Differential Response of Ant Colonies to Intruders: Attack Strategies Correlate With Potential Threat

Ethology

Volumn 117, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 731-739

  Scharf, Inon ^a,b   Pamminger, Tobias ^a,b   Foitzik, Susanne ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGGREGATION BEHAVIOR; ANT; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; COLONIAL ORGANISM; CONSPECIFIC; EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; FITNESS; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NESTMATE RECOGNITION;

ANIMALIA; FORMICIDAE;

EID: 79960371714     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01926.x     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alloway, T. M. 1979: Raiding behaviour of two species of slave-making ants, Harpagoxenus americanus (Emery) and Leptothorax duloticus Wesson (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim. Behav. 27, 202-210.
2. Alloway, T. M. 1990: Slave-species ant colonies recognize slavemakers as enemies. Anim. Behav. 39, 1218-1220.
3. Arnott, G. & Elwood, R. W. 2009: Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Anim. Behav. 77, 991-1004.
4. Brandt, M., Heinze, J., Schmitt, T. & Foitzik, S. 2005: A chemical level in the coevolutionary arms race between an ant social parasite and its hosts. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 576-586.
5. Buschinger, A. 2009: Social parasitism among ants: a review (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 12, 219-235.
6. Carlin, N. F. & Hölldobler, B. 1986: The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.): I. Hierarchical cues in small colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 123-134.
7. Cerda, X. & Retana, J. 1998: Interference interactions and nest usurpation between two subordinate ant species. Oecologia 113, 577-583.
8. Dimarco, R. D., Farji-Brener, A. G. & Premoli, A. C. 2010: Dear enemy phenomenon in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis: behavioral and genetic evidence. Behav. Ecol. 21, 304-310.
9. Dornhaus, A. & Powell, S. 2010: Foraging and defence strategies. In: Ant Ecology (Lach, L., Parr, C. L. & Abbott, K. L., eds). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, pp. 210-230.
10. Foitzik, S. & Herbers, J. M. 2001: Colony structure of a slavemaking ant. II. Frequency of slave raids and impact on the host population. Evolution 55, 316-323.
11. Gotelli, N. J. & Ellison, A. M. 2004: A Primer of Ecological Statistics. Sinauer, Sunderland.
12. Guerrieri, F. J. & D'Ettorre, P. 2008: The mandible opening response: quantifying aggression elicited by chemical cues in ants. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1109-1113.
13. Hefetz, A. 2007: The evolution of hydrocarbon pheromone parsimony in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) - interplay of colony odor uniformity and odor idiosyncrasy. A review. Myrmecol. News 10, 59-68.
14. Heinze, J., Foitzik, S., Hippert, A. & Hölldobler, B. 1996: Apparent dear-enemy phenomenon and environment-based recognition cues in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Ethology 102, 510-522.
15. Hölldobler, B. & Willson, E. O. 1990: The Ants. Springer, Berlin.
16. Holway, D. A. & Case, T. J. 2001: Effects of colony-level variation on competitive ability in the invasive Argentine ant. Anim. Behav. 61, 1181-1192.
17. Hughes, W. O. H. & Goulson, D. 2001: Polyethism and the importance of context in the alarm reaction of the grass-cutting ant, Atta capiguara. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49, 503-508.
18. Jaffe, K. & Sanchez, C. 1984: On the nestmate-recognition system and territorial marking behaviour in the ant Camponotus rufipes. Insect. Soc. 31, 302-315.
19. Katzav-Gozansky, T., Boulay, R., Vander Meer, R. & Hefetz, A. 2004: In-nest environment modulates nestmate recognition in the ant Camponotus fellah. Naturwissenschaften 91, 186-190.
20. Lamon, B. & Topoff, H. 1981: Avoiding predation by army ants: defensive behaviors of three ant species of the genus Camponotus. Anim. Behav. 29, 1070-1081.
21. Mailleux, A.C., Deneubourg, J.L. & Detrain, C. 2000: How do ants assess food volume? Anim. Behav. 59, 1061-1069.
22. Manly, B. F. J. 1997: Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London.
23. Nowbahari, E., Feneron, R. & Malherbe, M. C. 1999: Effect of body size on aggression in the ant, Cataglyphis niger (Hymenoptera; Formicidae). Aggress. Behav. 25, 369-379.
24. Palmer, T. M. 2004: Wars of attrition: colony size determines competitive outcomes in a guild of African acacia ants. Anim. Behav. 68, 993-1004.
25. Pamminger, T., Scharf, I., Pennings, P. S. & Foitzik, S. 2011: Increased host aggression as an induced defense against slavemaking ants. Behav. Ecol. 22, 255-260.
26. Pearce-Duvet, J. M. C. & Feener, D. H. Jr 2010: Resource discovery in ant communities: do food type and quantity matter? Ecol. Entomol. 35, 549-556.
27. Powell, S. & Clark, E. 2004: Combat between large derived societies: a subterranean army ant established as a predator of mature leaf-cutting ant colonies. Insect. Soc. 51, 342-351.
28. Rivera-Marchand, B., Giray, T. & Guzman-Novoa, E. 2008: The cost of defense in social insects: insights from the honey bee. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 129, 1-10.
29. Satoh, T. & Hirota, T. 2005: Factors affecting internest variation in the aggressiveness of a polygynous ant, Camponotus yamaokai. Entomol. Sci. 8, 277-281.
30. Starks, P. T., Watson, R. E., Dipaola, M. J. & Dipaola, C. P. 1998: The effect of queen number on nestmate discrimination in the facultatively polygynous ant Pseudomyrmex pallidus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 104, 573-584.
31. Stuart, R. J. 1991: Nestmate recognition in leptothoracine ants: testing for effects of queen number, colony size and species of intruder. Anim. Behav. 42, 277-284.
32. Stuart, R. J. 1993: Differences in aggression among sympatric, facultatively polygynous Leptothorax ant species. Anim. Behav. 46, 809-812.
33. Stuart, R. J. & Herbers, M. 2000: Nest mate recognition in ants with complex colonies: within- and between-population variation. Behav. Ecol. 11, 676-685.
34. Tanner, C. J. & Adler, F. R. 2009: To fight or not to fight: context-dependent interspecific aggression in competing ants. Anim. Behav. 77, 297-305.
35. Tollrian, R. 1995: Predator-induced morphological defenses: costs, life history shifts, and maternal effects in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 76, 1691-1705.
36. Von Beeren, C., Maruyama, M., Hashim, R. & Witte, V. 2011: Differential host defense against multiple parasites in ants. Evol. Ecol. 25, 259-276.
37. Whitehouse, M. E. A. & Jaffe, K. 1996: Ant wars: combat strategies, territory and nest defence in the leaf-cutting ant Atta laevigata. Anim. Behav. 51, 1207-1217.
38. Zuk, M. & Stoehr, A. M. 2002: Immune defense and host life history. Am. Nat. 160, S9-S22.