Loop domain organization of the p53 locus in normal and breast cancer cells correlates with the transcriptional status of the TP53 and the neighboring genes

Journal of Cellular Biochemistry

Volumn 112, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2072-2081

  Goes, Andrea C S ^a,b   Cappellen, David ^a   Santos Jr , Gilson C ^b   Pirozhkova, Iryna ^a   Lipinski, Marc ^a   Vassetzky, Yegor ^a   De Moura Gallo, Claudia V ^a,b  

^a INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Chromatin loop domain; MAR; p53; Transcription

Indexed keywords

DNA; PROTEIN P53;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CELL; BREAST EPITHELIUM; CANCER CELL; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CELL LINE; CELL NUCLEUS MATRIX; CELL STRAIN MCF 7; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA MICROARRAY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENETIC LOCI; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; LIPOPROTEINS, HDL; MODELS, GENETIC; NUCLEAR MATRIX; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; RECEPTORS, LIPOPROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN P53;

EID: 79960367030     PISSN: 07302312     EISSN: 10974644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.23129     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bourdon JC,. 2007. p53 and its isoforms in cancer. Br J Cancer 97: 277-282.
2. Buongiorno-Nardelli M, Micheli G, Carri MT, Marilley M,. 1982. A relationship beween repliconsize and supercoiled loop domains in the eukaryotic genome. Nature 298: 100-102. (Pubitemid 12087493)
3. Eivazova ER, Gavrilov A, Pirozhkova I, Petrov A, Iarovaia OV, Razin SV, Lipinski M, Vassetzky YS,. 2009. Interaction in vivo between the two matrix attachment regions flanking a single chromatin loop. J Mol Biol 386 (4): 929-937.
4. Frisch M, Frech K, Klingenhoff A, Cartharius K, Liebich I, Werner T,. 2002. In silico prediction of scaffold/matrix attachment regions in large genomic sequences. Genome Res 12: 349-354. (Pubitemid 34163002)
5. Gasser SM, Vassetzky YS,. 1998. In:, Gould H, editors. Chromatin. A practical approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp 111-124.
6. Gasser SM, Laemmli UK,. 1986. Cohabitation of scaffold binding regions with upstream/enhancer elements of three developmentally regulated genes of D. melanogaster. Cell 46 (4): 521-530.
7. Hancock R, Boulikas T,. 1982. Functional organization in the nucleus. Int Rev Cytol 79: 165-214. Review. (Pubitemid 13178586)
8. Hollstein M, Hainaut P,. 2010. Massively regulated genes: the example of TP53. J Pathol 220 (2): 164-173.
9. Ioudinkova E, Petrov A, Razin SV, Vassetzky YS,. 2005. Mapping long-range chromatin organization within the chicken alpha-globin gene domain using oligonucleotide DNA arrays. Genomics 85 (1): 143-151. (Pubitemid 39655699)
10. Lainé JP, Singh BN, Krishnamurthy S, Hampsey M,. 2009. A physiological role for gene loops in yeast. Genes Dev 23: 2604-2609.
11. Levine AJ, Oren M,. 2009. The first 30 years of p53: growing ever more complex. Nat Rev Cancer 9 (10): 749-758.
12. Linnemann A, Krawetz S,. 2009a. Maintenance of a functional higher order chromatin structure: the role of the nuclear matrix in normal and disease states. Gene Ther Mol Biol 13: 231-243.
13. Linnemann A, Krawetz S,. 2009b. Silencing by nuclear matrix attachment distinguishes cell-type specificity: association with increased proliferation capacity. Nucleic Acids Res 37 (9): 2779-2788.
14. Linskens MH, Eijsermans A, Dijkwel PA,. 1987. Comparative analysis of DNA loop length in nontransformed and transformed hamster cells. Mutat Res 178 (2): 245-256.
15. Mirkovitch J, Mirault ME, Laemmli UK,. 1984. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell 39 (1): 223-232. (Pubitemid 15218240)
16. Neve RM, Chin K, Fridlyand J, Yeh J, Baehner FL, Fevr T, Clark L, Bayani N, Coppe J-P, Tong F, Speed T, Spellman PT, DeVries S, Lapuk A, Wang NJ, Kuo W-L, Stilwell JL, Pinkel D, Albertson DG, Waldman FM, McCormick F, Dickson RB, Johnson MD, Lippman M, Ethier S, Gazdar A, Gray JW,. 2006. A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell 10: 515-527. (Pubitemid 44854747)
17. Oberhammer F, Wilson JW, Dive C, Morris ID, Hickman JA, Wakeling AE, Walker PR, Sikorska M,. 1993. Apoptotic death in epithelial cells: cleavage of DNA to 300 and/or 50kb fragments prior to or in the absence of internucleosomal fragmentation. EMBO J 12 (9): 3679-3684. (Pubitemid 23256455)
18. Olivier M, Petitjean A, Marcel V, Pétré A, Mounawar M, Plymoth A, de Fromentel CC, Hainaut P,. 2009. Recent advances in p53 research: an interdisciplinary perspective. Cancer Gene Ther 16: 1-12.
19. Olivier M, Langerod A, Carrieri P, Bergh J, Klaar S, Eyfjord J, Theillet C, Rodriguez C, Lidereau R, Bieche I, Varley J, Bignon Y, Uhrhammer N, Winqvist R, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Niederacher D, Kato S, Ishioka C, Hainaut P, Borresen-Dale AL,. 2006. The clinical value of somatic TP53 gene mutations in 1,794 patients with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12: 1157-1167. (Pubitemid 43342504)
20. Paulson JR, Laemmli UK,. 1977. The structure of histone-depleted metaphase chromosomes. Cell 12 (3): 817-828.
21. Petrov A, Pirozhkova I, Carnac G, Laoudj D, Lipinski M, Vassetzky YS,. 2006. Chromatin loop domain organization within the 4q35 locus in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy patients versus normal human myoblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 6982-6987.
22. Petrov A, Allinne J, Pirozhkova I, Laoudj D, Lipinski M, Vassetzky YS,. 2008. A nuclear matrix attachment site in the 4q35 locus has an enhancer-blocking activity in vivo: implications for the facio-scapulo-humeral dystrophy. Genome Res 18: 39-45.
23. Razin SV, Vassetzky YS, Hancock R,. 1991. Nuclear matrix attachment regions and topoisomerase II binding and reaction sites in the vicinity of a chicken DNA replication origin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 177 (1): 265-270.
24. Razin SV, Iarovaia OV, Sjakste N, Sjakste T, Bagdoniene L, Rynditch AV, Eivazova ER, Lipinski M, Vassetzky YS,. 2007. Chromatin domains and regulation of transcription. J Mol Biol 369: 597-607. (Pubitemid 46722607)
25. Schoenlein PV, Barrett JT, Welter D,. 1999. The degradation profile of extrachromosomal circular DNA during cisplatin-induced apoptosis is consistent with preferential cleavage at matrix attachment regions. Chromosoma 108 (2): 121-131. (Pubitemid 29221658)
26. Simão TA, Ribeiro FS, Amorim LM, Albano RM, Andrada-Serpa MJ, Cardoso LE, Mendonça GAS, De Moura Gallo CV,. 2002. TP53 mutations in breast cancer tumors of patients from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: association with risk factors and tumor characteristics. Int J Cancer 101: 69-73.
27. Simon P,. 2003. Q-Gene: processing quantitative real-time RT-PCR data. Bioinformatics 19: 1439-1440. (Pubitemid 36939825)
28. Tan-Wong SM, Wijayatilake HD, Proudfoot NJ,. 2009. Gene loops function to maintain transcriptional memory through interaction with the nuclear pore complex. Genes Dev 23: 2610-2624.
29. Singh GB, Kramer JA, Krawetz SA,. 1997. Mathematical model to predict regions of chromatin attachment to the nuclear matrix. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 1419-1425. (Pubitemid 27303671)
30. Vassetzky YS, Hair A, Razin SV,. 2000a. Rearrangement of chromatin domains in cancer and development. J Cell Biochem Suppl 35: 54-60. Review.
31. Vassetzky YS, Hair A, Méchali M,. 2000b. Rearrangement of chromatin domains during development in Xenopus. Genes Dev 14 (12): 1541-1552. (Pubitemid 30421845)
32. Vogelstein B, Lane D, Levine AJ,. 2000. Surfing the p53 network. Nature 408: 307-310.
33. Yochum GS, Sherrick CM, Macpartlin M, Goodman RH,. 2010. A β-catenin/TCF-coordinated chromatin loop at MYC integrates 5′and 3′ Wnt responsive enhancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 145-150.