Dear enemy phenomenon in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis: Behavioral and genetic evidence

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 304-310

  Dimarco, Romina D ^a,b   Farji Brener, Alejandro G ^a   Premoli, Andrea C ^a  

^a LABORATORIO ECOTONO   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Aggression; Dear enemy phenomenon; Isozymes; Leaf cutter ants

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ANT; GENETIC VARIATION; HABITUATION;

ARGENTINA; PATAGONIA;

ACROMYRMEX LOBICORNIS; ANIMALIA; ATTA; FORMICIDAE;

EID: 76749128861     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp190     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ballari S, Farji-Brener AG, Tadey M. 2007. Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex lobicornis: division of labour, aggressive behaviour, and location of external refuse dumps. J Insect Behav. 1:87-98.
2. Banschbach VS, Herbes JM. 1996. Complex colony structure in social insects: I. Ecological determinants and genetic consequences. Evolution. 50:285-297.
3. Bennett B. 1989. Nestmate recognition systems in a monogynous po-lygynous species pair of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). II. Environmental factors. Sociobiology. 16:141-147.
4. Beye M, Neumann P, Chapuisat M, Pamilo P, Moritz RFA. 1998. Nest-mate recognition and the genetic relatedness of nests in the ant Formica pratensis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 43:67-72.
5. Bonavita-Cougourdan A, Clement JL, Langen C. 1987. Nestmate recognition: the role of cuticular hydrocarbons in the ant Camponatus vagus Scop. J Entomol Sci. 22:1-10.
6. Boulay R, Cerdá X, Simon T, Roldan M, Hefetz A. 2007. Intraspecific competition in the ant Camponotus cruentatus: should we expect the "dear enemy' effect? Anim Behav. 74:985-993.
7. Boulay R, Katzav-Gozansky T, Vander Meer RK, Hefetz A. 2003. Colony insularity through queen control on worker social motivation in ants. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 270:971-977.
8. Breed MD, Snyder LE, Lynn TL, Morhart JA. 1992. Acquired chemical camouflage in a tropical ant. Anim Behav. 44:519-523.
9. Breed MD, Williams KR, Fewell JH. 1988. Comb wax mediates the acquisition of nest-mate recognition in honey bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 85:8766-8769.
10. Buczkowski G, Silverman J. 2006. Geographical variation in Argentine ant aggression behaviour mediated by environmentally derived nestmate recognition cues. Anim Behav. 71:327-335.
11. Chen JSC, Nonacs P. 2000. Nestmate recognition and intraspecific aggression based on environmental cues in Argentine ants (Hyme-noptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 93:1333-1337.
12. Cherrett JM. 1968. A flight record for queens of Atta cephalotes L. (Hym. Formicidae). Entomol Mon Mag. 104:255-256.
13. Crosland MW. 1989. Kin recognition in the Rhytidoponera confusa I. Environmental odour. Anim Behav. 37:912-919.
14. Diehl E, Araújo AM, Cavalli-Molina S. 2001. Genetic variability and social colonies in Acromyrmex heyeri and Acromyrmes striatus (Hyme-noptera: Formicidae). Braz J Biol. 61:667-678.
15. Eaton L, Medel R. 1994. Allozyme variation and genetic relatedness in a population of Camponatus chilensis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Chile. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 67:157-161.
16. st in island and one-dimensional stepping-stone models of migration. Russ J Genet. 40:1041-1045.
17. Farji-Brener AG. 1996. Posibles v́ias de expansión de la hormiga cor-tadora de hojas Acromyrmex lobicornis hacia la Patagonia. Ecol Austral. 6:144-150.
18. Farji-Brener AG. 2000. Leaf-cutting ant nests in temperate environments: mounds, mound damages and nest mortality rate in Acromyr-mex lobicornis. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. 35:131-138.
19. Farji-Brener AG, Ruggiero A. 1994. Leaf-cutting ants (Atta and Acro-myrmex) inhabiting Argentina: patterns in species richness and geographical range sizes. J Biogeogr. 21:391-399.
20. Fisher JB. 1954. Evolution and bird sociality. In: Huxley J, Hardy AC, Ford EB, editors. Evolution as a process. London: Allen & Unwin. p. 71-83.
21. Gordon DM. 1989. Ants distinguish neighbors from strangers. Oeco-logia. 81:198-200.
22. Greene MJ, Gordon DM. 2007. Structural complexity of chemical recognition cues affects the perception of group membership in the ants Linephithema humile and Aphaenogaster cockerelli. J Exp Biol. 210:897-905.
23. Hartl DL, Clark AG. 1997. Principles of population genetics. Sunder-land (MA): Sinauer Associates, Inc Publishers.
24. Heinze J, Foitzik S, Hippert A, Holldobler B. 1996. Apparent dear-enemy phenomenon and environment-based recognition cues in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Ethology. 102:510-522.
25. Hernandez JV, Lopez H, Jaffe K. 2002. Nestmate recognition signals of the leaf-cutting ant Atta laevigata. J Insect Physiol. 48:287-295.
26. Hölldobler B, Lumsden CJ. 1980. Territorial strategies in ants. Science. 210:732-739.
27. Jaeger RG. 1981. Dear enemy recognition and the costs of aggression between salamanders. Am Nat. 117:962-979.
28. Jutsum AR, Saunders TS, Cherrett JM. 1979. Intra-specific aggression in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosus. Anim Behav. 27:839-844.
29. Kaib M, Franke S, Francke W, Brandl R. 2002. Cuticular hydrocarbons in a termite: phenotypes and a neighbour-stranger effect. Physiol Entomol. 27:189-198.
30. Knaden M, Wehner R. 2003. Nest defense and conspecific enemy recognition in the desert ant Cataglyphis fortis. J Insect Behav. 16: 717-730.
31. Lahav S, Soroker V, Hefetz A, Vander Meer RK. 1999. Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as ant recognition discriminators. Naturwissenschaften. 86:246-249.
32. Langen TA, Tripet F, Nonacs P. 2000. The red and the black: habitu-ation and the dear-enemy phenomenon in two desert Pheidole ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 48:285-292.
33. Mäki-Petäys H, Zakharov A, Viljakainen L, Corander J, Pamilo P. 2005. Genetic changes associated to declining populations of Formica ants in fragmented forest landscape. Mol Ecol. 14:733-742.
34. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:209-220.
35. Martin SJ, Helantera H, Drijfhout FP. 2008. Colony-specific hydrocarbons identify nest mates in two species of Formica ant. J Chem Ecol. 34:1072-1080.
36. Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat. 106: 283-292.
37. Orivel J, Errard C, Dejean A. 1997. Ant gardens: interspecific recognition in parabiotic ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 40:87-93.
38. Ortius-Lechner D, Gertsch PJ, Boomsma JJ. 2000. Variable microsatel-lite loci for the leaf cutter ant Acromyrmex echinatior and their applicability to related species. Mol Ecol. 9:114-116.
39. Owen PC, Perrill SA. 1998. Habituation in the green frog, Rana cla-mitans. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 44:209-213.
40. Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 6:288-295.
41. Pirk CWW, Neumann P, Moritz RFA, Pamilo P. 2001. Intranest relat-edness and nestmate recognition in the meadow ant Formica praten-sis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 49:366-374.
42. Roulston TH, Buczkowski G, Silverman J. 2003. Nestmate discrimination in ants: effect of bioassay on aggressive behavior. Insectes Sociaux. 50:151-159.
43. Sanada-Morimura S, Minai M, Yokohama M, Hirota T, Satoh T, Obara Y. 2003. Encounter-induced hostility to neighbors in the ant Pristo-myrmex pungens. Behav Ecol. 14:713-718.
44. Seppä P. 1992. Genetic relatedness of worker nestmates in Myrmica ruginodis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) populations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 30:253-260.
45. Shaw CR, Prasad R. 1970. Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes-a compilation of recipes. Biochem Genet. 4:297-320.
46. StatSoft Inc. 2004. Statistica for windows. Tulsa (OK): USA.
47. Stuart RJ. 1987. Transient nestmate recognition cues contribute to a multicolonial population structure in the ant Leptothorax curvispi-nosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 21:229-235.
48. Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Holway DA, Case TJ. 1999. Behavioral and genetic differentiation between native and introduced populations of the Argentine ant. Biol Invasions. 1:1-11.
49. Swofford DL, Selander RB. 1989. Biosys 1.7: a computer program for the analysis of allelic variation in population genetics and biochemical systematics. Urbana (IL): Illinois National History Survey, University of Illinois.
50. Temeles EJ. 1994. The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they "dear enemies"? Anim Behav. 47:339-350.
51. Thomas ML, Payne-Makrisa CM, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Holway DA. 2006. When supercolonies collide: territorial aggression in an invasive and unicolonial social insect. Mol Ecol. 15: 4303-4315.
52. Thomas ML, Payne-Makrisâ CM, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Holway DA. 2007. Contact between supercolonies elevates aggression in Argentine ants. Insectes Sociaux. 54:225-233.
53. Thurin N, Aron S. 2008. Seasonal nestmate recognition in the polyd-omous ant Plagiolepis pygmaea. Anim Behav. 75:1023-1030.
54. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Grosberg RK. 2003. Genetic diversity, asymmetrical aggression, and recognition in a widespread invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100:1078-1083.
55. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ. 2000. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97:5948-5953.
56. van Wilgenburg E. 2007. The influence of relatedness, neighbourhood and overall distance on colony mate recognition in a polydo-mous ant. Ethology. 113:1185-1191.
57. Wagner D, Tissot M, Cuevas W, Gordon DM. 2000. Harvester ants utilize cuticular hydrocarbons in nestmate recognition. J Chem Ecol. 26:2245-2257.
58. Wilson EO. 1975. Sociobiology. Cambridge (UK): Belknap Press.
59. Wright S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution. 19: 395-420.
60. Wright S. 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61. Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TJB. 1999. POPGENE, Microsoft Windows-based freeware for population genetic analyses. Edmonton (Canada): University of Alberta.
62. Ydenberg RC, Giraldeu LA, Falls JB. 1988. Neighbours, strangers, and the asymmetric war of attrition. Anim Behav. 36:343-347.