Evaluation of a novel needle guide for ultrasound-guided phantom vessel cannulation

Anaesthesia

Volumn 66, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 715-720

  Luyet, C ^a   Hartwich, V ^a   Urwyler, N ^a   Schumacher, P M ^a   Eichenberger, U ^a   Vogt, A ^b  

^a Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy ^*  (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANNULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; NEEDLE; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHANTOM VESSEL CANNULATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; TRANSDUCER; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGY; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEEDLES; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960379659     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06781.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dargin JM, Rebholz CM, Lowenstein RA, Mitchell PM, Feldman JA,. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheter survival in ED patients with difficult access. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 2010; 28: 1-7.
2. Keyes LE, Frazee BW, Snoey ER, Simon BC, Christy D,. Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1999; 34: 711-4.
3. Blaivas M, Lyon M,. The effect of ultrasound guidance on the perceived difficulty of emergency nurse-obtained peripheral IV access. Journal of Emergency Medicine 2006; 31: 407-10. (Pubitemid 44528924)
4. Costantino TG, Parikh AK, Satz WA, Fojtik JP,. Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2005; 46: 456-61. (Pubitemid 41552395)
5. Chinnock B, Thornton S, Hendey GW,. Predictors of success in nurse-performed ultrasound-guided cannulation. Journal of Emergency Medicine 2007; 33: 401-5. (Pubitemid 350181256)
6. French JL, Raine-Fenning NJ, Hardman JG, Bedforth NM,. Pitfalls of ultrasound guided vascular access: the use of three/four-dimensional ultrasound. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 806-13. (Pubitemid 351951797)
7. Urbaniak GC, Plous S,. Research Randomizer (Version 3) [Computer software] (accessed 10/01/2009).
8. Blaivas M, Brannam L, Fernandez E,. Short-axis versus long-axis approaches for teaching ultrasound-guided vascular access on a new inanimate model. Academic Emergency Medicine 2003; 10: 1307-11. (Pubitemid 37531850)
9. Cohen J,. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behaviourial Sciences, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1988.
10. Houle TT,. Importance of effect sizes for the accumulation of knowledge. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 415-7. (Pubitemid 46662203)
11. Victor A, Elsasser A, Hommel G, Blettner M,. Judging a plethora of p-values: how to contend with the problem of multiple testing-part 10 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Ãrzteblatt International 2010; 107: 50-6.
12. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P,. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of non-pharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 2008; 148: 295-309. (Pubitemid 351665487)
13. Stein J, George B, River G, Hebig A, McDermott D,. Ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access: a randomized trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2009; 54: 33-40.
14. Chapman GA, Johnson D, Bodenham AR,. Visualisation of needle position using ultrasonography. Anaesthesia 2006; 61: 148-58. (Pubitemid 43337406)
15. Stokowski G, Steele D, Wilson D,. The use of ultrasound to improve practice and reduce complication rates in peripherally inserted central catheter insertions: final report of investigation. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2009; 32: 145-55.
16. McGee DC, Gould MK,. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. New England Journal of Medicine 2003; 348: 1123-33. (Pubitemid 36337324)
17. Panebianco NL, Fredette JM, Szyld D, Sagalyn EB, Pines JM, Dean AJ,. What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access. Academic Emergency Medicine 2009; 16: 1298-303.
18. Karakitsos D, Labropoulos N, De Groot E, et al., Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. Critical Care 2006; 10: R162.
19. Schnadower D, Lin S, Perera P, Smerling A, Dayan P,. A pilot study of ultrasound analysis before pediatric peripheral vein cannulation attempt. Academic Emergency Medicine 2007; 14: 483-5. (Pubitemid 46575298)