Mapping the structure of science through usage

Scientometrics

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 227-258

  Bollen, Johan ^a   Van De Sompel, Herbert ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748675067     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0151-8     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ADAMS, J. (2005), Early citation counts correlate with accumulated impact. Scientometrics, 63 (3): 567-581.
2. AGRAWAL, R., IMIELTNSKI, T., SWAMI, A. (1993), Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In: ACM SICMOD International Conference, on Management of Data, Washington, DC, pp. 207-216.
3. BAEZA-YATES, R. A., IBEIRO-NETO, B. A. (1999), Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press/AddisonWesley.
4. BOLLEN, J., LUCE, R. (2002), Evaluation of digital library impact and user communities by analysis of usage patterns. D-Lib Magazine, 8 (6).
5. BOLLEN, J., VAN DE SOMPEL, H., SMITH, J., LUCE, R. (2005), Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: a comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing and Management, 41 (6): 1419-1440.
6. BOYACK, K. W. (2004), Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101 (Suppl. 1).
7. BOYACK, K. W., KLAVANS, R., BOERNER, K. (2005), Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64 (3): 351-374.
8. BOYACK, K. W., WYLIE, B. N., DAVIDSON, G. S. (2002), Domain visualization using VxInsight(R) for science and technology management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (9): 764-774.
9. BRAAM, R. R., MOED, H. F., RAAN, A. F. J. VAN (1991a), Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. 1: Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (4): 233-251.
10. BRAAM, R. R., MOED, H. F., RAAN, A. F. J. VAN (1991b), Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. 2: Dynamical aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (4): 252-266.
11. BRIN, S., MOTWANI, R., SILVERSTEIN, C. (1997), Beyond market baskets: generalizing association rules to correlations. In: Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, ACM Press, pp. 265-276.
12. BRODY, T., HARNAD, S. (2005), Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation Impact (Eprint No. 10647). ECS, Intelligence, Agents, and Multimedia Group: University of Southampton.
13. CHAN, P. K. (1999), Constructing web user profiles: a non-invasive learning approach. In: B. MASAND, M. SPILIOPOULOU (Eds), Web Usage Analysis and User Profiling LNAI 1836. San Diego, CA: Springer.
14. CHEN, C. M., PAUL, R. J. (2001), Visualizing a knowledge domains intellectual structure. Computer, 34 (3).
15. CRAMER, H. (1946), Mathematical Models of Statistics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. EGGHE, L., ROUSSEAU, R. (2000), The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (2): 158-165.
17. EVERETT, J. E., PECOTICH, A. (1991), A combined loglinear/MDS model for mapping journals by citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (6): 405-413.
18. HE, S., SPINK, A. (2002), A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (11): 953-959.
19. JOLLIFFE, I. T. (2002), Principal Component Analysis. New York: Springer Verlag.
20. KESSLER, M. M. (1963), Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14: 10-25.
21. KIM, D.-H., IM, I., ADAM, N., ATLURI, V., BIEBER, M., YESHA, Y. (2004), A clickstream-based collaborative filtering personalization model: Towards a better performance. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Workshop on Web Information and Data Management (WIDM 2004). Washington, DC.
22. KING, M. F., BRUNER, G. C. (2000), Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology and Marketing, 17 (2): 79-103.
23. KOHONEN, T. (1995), Self-Organizing Maps. Berlin: Springer.
24. KURTZ, M. J., EICHHORN, G., ACCOMAZZI, A., GRANT, C. S., DEMLEITNER, M., MURRAY, S. S. (2004a), The bibliometric properties of article readership information. JASIST, 56 (2): 111-128.
25. KURTZ, M. J., EICHHORN, G., ACCOMAZZI, A., GRANT, C. S., DEMLEITNER, M., MURRAY, S. S. (2004b), Worldwide use and impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System digital library. JASIST, 56 (1): 36-45.
26. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2004a), Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi-connected graphs in journal citation reports. Journal of Documentation, 60 (4): 371-427.
27. LEYDESDORFF, L. (2004b), Top-down decomposition of the journal citation report of the social science citation index: graphand factor-analytical approaches. Scientometrics, 60 (2): 159-180.
28. LIU, X., BOLLEN, J., NELSON, M. L., VAN DE SOMPEL, H. (2005), Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management, 41 (6): 1462-1480.
29. LIU, X., BOLLEN, J., NELSON, M. L., VAN DE SOMPEL, H., HUSSELL, J., LUCE, R., MARKS, L. (2004), Toolkits for visualizing co-authorship graph. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Joint ACM/IEEE Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), Tuscon, AZ, p. 404.
30. LUWEL, M., MOED, H. F. (1998), Publication delays in the science field and their relationship to the ageing of scientific literature. Scientometrics, 41 (1-2): 29-40.
31. MCCAIN, K. (1991), Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42 (4): 290-296.
32. MOBASHER, B., DAI, H., LUO, T., NAKAGAWA, M. (2001), Effective personalization based on association rule discovery from web usage data. In: WIDM01: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Web Information and Data Management, ACM Press, pp. 9-15.
33. NAOPAUL, P. S. (2002), Visualizing cooperation networks of elite institutions in India. Scientometrics, 54 (2): 213-228.
34. NEDERHOF, A. J. (1985), Methods of coping with social desirability bias. A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15 (3): 263-280.
35. NEWMAN, M. E. J. (2001a), Scientific collaboration networks. II. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E, 64 (2): 016132/1-7.
36. NEWMAN, M. E. J. (2001b), Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64 (1), 016131/1-8.
37. RINIA, E. J., LEEUWEN, T. N. VAN, BRUINS, E. E. W., VUREN, H. G. VAN, RAAN, A. F. J. VAN (2001), Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. Scientometrics, 51 (1): 293-309.
38. SALTON, G. (1998), Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 24 (5): 513-523.
39. SARWAR, B., KARYPIS, G., KONSTAN, J., REIDL, J. (2001), Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on World Wide Web, ACM Press, pp. 285-295.
40. SHANNON, C. E. (1948), A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 21: 319-423.
41. SHESKIN, D. J. (2004), Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
42. SMALL, H. (1973), Co-Citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42: 676-684.
43. SPATH, H. (1980), Cluster Analysis Algorithms. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
44. SPILIOPOULOU, M. (1999), The laborious way from data mining to web mining. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, Special Issue on "Semantics of the Web", 14 (2): 113-126.
45. SRIVASTAVA, J., COOLEY, R., DESHPANDE, M., TAN, P.-N. (2000), Web usage mining: discovery and applications of usage patterns from web data. SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 1 (2): 12-23.
46. TUFEKCI, S. (2003), Generalized decision trees: methodology and applications. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 24 (1): 109-124.
47. VAN DE SOMPEL, H., BEIT-ARIE, O. (2001), Open linking in the scholarly information environment using the OpenURL framework. D-Lib Magazine, 7 (3).
48. VAN DE SOMPEL, H., PAYETTE, S., ERICKSON, J., LAGOZE, C., WARNER, S. (2004), Rethinking scholarly communication. Building the system that scholars deserve. D-Lib Magazine, 10 (9).
49. VAN DE SOMPEL, H., YOUNG, J. A., HICKEY, T. B. (2003), Using the OA1-PMH ... differently. D-Lib Magazine, 9 (7-8).
50. WAGNER, C. S., LEYDESDORFF, L. (2003), Mapping global science using international co-authorships: a comparison of 1990 and 2000. In: Ninth International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. Beijing: ISSI.
51. WOUTERS, P. (1997), Citation cycles and peer review cycles. Scientometrics, 38 (1): 39-55.