. "Social Structure and Organizations." Pp. 153-193 in J. G. March, ed., Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand McNally.
92. U.S. General Accountability Office (GAO). 1997. Managing for Results: Prospects for Effective Implementation of the Government Performance Results Act. http://www.gao.gov.
93. U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO). 2004. United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions, 2004 (Plum Book). Washington, DC: Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
94. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2006. Guidance for Completing 2006 PARTs. www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part/index.html.
95. U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM). 2007. "Federal Human Resources Data." www.fedscope.opm.gov.
96. Van de Ven, A. H. and D. L. Ferry. 1980. Measuring and Assessing Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
97. Verhoest, K. 2005. "Effects of Autonomy, Performance Contracting, and Competition on the Performance of a Public Agency: A Case Study." Policy Studies Journal 33(2): 235-258.
98. Webb, R. J. 1974. "Organizational Effectiveness and the Voluntary Organization." Academy of Management Journal 17(4): 663-677.
99. Whitnah, D. R. 1983. Government Agencies. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
100. Wildavsky, A. 1979. Speaking Truth to Power. Boston: Little, Brown.
101. Wilson, J. Q. 1980. The Politics of Regulation. New York: Basic Books.
102. Wilson, J. Q. 1989. Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.
103. Wolf, P. J. 1993. "A Case Survey of Bureaucratic Effectiveness in U.S. Cabinet Agencies: Preliminary Results." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3(2): 161-181.
104. Yuchtman, E. and S. E. Seashore. 1967. "A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness." American Sociological Review 32(6): 891-903.